How to tie dangerous surgical knots: easily. Can we avoid this?

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2021-07-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091
Eric Drabble, Sofia Spanopoulou, Eleni Sioka, Ellie Politaki, Ismini Paraskeva, Effrosyni Palla, Lauren Stockley, Dimitris Zacharoulis
{"title":"How to tie dangerous surgical knots: easily. Can we avoid this?","authors":"Eric Drabble,&nbsp;Sofia Spanopoulou,&nbsp;Eleni Sioka,&nbsp;Ellie Politaki,&nbsp;Ismini Paraskeva,&nbsp;Effrosyni Palla,&nbsp;Lauren Stockley,&nbsp;Dimitris Zacharoulis","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Secure knots are essential in all areas of surgical, medical and veterinary practice. Our hypothesis was that technique of formation of each layer of a surgical knot was important to its security.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Equal numbers of knots were tied, by each of three groups, using three techniques, for each of four suture materials; a standard flat reef knot (FRK), knots tied under tension (TK) and knots laid without appropriate hand crossing (NHCK). Each knot technique was performed reproducibly, and tested by distraction with increasing force, till each material broke or the knot separated completely.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Temporary knot tying laboratory.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>The suture materials were, 2/0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), 3/0 polydioxanone, 4/0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) and 1 nylon (Ethilon).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three groups comprised, a senior surgeon, a resident surgeon and three medical students.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Proportion of each knot type that slipped, degree of slippage and length of suture held in loop secured by each knot type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20% of FRK tied with all suture materials slipped; all knots tied with the other two techniques, with all materials, slipped, TK (100%) and NHCK (100%). The quantitative degree of slip was significantly less for FRK (mean 6.3%-, 95% CI 2.2% to 10.4%) than for TK (mean 312%, 95% CI 280.0% to 344.0%) and NHCK (mean 113.0%, -95% CI 94.3% to 131.0%).The mean length of suture in loops held within (FRK mean 25.1 mm 95% CI 24.2 to 26.0 mm) was significantly greater than mean lengths held by the other techniques (TK mean 17.0 mm, 95% CI 16.3 to 17.7 mm), (NHCK mean 16.3 mm, 95% CI 15.9 to 16.7 mm). The latter two types of knot may have tightened more than anticipated, in comparison to FRK, with potential undue tissue tension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Meticulous technique of knot tying is essential for secure knots, appropriate tissue tension and the security of anastomoses and haemostasis effected.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Secure knots are essential in all areas of surgical, medical and veterinary practice. Our hypothesis was that technique of formation of each layer of a surgical knot was important to its security.

Design: Equal numbers of knots were tied, by each of three groups, using three techniques, for each of four suture materials; a standard flat reef knot (FRK), knots tied under tension (TK) and knots laid without appropriate hand crossing (NHCK). Each knot technique was performed reproducibly, and tested by distraction with increasing force, till each material broke or the knot separated completely.

Setting: Temporary knot tying laboratory.

Materials: The suture materials were, 2/0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), 3/0 polydioxanone, 4/0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) and 1 nylon (Ethilon).

Participants: Three groups comprised, a senior surgeon, a resident surgeon and three medical students.

Outcome measures: Proportion of each knot type that slipped, degree of slippage and length of suture held in loop secured by each knot type.

Results: 20% of FRK tied with all suture materials slipped; all knots tied with the other two techniques, with all materials, slipped, TK (100%) and NHCK (100%). The quantitative degree of slip was significantly less for FRK (mean 6.3%-, 95% CI 2.2% to 10.4%) than for TK (mean 312%, 95% CI 280.0% to 344.0%) and NHCK (mean 113.0%, -95% CI 94.3% to 131.0%).The mean length of suture in loops held within (FRK mean 25.1 mm 95% CI 24.2 to 26.0 mm) was significantly greater than mean lengths held by the other techniques (TK mean 17.0 mm, 95% CI 16.3 to 17.7 mm), (NHCK mean 16.3 mm, 95% CI 15.9 to 16.7 mm). The latter two types of knot may have tightened more than anticipated, in comparison to FRK, with potential undue tissue tension.

Conclusion: Meticulous technique of knot tying is essential for secure knots, appropriate tissue tension and the security of anastomoses and haemostasis effected.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

如何打危险的手术结:很容易。我们能避免这种情况吗?
目的:安全结是必不可少的所有领域的外科,医学和兽医实践。我们的假设是,每层手术结的形成技术对其安全性很重要。设计:四种缝合材料,三组各使用三种技术,打结数量相等;一个标准的平礁结(FRK),在张力下打结(TK)和打结没有适当的手交叉(NHCK)。每一种打结技术都是可重复的,并通过增加力的分散来测试,直到每一种材料断裂或打结完全分离。设置:临时打结实验室。材料:缝合材料为:2/0聚乳酸蛋白910 (Vicryl), 3/0聚二氧环酮,4/0聚戊二酮25 (Monocryl), 1尼龙(Ethilon)。参与者:由一名资深外科医生、一名住院外科医生和三名医科学生组成。结果测量:每个结类型滑动的比例,滑动的程度和缝线的长度,固定在每个结类型的环。结果:20%的FRK系紧,所有缝合材料滑落;所有结用其他两种技术打结,所有材料,滑,TK(100%)和NHCK(100%)。FRK的定量滑移程度(平均6.3%-,95% CI 2.2%至10.4%)明显小于TK(平均312%,95% CI 280.0%至344.0%)和NHCK(平均113.0%,-95% CI 94.3%至131.0%)。环内缝合的平均长度(FRK平均值为25.1 mm, 95% CI为24.2至26.0 mm)显著大于其他技术(TK平均值为17.0 mm, 95% CI为16.3至17.7 mm), (NHCK平均值为16.3 mm, 95% CI为15.9至16.7 mm)。后两种类型的结可能比预期的更紧,与FRK相比,潜在的不适当的组织张力。结论:严密的打结技术是保证结结牢固、组织张力适当、吻合口安全和止血效果的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信