A Comparative Study Of Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Simrandeep Singh, Ratika Gupta, Tejinder Paul Singh, S L Jakhar, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar
{"title":"A Comparative Study Of Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Simrandeep Singh, Ratika Gupta, Tejinder Paul Singh, S L Jakhar, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy would result in better tumor control, improved symptom control and any variation in toxicity as compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between February 2015 to September 2016, 25 patients each were randomized to control group, in which they received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 intravenous, during chest radiotherapy of 66Gy in 33 fractions for 6.5 weeks, and study group, in which patients received three cycles of induction chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m2and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2administered every 21 days followed by identical chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups of patients (with induction vs. without induction chemotherapy) were similar in age, performance status, histology, grade, and stage. At 6thmonth follow-up, complete response was seen in 6 patients in control arm and 7 patients in study arm (?2 = 1.603, p = 0.205) and partial response was seen in 13 and 12 patients in control and study arms respectively (?2 = 1.932, p = 0.165). Symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea were also similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In our study, no difference in treatment outcome with respect to the two groups was observed, which was similar to studies which have been conducted previously. Radiation is a good modality for symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea. In toxicities, pneumonitis and hematological toxicity was slightly higher in study group even at 6th month follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slight increase in toxicity with no added benefit in locoregional tumor control and symptom regression, was seen in patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone can thus be used as only modality of treatment in unresectable stage III NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":"1 37","pages":"62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy would result in better tumor control, improved symptom control and any variation in toxicity as compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone.
Patients and methods: Between February 2015 to September 2016, 25 patients each were randomized to control group, in which they received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 intravenous, during chest radiotherapy of 66Gy in 33 fractions for 6.5 weeks, and study group, in which patients received three cycles of induction chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m2and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2administered every 21 days followed by identical chemoradiotherapy.
Results: The two groups of patients (with induction vs. without induction chemotherapy) were similar in age, performance status, histology, grade, and stage. At 6thmonth follow-up, complete response was seen in 6 patients in control arm and 7 patients in study arm (?2 = 1.603, p = 0.205) and partial response was seen in 13 and 12 patients in control and study arms respectively (?2 = 1.932, p = 0.165). Symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea were also similar in both groups.
Discussion: In our study, no difference in treatment outcome with respect to the two groups was observed, which was similar to studies which have been conducted previously. Radiation is a good modality for symptom control of cough, hemoptysis, chest pain and dyspnoea. In toxicities, pneumonitis and hematological toxicity was slightly higher in study group even at 6th month follow up.
Conclusion: Slight increase in toxicity with no added benefit in locoregional tumor control and symptom regression, was seen in patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone can thus be used as only modality of treatment in unresectable stage III NSCLC.