Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic patterns of aminoglycoside resistance in the Gram-negative bacteria isolates collected from pediatric and general hospitals.

IF 2.4 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Leila Azimi, Shahnaz Armin, Hossein Samadi Kafil, Nafiseh Abdollahi, Kiarash Ghazvini, Sepide Hasanzadeh, Shahram Shahraki Zahedani, Sedigheh Rafiei Tabatabaei, Fatemeh Fallah
{"title":"Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic patterns of aminoglycoside resistance in the Gram-negative bacteria isolates collected from pediatric and general hospitals.","authors":"Leila Azimi,&nbsp;Shahnaz Armin,&nbsp;Hossein Samadi Kafil,&nbsp;Nafiseh Abdollahi,&nbsp;Kiarash Ghazvini,&nbsp;Sepide Hasanzadeh,&nbsp;Shahram Shahraki Zahedani,&nbsp;Sedigheh Rafiei Tabatabaei,&nbsp;Fatemeh Fallah","doi":"10.1186/s40348-022-00134-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the phenotypic and genotypic patterns of aminoglycoside resistance among the Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolates collected from pediatric and general hospitals in Iran. A total of 836 clinical isolates of GNB were collected from pediatric and general hospitals from January 2018 to the end of December 2019. The identification of bacterial isolates was performed by conventional biochemical tests. Susceptibility to aminoglycosides was evaluated by the disk diffusion method (DDM). The frequency of genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) was screened by the PCR method via specific primers. Among all pediatric and general hospitals, the predominant GNB isolates were Acinetobacter spp. (n = 327) and Escherichia coli (n = 144). However, E. coli (n = 20/144; 13.9%) had the highest frequency in clinical samples collected from pediatrics. The DDM results showed that 64.3% of all GNB were resistant to all of the tested aminoglycoside agents. Acinetobacter spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae with 93.6%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 93.4%, and Enterobacter spp. with 86.5% exhibited very high levels of resistance to gentamicin. Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic against E. coli isolates. In total, the results showed that the aac (6')-Ib gene with 59% had the highest frequency among genes encoding AMEs in GNB. The frequency of the surveyed aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes among all GNB was found as follows: aph (3')-VIe (48.7%), aadA15 (38.6%), aph (3')-Ia (31.3%), aph (3')-II (14.4%), and aph (6) (2.6%). The obtained data demonstrated that the phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance among GNB was quite high and it is possible that the resistance genes may frequently spread among clinical isolates of GNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":74215,"journal":{"name":"Molecular and cellular pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816979/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular and cellular pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-022-00134-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the phenotypic and genotypic patterns of aminoglycoside resistance among the Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolates collected from pediatric and general hospitals in Iran. A total of 836 clinical isolates of GNB were collected from pediatric and general hospitals from January 2018 to the end of December 2019. The identification of bacterial isolates was performed by conventional biochemical tests. Susceptibility to aminoglycosides was evaluated by the disk diffusion method (DDM). The frequency of genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) was screened by the PCR method via specific primers. Among all pediatric and general hospitals, the predominant GNB isolates were Acinetobacter spp. (n = 327) and Escherichia coli (n = 144). However, E. coli (n = 20/144; 13.9%) had the highest frequency in clinical samples collected from pediatrics. The DDM results showed that 64.3% of all GNB were resistant to all of the tested aminoglycoside agents. Acinetobacter spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae with 93.6%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 93.4%, and Enterobacter spp. with 86.5% exhibited very high levels of resistance to gentamicin. Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic against E. coli isolates. In total, the results showed that the aac (6')-Ib gene with 59% had the highest frequency among genes encoding AMEs in GNB. The frequency of the surveyed aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes among all GNB was found as follows: aph (3')-VIe (48.7%), aadA15 (38.6%), aph (3')-Ia (31.3%), aph (3')-II (14.4%), and aph (6) (2.6%). The obtained data demonstrated that the phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance among GNB was quite high and it is possible that the resistance genes may frequently spread among clinical isolates of GNB.

从儿科和综合医院收集的革兰氏阴性菌氨基糖苷耐药表型和基因型模式的评估。
本研究的目的是评估从伊朗儿科和综合医院收集的革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)株氨基糖苷耐药的表型和基因型模式。2018年1月至2019年12月底,在儿科和综合医院共收集到GNB临床分离株836株。采用常规生化试验对分离菌进行鉴定。采用圆盘扩散法(DDM)评价其对氨基糖苷类药物的敏感性。通过特异性引物,采用PCR方法筛选氨基糖苷修饰酶(AMEs)编码基因的频率。在所有儿科和综合医院中,GNB的主要分离株为不动杆菌(n = 327)和大肠杆菌(n = 144)。然而,大肠杆菌(n = 20/144;13.9%)在儿科收集的临床样本中频率最高。DDM结果显示,64.3%的GNB对所有氨基糖苷类药物均耐药。不动杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌(93.6%)、铜绿假单胞菌(93.4%)和肠杆菌(86.5%)对庆大霉素表现出非常高的耐药水平。阿米卡星是对大肠杆菌分离株最有效的抗生素。结果表明,在GNB中编码AMEs的基因中,aac(6’)-Ib基因的频率最高,占59%。氨基糖苷修饰酶基因在所有GNB中的频率分别为:aph(3′)-VIe(48.7%)、aadA15(38.6%)、aph(3′)-Ia(31.3%)、aph(3′)-II(14.4%)和aph(6)(2.6%)。结果表明,GNB的表型和基因型氨基糖苷耐药较高,耐药基因可能在GNB临床分离株中频繁传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信