Comparative Assessment of Functional Outcomes of Surgical Treatment in Patients with Distal Radial Fractures.

Q3 Medicine
Jakub Florek, Filip Georgiew, Ireneusz Kotela
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Functional Outcomes of Surgical Treatment in Patients with Distal Radial Fractures.","authors":"Jakub Florek,&nbsp;Filip Georgiew,&nbsp;Ireneusz Kotela","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unstable and comminuted distal radial fractures require surgical treatment by percutaneous insertion of Kir-schner wires, open reduction and fixation with a non-locking or locking plate or with an external device. The aim of this paper was to try to answer the following question: are there differences in functional treatment outcomes in patients after surgery with the use of Kirschner wires vs LCP plate fixation?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study group included 100 patients after surgical treatment by closed reduction and simple fixation with Kirschner wires (50 patients) and by open reduction and LCP locking plate fixation (50 patients). The study assessed the following parameters: global grip strength, pain severity in a VAS scale, range of motion, functional status of the wrist based on the Fernandez classification, quality of life according to the QuickDASH score, and the frequency of complications. These parameters were assessed at 6 and 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An assessment of the treatment outcomes at 6 and 12 months after surgery showed statistically significant differences between the treatment methods in the following parameters: pain severity, global grip strength and range of motion in the sagittal plane. A comparison of the functional status of the wrist at 6 and 12 months between the groups showed considerably worse results in the Kirschner wire fixation group. The frequency of postoperative complications at 12 months was 6% in the Kirschner wire fixation group and 2% in the LCP plate fixation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>1. Treatment outcomes were better in patients with distal radial fractures managed with LCP plate fixation. 2. The use of LCP plate fixation predisposes pa-tients to better ranges of mobility in the sagittal plane in the radiocarpal joint. 3.The values of global grip strength were higher in the group treated with LCP plate fixation. 4. Patients treated with LCP plates have better limb function and quality of life and lower pain intensity after treatment completion. 5. The number of complications was higher in pa-tients treated with Kirschner wire fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19622,"journal":{"name":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","volume":"23 6","pages":"401-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unstable and comminuted distal radial fractures require surgical treatment by percutaneous insertion of Kir-schner wires, open reduction and fixation with a non-locking or locking plate or with an external device. The aim of this paper was to try to answer the following question: are there differences in functional treatment outcomes in patients after surgery with the use of Kirschner wires vs LCP plate fixation?

Material and methods: The study group included 100 patients after surgical treatment by closed reduction and simple fixation with Kirschner wires (50 patients) and by open reduction and LCP locking plate fixation (50 patients). The study assessed the following parameters: global grip strength, pain severity in a VAS scale, range of motion, functional status of the wrist based on the Fernandez classification, quality of life according to the QuickDASH score, and the frequency of complications. These parameters were assessed at 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Results: An assessment of the treatment outcomes at 6 and 12 months after surgery showed statistically significant differences between the treatment methods in the following parameters: pain severity, global grip strength and range of motion in the sagittal plane. A comparison of the functional status of the wrist at 6 and 12 months between the groups showed considerably worse results in the Kirschner wire fixation group. The frequency of postoperative complications at 12 months was 6% in the Kirschner wire fixation group and 2% in the LCP plate fixation group.

Conclusions: 1. Treatment outcomes were better in patients with distal radial fractures managed with LCP plate fixation. 2. The use of LCP plate fixation predisposes pa-tients to better ranges of mobility in the sagittal plane in the radiocarpal joint. 3.The values of global grip strength were higher in the group treated with LCP plate fixation. 4. Patients treated with LCP plates have better limb function and quality of life and lower pain intensity after treatment completion. 5. The number of complications was higher in pa-tients treated with Kirschner wire fixation.

桡骨远端骨折手术治疗功能预后的比较评价。
背景:不稳定和粉碎性桡骨远端骨折需要经皮克氏针置入、切开复位和非锁定或锁定钢板或外部装置固定的手术治疗。本文的目的是试图回答以下问题:手术后使用克氏针与LCP钢板固定的患者在功能治疗结果上是否存在差异?材料与方法:研究组采用克氏针闭合复位简单固定(50例)和切开复位LCP锁定钢板固定(50例)手术治疗的患者100例。研究评估了以下参数:总体握力、VAS评分中的疼痛严重程度、活动范围、基于Fernandez分类的手腕功能状态、根据QuickDASH评分的生活质量以及并发症的发生频率。这些参数在术后6个月和12个月进行评估。结果:术后6个月和12个月的治疗结果评估显示,两种治疗方法在以下参数方面存在统计学差异:疼痛严重程度、整体握力和矢状面活动范围。6个月和12个月时两组腕部功能状态的比较显示,克氏针固定组的结果明显较差。术后12个月并发症发生率克氏针固定组为6%,LCP钢板固定组为2%。结论:1。采用LCP钢板固定桡骨远端骨折患者的治疗效果较好。2. 使用LCP钢板固定可使患者在桡腕关节矢状面有更好的活动范围。3.LCP钢板固定组整体握力值较高。4. 接受LCP钢板治疗的患者在完成治疗后具有较好的肢体功能和生活质量以及较低的疼痛强度。5. 克氏针内固定组并发症发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信