Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group.

Yosai Mori, Tomofusa Yamauchi, Shota Tokuda, Keiichiro Minami, Hitoshi Tabuchi, Kazunori Miyata
{"title":"Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group.","authors":"Yosai Mori,&nbsp;Tomofusa Yamauchi,&nbsp;Shota Tokuda,&nbsp;Keiichiro Minami,&nbsp;Hitoshi Tabuchi,&nbsp;Kazunori Miyata","doi":"10.1186/s40662-021-00265-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To examine the effectiveness of the use of machine learning for adapting an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for a patient group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 1,611 eyes of 1,169 Japanese patients who received a single model of monofocal IOL (SN60WF, Alcon) at Miyata Eye Hospital were reviewed and analyzed. Using biometric metrics and postoperative refractions of 1211 eyes of 769 patients, constants of the SRK/T and Haigis formulas were optimized. The SRK/T formula was adapted using a support vector regressor. Prediction errors in the use of adapted formulas as well as the SRK/T, Haigis, Hill-RBF and Barrett Universal II formulas were evaluated with data from 395 eyes of 395 distinct patients. Mean prediction errors, median absolute errors, and percentages of eyes within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D, and over + 0.50 D of errors were compared among formulas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean prediction errors in the use of the SRT/K and adapted formulas were smaller than the use of other formulas (P < 0.001). In the absolute errors, the Hill-RBF and adapted methods were better than others. The performance of the Barrett Universal II was not better than the others for the patient group. There were the least eyes with hyperopic refractive errors (16.5%) in the use of the adapted formula.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adapting IOL power calculations using machine learning technology with data from a particular patient group was effective and promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591948/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00265-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: To examine the effectiveness of the use of machine learning for adapting an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for a patient group.

Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 1,611 eyes of 1,169 Japanese patients who received a single model of monofocal IOL (SN60WF, Alcon) at Miyata Eye Hospital were reviewed and analyzed. Using biometric metrics and postoperative refractions of 1211 eyes of 769 patients, constants of the SRK/T and Haigis formulas were optimized. The SRK/T formula was adapted using a support vector regressor. Prediction errors in the use of adapted formulas as well as the SRK/T, Haigis, Hill-RBF and Barrett Universal II formulas were evaluated with data from 395 eyes of 395 distinct patients. Mean prediction errors, median absolute errors, and percentages of eyes within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D, and over + 0.50 D of errors were compared among formulas.

Results: The mean prediction errors in the use of the SRT/K and adapted formulas were smaller than the use of other formulas (P < 0.001). In the absolute errors, the Hill-RBF and adapted methods were better than others. The performance of the Barrett Universal II was not better than the others for the patient group. There were the least eyes with hyperopic refractive errors (16.5%) in the use of the adapted formula.

Conclusions: Adapting IOL power calculations using machine learning technology with data from a particular patient group was effective and promising.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工晶状体度数计算的机器学习适应。
背景:研究使用机器学习计算人工晶状体(IOL)度数的有效性。方法:回顾性分析日本宫田眼科医院1169例接受单一型号单焦点人工晶体(SN60WF, Alcon)的患者1611只眼的临床资料。利用769例患者1211只眼的生物特征和术后屈光,对SRK/T常数和Haigis公式进行优化。使用支持向量回归器调整SRK/T公式。使用适应性配方以及SRK/T、Haigis、Hill-RBF和Barrett通用II配方的预测误差评估来自395名不同患者的395只眼睛的数据。比较各公式误差在±0.25 D、±0.50 D、±1.00 D和超过+ 0.50 D范围内的平均预测误差、中位数绝对误差和眼睛百分比。结果:使用SRT/K和调整公式的平均预测误差小于使用其他公式(P)结论:使用机器学习技术对特定患者组的数据进行人工晶状体度数计算是有效和有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信