Next Generation Sequencing of Human Platelet Antigens for Routine Clinical Investigations and Donor Screening

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
J Guglielmino, DE Jackson
{"title":"Next Generation Sequencing of Human Platelet Antigens for Routine Clinical Investigations and Donor Screening","authors":"J Guglielmino,&nbsp;DE Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping is performed in a number of clinical scenarios, including characterization of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia and provision of HPA-matched platelets. Current gold-standard methods for HPA genotyping utilize single nucleotide variant (SNV) based approaches. This review aims to ascertain if next generation sequencing (NGS) has reasonable grounds to replace SNV-based genotyping for HPA systems. A systematic review was conducted following a comprehensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were subjected to screening based on a defined set of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study quality, characteristics and results were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the concordance of HPA genotyping results between NGS and the SNV-based comparators for HPA-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-15. In total, 3374 potentially eligible articles were identified, only 6 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion agreement for the overall concordance of the 6 included studies was shown to be 0.998, 95%CI [0.995, 0.999], <em>P</em> &lt; .001. The discrepancies between HPA genotypes obtained by the two platforms were due to allele dropout in real-time PCR, thus discordant results were in favor of NGS over SNV-based comparators. Currently available platforms for NGS are not without their limitations, including high upfront and ongoing costs, data management and storage, accurate variant calling and availability of appropriately trained staff. Despite the high level of concordance between NGS and current gold-standard methods, these significant challenges mean that NGS is currently not viable as a stand-alone technique for HPA typing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796322000013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping is performed in a number of clinical scenarios, including characterization of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia and provision of HPA-matched platelets. Current gold-standard methods for HPA genotyping utilize single nucleotide variant (SNV) based approaches. This review aims to ascertain if next generation sequencing (NGS) has reasonable grounds to replace SNV-based genotyping for HPA systems. A systematic review was conducted following a comprehensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were subjected to screening based on a defined set of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study quality, characteristics and results were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the concordance of HPA genotyping results between NGS and the SNV-based comparators for HPA-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-15. In total, 3374 potentially eligible articles were identified, only 6 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion agreement for the overall concordance of the 6 included studies was shown to be 0.998, 95%CI [0.995, 0.999], P < .001. The discrepancies between HPA genotypes obtained by the two platforms were due to allele dropout in real-time PCR, thus discordant results were in favor of NGS over SNV-based comparators. Currently available platforms for NGS are not without their limitations, including high upfront and ongoing costs, data management and storage, accurate variant calling and availability of appropriately trained staff. Despite the high level of concordance between NGS and current gold-standard methods, these significant challenges mean that NGS is currently not viable as a stand-alone technique for HPA typing.

用于常规临床调查和供体筛选的下一代人血小板抗原测序
人类血小板抗原(HPA)基因分型在许多临床情况下进行,包括免疫介导的血小板减少症的表征和提供HPA匹配的血小板。目前HPA基因分型的金标准方法是基于单核苷酸变异(SNV)的方法。本综述旨在确定下一代测序(NGS)是否有合理的理由取代基于snv的HPA系统基因分型。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行全面的文献检索后进行系统评价。根据一套确定的纳入/排除标准对研究进行筛选。提取研究质量、特征和结果,并进行meta分析,评估NGS与基于snv的HPA-1、-2、-3、-4、-5、-15比较物基因分型结果的一致性。总共有3374篇潜在符合条件的文章被确定,其中只有6篇被纳入meta分析。纳入的6项研究总体一致性的合并比例一致性为0.998,95%CI [0.995, 0.999], P <措施。两种平台获得的HPA基因型之间的差异是由于实时PCR中的等位基因缺失造成的,因此NGS与基于snv的比较器的结果不一致。目前可用的NGS平台并非没有其局限性,包括高昂的前期和持续成本、数据管理和存储、准确的变体调用以及受过适当培训的工作人员的可用性。尽管NGS与目前的金标准方法高度一致,但这些重大挑战意味着NGS目前不能作为HPA分型的独立技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信