Klara Borgardts, Johannes Menzel-Severing, Gerd Geerling, Theo G Seiler
{"title":"[Treatment indications for corneal crosslinking and clinical results of new corneal crosslinking techniques].","authors":"Klara Borgardts, Johannes Menzel-Severing, Gerd Geerling, Theo G Seiler","doi":"10.1007/s00347-022-01579-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is used in keratoconus to strengthen and stabilize the cornea and to prevent further progression with subsequent visual loss and the possible need for keratoplasty. Correct treatment indications is crucial in this context. Since the introduction of the initial Dresden protocol, other modified CXL protocols have been proposed to optimize treatment success.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relevant parameters for treatment indications are explained and the clinical results of new CXL protocols are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The currently valid criteria with respect to the indications for CXL in keratoconus, PubMed search for relevant publications and own experiences with different CXL protocols are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reproducibility of topographic parameters depends on the stage of the keratoconus. Accelerated CXL as well as transepithelial CXL with a hyperoxic environment show comparable efficiency with shorter surgery time and possibly lower complication rates. Customized CXL with an individualized UV irradiation profile provides improved results with faster epithelial healing. Lower UV energy doses enable CXL to be conducted in eyes with minimal stromal pachymetry of less than 400 µm before irradiation. The combination of CXL with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) provides visual acuity improvements but also increases the risk of visual loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current indication rules for CXL neglect the reduced reproducability of topographic and tomographic measurements in keratoconus. The latest CXL protocols presented here provide a safe alternative with similar and/or better efficacy compared to standard CXL. The combination of CXL with PRK offers an option for visual rehabilitation in patients with contact lens intolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":"119 4","pages":"350-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-022-01579-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is used in keratoconus to strengthen and stabilize the cornea and to prevent further progression with subsequent visual loss and the possible need for keratoplasty. Correct treatment indications is crucial in this context. Since the introduction of the initial Dresden protocol, other modified CXL protocols have been proposed to optimize treatment success.
Objective: The relevant parameters for treatment indications are explained and the clinical results of new CXL protocols are presented.
Methods: The currently valid criteria with respect to the indications for CXL in keratoconus, PubMed search for relevant publications and own experiences with different CXL protocols are presented.
Results: The reproducibility of topographic parameters depends on the stage of the keratoconus. Accelerated CXL as well as transepithelial CXL with a hyperoxic environment show comparable efficiency with shorter surgery time and possibly lower complication rates. Customized CXL with an individualized UV irradiation profile provides improved results with faster epithelial healing. Lower UV energy doses enable CXL to be conducted in eyes with minimal stromal pachymetry of less than 400 µm before irradiation. The combination of CXL with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) provides visual acuity improvements but also increases the risk of visual loss.
Conclusion: Current indication rules for CXL neglect the reduced reproducability of topographic and tomographic measurements in keratoconus. The latest CXL protocols presented here provide a safe alternative with similar and/or better efficacy compared to standard CXL. The combination of CXL with PRK offers an option for visual rehabilitation in patients with contact lens intolerance.
期刊介绍:
Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.