[Organization and implementation of occupational health and safety in child day care centers].

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s40664-021-00454-6
Martina Michaelis, Ulrich Stößel, Frank Bieler, Heike Schambortski, Albert Nienhaus
{"title":"[Organization and implementation of occupational health and safety in child day care centers].","authors":"Martina Michaelis,&nbsp;Ulrich Stößel,&nbsp;Frank Bieler,&nbsp;Heike Schambortski,&nbsp;Albert Nienhaus","doi":"10.1007/s40664-021-00454-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and research question: </strong>Physical and mental stress as well as infection hazards of employees in child day care centers require compliance with governmental occupational health and safety (OHS) regulations. How well OHS is organized and how measures are actually implemented are not yet empirically known. This gap was closed with an epidemiological study on the status quo.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In the second half of 2020 a total of 120 managers of day care centers in Germany, mostly church-run, which are member companies of the German Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), were randomly selected and interviewed. This was done by members of the BGW prevention services using a standardized survey instrument. The surveyed aspects (mostly concerning the OHS organization) were summarized in a standardized sum index between 0 and 1 (worst to best occupational health and safety) and analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The requirements for the organization of OHS were fulfilled in many cases. There is still some potential left for improvement in the actual implementation of organized OHS requirements. The standardized sum index is 0.82 (standard deviation 0.16). Of the respondents two thirds rated OHS in their day care center as good/very good in a global item. In free texts, the desire for more information on OHS and better communication between the day care center and the respective provider was frequently expressed.</p><p><strong>Discussion and outlook: </strong>The results confirmed a higher formal quality of OHS as found in other cross-sectional studies. To continuously improve the actual implementation of organized measures, OHS management systems, which are still rarely used in day care centers, could have a supporting effect. Corresponding instruments are available and their use should be more strongly promoted in the future. Limitations of the study include possible bias due to responses to representatives of an institution that is also responsible for OHS inspections.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815014/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40664-021-00454-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and research question: Physical and mental stress as well as infection hazards of employees in child day care centers require compliance with governmental occupational health and safety (OHS) regulations. How well OHS is organized and how measures are actually implemented are not yet empirically known. This gap was closed with an epidemiological study on the status quo.

Material and methods: In the second half of 2020 a total of 120 managers of day care centers in Germany, mostly church-run, which are member companies of the German Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), were randomly selected and interviewed. This was done by members of the BGW prevention services using a standardized survey instrument. The surveyed aspects (mostly concerning the OHS organization) were summarized in a standardized sum index between 0 and 1 (worst to best occupational health and safety) and analyzed descriptively.

Results: The requirements for the organization of OHS were fulfilled in many cases. There is still some potential left for improvement in the actual implementation of organized OHS requirements. The standardized sum index is 0.82 (standard deviation 0.16). Of the respondents two thirds rated OHS in their day care center as good/very good in a global item. In free texts, the desire for more information on OHS and better communication between the day care center and the respective provider was frequently expressed.

Discussion and outlook: The results confirmed a higher formal quality of OHS as found in other cross-sectional studies. To continuously improve the actual implementation of organized measures, OHS management systems, which are still rarely used in day care centers, could have a supporting effect. Corresponding instruments are available and their use should be more strongly promoted in the future. Limitations of the study include possible bias due to responses to representatives of an institution that is also responsible for OHS inspections.

分享
查看原文
[儿童日托中心职业健康与安全的组织和实施]。
背景和研究问题:儿童日托中心员工的身心压力和感染危险需要遵守政府的职业健康与安全(OHS)法规。职业健康安全组织得有多好,措施如何实际实施,还没有经验可知。对现状进行的流行病学研究弥补了这一差距。材料和方法:在2020年下半年,随机抽取了120名德国日托中心的管理人员进行访谈,这些管理人员大多是教会经营的,是德国法定意外保险和预防健康和福利服务(BGW)的成员公司。这是由BGW预防服务的成员使用标准化调查工具完成的。被调查的方面(主要涉及职业健康安全组织)在0到1(最差到最好的职业健康和安全)之间的标准化总和指数中进行了总结,并进行了描述性分析。结果:多数病例均满足职业健康安全组织的要求。在有组织的职业健康安全要求的实际实施中,仍有一些改进的潜力。标准化和指数为0.82(标准差0.16)。在受访者中,三分之二的人认为他们日托中心的职业健康安全在全球项目中是好的/非常好的。在免费文本中,经常表达希望获得更多关于职业健康安全的信息以及日托中心与各自提供者之间更好的沟通。讨论与展望:结果证实职业健康安全的正式质量高于其他横断面研究。为了持续改进有组织措施的实际执行,在日托中心仍然很少使用的OHS管理体系可以起到辅助作用。目前已有相应的文书,今后应更加大力地促进这些文书的使用。该研究的局限性包括对负责OHS检查的机构代表的反应可能存在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信