Occupation and prostate Cancer risk: results from the epidemiological study of prostate cancer (EPICAP).

Wendy Bijoux, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Soumaya Balbolia, Pierre-Jean Lamy, Xavier Rebillard, Brigitte Tretarre, Sylvie Cenee, Florence Menegaux
{"title":"Occupation and prostate Cancer risk: results from the epidemiological study of prostate cancer (EPICAP).","authors":"Wendy Bijoux,&nbsp;Emilie Cordina-Duverger,&nbsp;Soumaya Balbolia,&nbsp;Pierre-Jean Lamy,&nbsp;Xavier Rebillard,&nbsp;Brigitte Tretarre,&nbsp;Sylvie Cenee,&nbsp;Florence Menegaux","doi":"10.1186/s12995-022-00346-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent male cancer in industrialized countries, little is known about its aetiology. The literature has suggested an influence of the environment, including occupational exposures, but results are inconsistent. In this context, we investigated PCa risk associated to employment among several occupations using data from EPICAP study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EPICAP is a French population-based case-control study including 819 PCa incident cases and 879 controls frequency-matched on age. In-person interviews gathered data on potential risk factors and lifetime occupational histories for each job held at least 6 months. Then, occupations were coded using ISCO 68. Unconditional logistic regressions were performed to assess the association between occupations (ever occupied and by duration) and PCa risk, whether all and aggressive, after adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ≥10 years of employment, we found positive associations with PCa, whether overall and aggressive, among Medical, Dental and Veterinary workers (OR (odds ratios) =5.01 [95% confidence interval] [1.27; 19.77]), Members of the armed forces (OR = 5.14 [0.99; 26.71]) and Fishermen, hunters and related workers (OR = 4.58 [1.33; 15.78]); whether overall and non-aggressive PCa, among Legislative officials and Government administrators (OR = 3.30 [1.10; 9.84]) or Managers (OR = 1.68 [1.18; 2.41]); however a negative association, whether overall and non-aggressive PCa, among Material-Handling and Related Equipment Operators, Dockers and Freight Handlers (OR = 0.40 [0.17; 0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Excess PCa risks were observed in the EPICAP study mostly among white collar workers exposed to several factors in their work environment. These emerging associations can be used to lead future research investigating specific occupational exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":318500,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819870/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-022-00346-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Although prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent male cancer in industrialized countries, little is known about its aetiology. The literature has suggested an influence of the environment, including occupational exposures, but results are inconsistent. In this context, we investigated PCa risk associated to employment among several occupations using data from EPICAP study.

Methods: EPICAP is a French population-based case-control study including 819 PCa incident cases and 879 controls frequency-matched on age. In-person interviews gathered data on potential risk factors and lifetime occupational histories for each job held at least 6 months. Then, occupations were coded using ISCO 68. Unconditional logistic regressions were performed to assess the association between occupations (ever occupied and by duration) and PCa risk, whether all and aggressive, after adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: For ≥10 years of employment, we found positive associations with PCa, whether overall and aggressive, among Medical, Dental and Veterinary workers (OR (odds ratios) =5.01 [95% confidence interval] [1.27; 19.77]), Members of the armed forces (OR = 5.14 [0.99; 26.71]) and Fishermen, hunters and related workers (OR = 4.58 [1.33; 15.78]); whether overall and non-aggressive PCa, among Legislative officials and Government administrators (OR = 3.30 [1.10; 9.84]) or Managers (OR = 1.68 [1.18; 2.41]); however a negative association, whether overall and non-aggressive PCa, among Material-Handling and Related Equipment Operators, Dockers and Freight Handlers (OR = 0.40 [0.17; 0.97]).

Conclusion: Excess PCa risks were observed in the EPICAP study mostly among white collar workers exposed to several factors in their work environment. These emerging associations can be used to lead future research investigating specific occupational exposures.

职业与前列腺癌风险:来自前列腺癌流行病学研究(EPICAP)的结果
背景:虽然前列腺癌(PCa)是工业化国家最常见的男性癌症,但对其病因知之甚少。文献表明环境的影响,包括职业暴露,但结果不一致。在此背景下,我们使用EPICAP研究的数据调查了几种职业中PCa与就业相关的风险。方法:EPICAP是一项基于法国人群的病例对照研究,包括819例PCa病例和879例年龄频率匹配的对照。面对面的访谈收集了每一份工作至少6个月的潜在风险因素和终身职业经历的数据。然后,用ISCO 68对职业进行编码。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,进行了无条件逻辑回归来评估职业(曾经占领和持续时间)与PCa风险之间的关系,无论是所有的还是侵略性的。结果:对于≥10年的工作,我们发现医疗、牙科和兽医工作者与PCa呈正相关,无论是总体的还是侵略性的(OR(比值比)=5.01[95%置信区间][1.27;19.77]),武装部队成员(OR = 5.14 [0.99;26.71])和渔民、猎人和相关工人(OR = 4.58 [1.33;15.78]);立法官员和政府行政人员的总体和非侵略性PCa (OR = 3.30 [1.10;9.84])或经理(or = 1.68 [1.18;2.41]);然而,在物料搬运和相关设备操作员、码头工人和货物搬运工之间,无论是总体的还是非侵略性的PCa,都存在负相关(OR = 0.40 [0.17;0.97])。结论:在EPICAP研究中观察到的过量PCa风险主要发生在工作环境中暴露于多种因素的白领工人中。这些新出现的关联可以用来引导未来对特定职业暴露的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信