Fertility Benefits at Top U.S. Medical Schools.

Journal of women's health (2002) Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2021.0486
Kim Hoang, Neal Evans, Lusine Aghajanova, Hina Talib, Eleni Linos, Jessica M Gold
{"title":"Fertility Benefits at Top U.S. Medical Schools.","authors":"Kim Hoang,&nbsp;Neal Evans,&nbsp;Lusine Aghajanova,&nbsp;Hina Talib,&nbsp;Eleni Linos,&nbsp;Jessica M Gold","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2021.0486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Female physicians have a higher prevalence of infertility compared with the general population. Physician well-being can be significantly impacted by the physical and emotional challenges associated with this, including the high cost of fertility treatments, which are often not covered by health insurance. There are limited data on the current state of fertility coverage available for physicians. This study examines fertility insurance benefits offered for faculty at top U.S. medical schools. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between March and April 2021, we reviewed fertility benefits at medical schools ranked in the top 14 for research as identified by the <i>US News & World Report 2021</i>. The summary plan descriptions of benefits were collected from each institution's human resources (HR) website and direct phone call to HR representatives. We examined descriptions of coverage for fertility services including evaluation, treatments, medications, maximum lifetime coverage, and whether a formal diagnosis of infertility was required for benefit eligibility. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Fourteen institutions offer benefits for fertility evaluation and 13 offer benefits for treatment. Of the 13 institutions that offer treatment coverage, 11 cover <i>in vitro</i> fertilization, with 6 having limits on the number of cycles. Twelve offer medication coverage. Ten institutions specified maximum lifetime coverage for treatments and medications, ranging from $10,000 to $100,000. Only 1 school provided coverage for elective fertility preservation, and none covered surrogacy expenses. Half of the schools are in states where fertility benefits are mandated. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There is wide variation in fertility benefits offered at top medical schools across the country. Many schools offered coverage for fertility evaluation and treatments; however, majority had restrictions and limitations to the benefits, suggesting that there is still inadequate coverage provided. This study's selected sample also does not reflect other medical schools across the country, which may not be as well-resourced in their provision of fertility benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":"1369-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Female physicians have a higher prevalence of infertility compared with the general population. Physician well-being can be significantly impacted by the physical and emotional challenges associated with this, including the high cost of fertility treatments, which are often not covered by health insurance. There are limited data on the current state of fertility coverage available for physicians. This study examines fertility insurance benefits offered for faculty at top U.S. medical schools. Methods: Between March and April 2021, we reviewed fertility benefits at medical schools ranked in the top 14 for research as identified by the US News & World Report 2021. The summary plan descriptions of benefits were collected from each institution's human resources (HR) website and direct phone call to HR representatives. We examined descriptions of coverage for fertility services including evaluation, treatments, medications, maximum lifetime coverage, and whether a formal diagnosis of infertility was required for benefit eligibility. Results: Fourteen institutions offer benefits for fertility evaluation and 13 offer benefits for treatment. Of the 13 institutions that offer treatment coverage, 11 cover in vitro fertilization, with 6 having limits on the number of cycles. Twelve offer medication coverage. Ten institutions specified maximum lifetime coverage for treatments and medications, ranging from $10,000 to $100,000. Only 1 school provided coverage for elective fertility preservation, and none covered surrogacy expenses. Half of the schools are in states where fertility benefits are mandated. Conclusion: There is wide variation in fertility benefits offered at top medical schools across the country. Many schools offered coverage for fertility evaluation and treatments; however, majority had restrictions and limitations to the benefits, suggesting that there is still inadequate coverage provided. This study's selected sample also does not reflect other medical schools across the country, which may not be as well-resourced in their provision of fertility benefits.

美国顶尖医学院的生育福利
背景:与一般人群相比,女医生的不孕症患病率较高。与此相关的身体和情感挑战,包括生育治疗的高昂费用,往往不在医疗保险范围内,可能严重影响医生的福祉。目前可供医生使用的生育覆盖率数据有限。这项研究调查了美国顶尖医学院为教师提供的生育保险福利。方法:在2021年3月至4月期间,我们回顾了《2021年美国新闻与世界报道》确定的研究排名前14位的医学院的生育效益。福利总结计划描述是从每个机构的人力资源(HR)网站上收集的,并直接打电话给HR代表。我们检查了生育服务覆盖范围的描述,包括评估、治疗、药物、最大寿命覆盖范围,以及是否需要正式诊断不孕症才能获得福利资格。结果:14家机构提供生育评估福利,13家机构提供治疗福利。在提供治疗服务的13个机构中,11个机构提供体外受精服务,6个机构对周期数量有限制。其中12个提供药品保险。10家机构规定了治疗和药物的最高终身保险金额,从1万美元到10万美元不等。只有1所学校提供选择性生育保护,没有一所学校提供代孕费用。一半的学校位于强制实行生育福利的州。结论:全国顶尖医学院提供的生育福利差异很大。许多学校提供生育评估和治疗费用;然而,大多数人对福利有限制和限制,这表明所提供的覆盖范围仍然不足。这项研究选择的样本也没有反映全国其他医学院的情况,这些医学院在提供生育福利方面可能没有那么充足的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信