Slovenia: Health System Review.

Q1 Medicine
Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2021-10-01
Tit Albreht, Katherine Polin, Radivoje Pribaković Brinovec, Marjeta Kuhar, Mircha Poldrugovac, Petra Ogrin Rehberger, Valentina Prevolnik Rupel, Pia Vracko
{"title":"Slovenia: Health System Review.","authors":"Tit Albreht,&nbsp;Katherine Polin,&nbsp;Radivoje Pribaković Brinovec,&nbsp;Marjeta Kuhar,&nbsp;Mircha Poldrugovac,&nbsp;Petra Ogrin Rehberger,&nbsp;Valentina Prevolnik Rupel,&nbsp;Pia Vracko","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This analysis of the Slovene health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. Slovenia has a statutory health insurance system with a single public insurer, providing almost universal coverage for a broad benefits package, though some services require relatively high levels of co-insurance (called co-payments in Slovenia). To cover these costs, about 95% of the population liable for cost-sharing purchases complementary, voluntary health insurance. Health expenditure per capita and as a share of GDP has increased slightly, but still trails behind the EU average. Among statutory health insurance countries, Slovenia is rather unique in that it relies almost exclusively on payroll contributions to fund its system, making health sector revenues vulnerable to economic and labour market fluctuations, and population ageing. Important organizational changes are underway or have been implemented, especially in prevention, primary, emergency and long-term care. Access to services is generally good, given wide coverage of statutory health insurance. Further, Slovenia has some of the lowest rates of out-of-pocket and catastrophic spending in the EU, due to extensive uptake of complementary voluntary health insurance. Yet long waiting times for some services are a persistent issue. Though population health has improved in the last decades, health inequalities due to gender, social and economic determinants and geography remain an important challenge. There is variation in health care performance indicators, but Slovenia performs comparatively well for its level of health spending overall. As such, there is clear scope to improve health and efficiency, including balancing population needs when planning health service volumes. Recently, the Slovene health care system was overwhelmed by the demand for COVID-19-related care. The pandemicâs longer-term effects are still unknown, but it has significantly impacted on life expectancy in the short-term and resulted in delayed or forgone consultations and treatments for other health issues, and longer waiting times. Additional challenges, which are necessary to address to ensure long-term sustainability, strengthen resiliency and improve the capacity for service delivery and quality of care of the health system include: 1) health workforce planning; 2) outdated facilities; 3) health system performance assessment; and 4) implementation of current LTC reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This analysis of the Slovene health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. Slovenia has a statutory health insurance system with a single public insurer, providing almost universal coverage for a broad benefits package, though some services require relatively high levels of co-insurance (called co-payments in Slovenia). To cover these costs, about 95% of the population liable for cost-sharing purchases complementary, voluntary health insurance. Health expenditure per capita and as a share of GDP has increased slightly, but still trails behind the EU average. Among statutory health insurance countries, Slovenia is rather unique in that it relies almost exclusively on payroll contributions to fund its system, making health sector revenues vulnerable to economic and labour market fluctuations, and population ageing. Important organizational changes are underway or have been implemented, especially in prevention, primary, emergency and long-term care. Access to services is generally good, given wide coverage of statutory health insurance. Further, Slovenia has some of the lowest rates of out-of-pocket and catastrophic spending in the EU, due to extensive uptake of complementary voluntary health insurance. Yet long waiting times for some services are a persistent issue. Though population health has improved in the last decades, health inequalities due to gender, social and economic determinants and geography remain an important challenge. There is variation in health care performance indicators, but Slovenia performs comparatively well for its level of health spending overall. As such, there is clear scope to improve health and efficiency, including balancing population needs when planning health service volumes. Recently, the Slovene health care system was overwhelmed by the demand for COVID-19-related care. The pandemicâs longer-term effects are still unknown, but it has significantly impacted on life expectancy in the short-term and resulted in delayed or forgone consultations and treatments for other health issues, and longer waiting times. Additional challenges, which are necessary to address to ensure long-term sustainability, strengthen resiliency and improve the capacity for service delivery and quality of care of the health system include: 1) health workforce planning; 2) outdated facilities; 3) health system performance assessment; and 4) implementation of current LTC reform.

斯洛文尼亚:卫生系统审查。
对斯洛文尼亚卫生系统的分析回顾了组织和治理、卫生筹资、卫生保健提供、卫生改革和卫生系统绩效方面的最新发展。斯洛文尼亚有一个法定的健康保险制度,只有一个公共保险公司,为广泛的福利方案提供几乎普遍的覆盖,尽管有些服务需要相对较高的共同保险水平(在斯洛文尼亚称为共同支付)。为了支付这些费用,大约95%的负担分摊费用的人购买了补充的自愿医疗保险。人均医疗支出和占国内生产总值的比例略有增加,但仍落后于欧盟的平均水平。在法定健康保险国家中,斯洛文尼亚相当独特,因为它几乎完全依靠工资缴款来为其制度提供资金,使卫生部门的收入容易受到经济和劳动力市场波动以及人口老龄化的影响。重要的组织变革正在进行或已经实施,特别是在预防、初级、急诊和长期护理方面。由于法定健康保险的覆盖面很广,获得服务的机会一般都很好。此外,由于广泛采用补充性自愿医疗保险,斯洛文尼亚的自付费用和灾难性费用在欧盟中是最低的。然而,某些服务的等待时间过长是一个长期存在的问题。虽然人口健康在过去几十年中有所改善,但由于性别、社会和经济决定因素以及地理因素造成的健康不平等仍然是一项重大挑战。保健绩效指标各不相同,但斯洛文尼亚的总体保健支出水平相对较好。因此,改善健康和效率,包括在规划卫生服务量时平衡人口需求,显然有很大的空间。最近,斯洛文尼亚卫生保健系统因covid -19相关护理需求而不堪重负。大流行病的长期影响尚不清楚,但它在短期内严重影响了预期寿命,并导致其他健康问题的咨询和治疗推迟或放弃,以及等待时间延长。为确保长期可持续性、加强复原力和提高卫生系统提供服务和保健质量的能力,必须应对的其他挑战包括:1)卫生人力规划;2)设施陈旧;3)卫生系统绩效评估;4)当前LTC改革的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信