Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis.

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tarun Jella, Austin Fernstrum, Michael Callegari, Thomas B Cwalina, Wade Muncey, Amr Mahran, Benjamin Petrinic, Al Ray, Heba Elghalban, Mostafa Abdelrazek, Aram Loeb, Nannan Thirumavalavan, Shubham Gupta
{"title":"Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis.","authors":"Tarun Jella,&nbsp;Austin Fernstrum,&nbsp;Michael Callegari,&nbsp;Thomas B Cwalina,&nbsp;Wade Muncey,&nbsp;Amr Mahran,&nbsp;Benjamin Petrinic,&nbsp;Al Ray,&nbsp;Heba Elghalban,&nbsp;Mostafa Abdelrazek,&nbsp;Aram Loeb,&nbsp;Nannan Thirumavalavan,&nbsp;Shubham Gupta","doi":"10.5152/tud.2021.21204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate differences in perioperative clinical outcomes in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in primary versus replacement settings. Secondarily, we aimed to identify patient-related factors contributing to complications associated with AUS placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed between 2010 and 2018 identifying males undergoing AUS implantation. Subjects were further subdivided into primary implantation or removal/replacement of AUS simultaneously via current procedural terminology codes 53445 and 53447, respectively. 30-Day postoperative outcomes were compared between cohorts using t-test and Fisher's exact test. The relationship between patient factors and complications was evaluated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,892 patients were identified: 1,445 primary AUS placement and 447 AUS replacement procedures. Patients undergoing AUS replacement were statistically older than those undergoing primary implantation (71.4 vs 69.7 years, P < .001). AUS replacement procedures were associated with an increased rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) compared to primary procedures (1.3% vs 0.4%, P ¼ .042). There were no differences identified between cohorts for deep SSI, cardiopulmonary complications, reoperation, operative time, or length of stay. Logistic regression demonstrated that higher body mass index was found to be independent risk factors for any complications, and diabetes mellitus was associated with increased risk of AUS-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the perioperative period, patients undergoing replacement AUS have an increased risk of superficial SSI compared to primary AUS implantation. These findings can assist with appropriate perioperative counseling of patients undergoing primary and replacement AUS implantations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/96/tju-47-5-427.PMC9612775.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate differences in perioperative clinical outcomes in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in primary versus replacement settings. Secondarily, we aimed to identify patient-related factors contributing to complications associated with AUS placement.

Materials and methods: A review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed between 2010 and 2018 identifying males undergoing AUS implantation. Subjects were further subdivided into primary implantation or removal/replacement of AUS simultaneously via current procedural terminology codes 53445 and 53447, respectively. 30-Day postoperative outcomes were compared between cohorts using t-test and Fisher's exact test. The relationship between patient factors and complications was evaluated using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 1,892 patients were identified: 1,445 primary AUS placement and 447 AUS replacement procedures. Patients undergoing AUS replacement were statistically older than those undergoing primary implantation (71.4 vs 69.7 years, P < .001). AUS replacement procedures were associated with an increased rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) compared to primary procedures (1.3% vs 0.4%, P ¼ .042). There were no differences identified between cohorts for deep SSI, cardiopulmonary complications, reoperation, operative time, or length of stay. Logistic regression demonstrated that higher body mass index was found to be independent risk factors for any complications, and diabetes mellitus was associated with increased risk of AUS-related readmission.

Conclusion: Within the perioperative period, patients undergoing replacement AUS have an increased risk of superficial SSI compared to primary AUS implantation. These findings can assist with appropriate perioperative counseling of patients undergoing primary and replacement AUS implantations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

初次和置换人工尿括约肌手术的围手术期结果:ACS-NSQIP分析。
目的:评价男性人工尿括约肌(AUS)植入术与替代植入术围手术期临床结果的差异。其次,我们的目的是确定与AUS放置相关的并发症的患者相关因素。材料和方法:回顾2010年至2018年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划,确定接受AUS植入的男性。受试者被进一步细分为首次植入或同时移除/替换AUS,分别通过现行的手术术语代码53445和53447。采用t检验和Fisher精确检验比较各组术后30天的预后。采用logistic回归评估患者因素与并发症的关系。结果:共有1892例患者被确定:1445例初始AUS放置和447例AUS替换手术。接受AUS置换的患者比接受初次植入术的患者年龄大(71.4岁vs 69.7岁,P < 0.001)。与初次手术相比,AUS替代手术与浅表手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率增加相关(1.3% vs 0.4%, P . 0.042)。在深SSI、心肺并发症、再手术、手术时间或住院时间方面,各组间没有发现差异。Logistic回归分析显示,较高的体重指数是任何并发症的独立危险因素,糖尿病与aus相关再入院风险增加相关。结论:在围手术期,与初次植入AUS相比,更换AUS的患者发生浅表SSI的风险增加。这些发现可以帮助初次和置换AUS植入术患者进行适当的围手术期咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信