A systematic review of behaviour change techniques used in interventions to increase physical activity among breast cancer survivors.

IF 2.9
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s12282-021-01323-z
Verity Hailey, Antonio Rojas-Garcia, Angelos P Kassianos
{"title":"A systematic review of behaviour change techniques used in interventions to increase physical activity among breast cancer survivors.","authors":"Verity Hailey, Antonio Rojas-Garcia, Angelos P Kassianos","doi":"10.1007/s12282-021-01323-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence that physical activity (PA) can help reduce recurrence and mortality, many breast cancer survivors are less active than recommended levels. The aim of this systematic review is to advance our understanding of which behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have been used in interventions promoting breast cancer survivors' PA and to evaluate their potential to increase PA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in five databases (Medline; PsycInfo; Embase; CINAHL and Scopus) for studies published between 2005 and 2019. Following a rigorous screening process, 27 studies were retained. These were reviewed and analysed for quality, coded for BCTs (k = 0.65) and interventions categorised according to their potential to increase PA using an established methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of studies were moderate quality (64%). Demonstration on how to perform the behaviour was the most commonly used BCT (n = 23). Adding objects to the environment, (pedometer or accelerometer) was the BCT with the highest potential to increase PA. This was followed by, goal setting and self-monitoring of behaviour. A theory-based approach to evaluation was used in only 59% (n = 16) of the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this review inform which BCTs have the potential to increase PA for breast cancer survivors and inform intervention development. Future research, is encouraged to properly report intervention procedures around dose and frequency of intervention components to allow for review and replication.</p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":"193-208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01323-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence that physical activity (PA) can help reduce recurrence and mortality, many breast cancer survivors are less active than recommended levels. The aim of this systematic review is to advance our understanding of which behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have been used in interventions promoting breast cancer survivors' PA and to evaluate their potential to increase PA.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in five databases (Medline; PsycInfo; Embase; CINAHL and Scopus) for studies published between 2005 and 2019. Following a rigorous screening process, 27 studies were retained. These were reviewed and analysed for quality, coded for BCTs (k = 0.65) and interventions categorised according to their potential to increase PA using an established methodology.

Results: The majority of studies were moderate quality (64%). Demonstration on how to perform the behaviour was the most commonly used BCT (n = 23). Adding objects to the environment, (pedometer or accelerometer) was the BCT with the highest potential to increase PA. This was followed by, goal setting and self-monitoring of behaviour. A theory-based approach to evaluation was used in only 59% (n = 16) of the studies.

Conclusions: The results of this review inform which BCTs have the potential to increase PA for breast cancer survivors and inform intervention development. Future research, is encouraged to properly report intervention procedures around dose and frequency of intervention components to allow for review and replication.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对增加乳腺癌幸存者身体活动的干预措施中使用的行为改变技术进行系统回顾。
背景:尽管有证据表明身体活动(PA)可以帮助减少复发和死亡率,但许多乳腺癌幸存者的活动量低于推荐水平。本系统综述的目的是促进我们对哪些行为改变技术(bct)已用于促进乳腺癌幸存者PA的干预措施的理解,并评估其增加PA的潜力。方法:系统检索5个数据库(Medline;PsycInfo;Embase;检索2005年至2019年间发表的研究。经过严格的筛选,27项研究被保留下来。对其进行了质量审查和分析,对bct进行了编码(k = 0.65),并使用既定方法根据其增加PA的潜力对干预措施进行了分类。结果:大多数研究为中等质量(64%)。如何执行行为的演示是最常用的BCT (n = 23)。在环境中添加物体(计步器或加速度计)是最有可能增加PA的BCT。接下来是目标设定和行为自我监控。只有59% (n = 16)的研究采用了基于理论的评估方法。结论:本综述的结果提示哪些bct有可能增加乳腺癌幸存者的PA,并为干预措施的发展提供信息。鼓励未来的研究适当地报告干预措施的剂量和干预成分的频率,以便进行审查和复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信