Surgical exploration for stable patients with penetrating cardiac box injuries: When and how? A cohort of 155 patients from Marseille area.

Matthieu Vasse, Yaniss Belaroussi, Jean-Philippe Avaro, Nazim Biri, Antoine Lerner, Pascal-Alexandre Thomas, Henri de Lesquen
{"title":"Surgical exploration for stable patients with penetrating cardiac box injuries: When and how? A cohort of 155 patients from Marseille area.","authors":"Matthieu Vasse,&nbsp;Yaniss Belaroussi,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Avaro,&nbsp;Nazim Biri,&nbsp;Antoine Lerner,&nbsp;Pascal-Alexandre Thomas,&nbsp;Henri de Lesquen","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000003561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of penetrating thoracic injuries in moribund or unstable patients is clearly described in contrast to that of stable patients, particularly for those with a cardiac box injury. This anatomic location suggests a potentially lethal cardiac injury and requires urgent therapeutic decision making. The present study aims at determining when surgical exploration is beneficial for stable patients presenting with penetrating cardiac box injuries (PCBIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of stable civilian patients with PCBI referred to level I trauma centers in the Marseille area between January 2009 and December 2019. Using post hoc analysis of the management outcomes, patients whose surgery was considered therapeutic (group A) were compared with those whose surgery was considered nontherapeutic and with nonoperated patients (group B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 155 patients with PCBI were included, with 88% (n = 137) of stab wound injuries. Overall, surgical exploration was performed in 54% (n = 83), considered therapeutic in 71% (n = 59), and performed by video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery in 42% (n = 35) with a conversion rates of 14% (n = 5). Initial extended fast assessment with sonography for trauma revealed the presence of hemopericardium in 29% (n = 29) in group A versus 9.5% (n = 7) in group B, p = 0.010, and was associated with a negative predictive value of 93% regarding the presence of a cardiac injury. Chest tube flow was significantly higher in patients who required surgery, with a median (interquartile range) of 600.00 (350.00-1200.00) mL versus 300.0 (150.00-400.00) mL ( p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extended fast assessment with sonography for trauma and chest tube flow are the cornerstones of the management of stable PCBI. Video-assisted thoracoscopy represents an interesting approach to check intrathoracic wounds while minimizing surgical morbidity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":501845,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"394-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The management of penetrating thoracic injuries in moribund or unstable patients is clearly described in contrast to that of stable patients, particularly for those with a cardiac box injury. This anatomic location suggests a potentially lethal cardiac injury and requires urgent therapeutic decision making. The present study aims at determining when surgical exploration is beneficial for stable patients presenting with penetrating cardiac box injuries (PCBIs).

Methods: This was a retrospective study of stable civilian patients with PCBI referred to level I trauma centers in the Marseille area between January 2009 and December 2019. Using post hoc analysis of the management outcomes, patients whose surgery was considered therapeutic (group A) were compared with those whose surgery was considered nontherapeutic and with nonoperated patients (group B).

Results: A total of 155 patients with PCBI were included, with 88% (n = 137) of stab wound injuries. Overall, surgical exploration was performed in 54% (n = 83), considered therapeutic in 71% (n = 59), and performed by video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery in 42% (n = 35) with a conversion rates of 14% (n = 5). Initial extended fast assessment with sonography for trauma revealed the presence of hemopericardium in 29% (n = 29) in group A versus 9.5% (n = 7) in group B, p = 0.010, and was associated with a negative predictive value of 93% regarding the presence of a cardiac injury. Chest tube flow was significantly higher in patients who required surgery, with a median (interquartile range) of 600.00 (350.00-1200.00) mL versus 300.0 (150.00-400.00) mL ( p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Extended fast assessment with sonography for trauma and chest tube flow are the cornerstones of the management of stable PCBI. Video-assisted thoracoscopy represents an interesting approach to check intrathoracic wounds while minimizing surgical morbidity.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

稳定型穿透性心箱损伤患者的手术探查:时间和方式?来自马赛地区的155例患者。
背景:垂死或不稳定患者的胸椎穿透伤的处理与稳定患者的处理有明显的不同,特别是对于那些有心脏箱损伤的患者。这个解剖位置提示潜在的致命心脏损伤,需要紧急的治疗决策。本研究旨在确定手术探查何时对表现为穿透性心箱损伤(PCBIs)的稳定患者有利。方法:对2009年1月至2019年12月在马赛地区一级创伤中心转诊的稳定平民PCBI患者进行回顾性研究。对治疗结果进行事后分析,将手术治疗的患者(A组)与非手术治疗的患者和非手术治疗的患者(B组)进行比较。结果:共纳入155例PCBI患者,其中88% (n = 137)为刀伤。总体而言,手术探索了在54% (n = 83),被认为是71% (n = 59),治疗和由电视胸腔镜手术在42% (n = 35)的转化率为14% (n = 5)。最初的扩展与超声快速评估创伤显示心包积血的存在在29% (n = 29) a组与B组(n = 7) 9.5%, p = 0.010,与93%的阴性预测价值有关的心脏损伤。需要手术的患者胸管流量明显更高,中位数(四分位数范围)为600.00 (350.00-1200.00)mL,而300.00 (150.00-400.00)mL (p = 0.001)。结论:超声对创伤和胸管血流的扩展快速评估是稳定PCBI治疗的基础。视频胸腔镜是一种检查胸内伤口的有趣方法,同时将手术发病率降至最低。证据水平:治疗/护理管理;IV级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信