Chemoresection by mitomycin C compared to transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with recurrent nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Abdalla Ali Deb, Ayman Agag, Naufal Naushad, Rajbabu Krishnamoorthy, Hosam Serag
{"title":"Chemoresection by mitomycin C compared to transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with recurrent nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdalla Ali Deb, Ayman Agag, Naufal Naushad, Rajbabu Krishnamoorthy, Hosam Serag","doi":"10.5152/tju.2021.21086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some studies suggest that chemoresection with mitomycin C (MMC) is comparable to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in the management of recurrent nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of MMC and TURBT in recurrent NMIBC. A search was conducted for studies published in English in the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest, System for information on Grey Literature, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with no publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials and Risk of Bias inNon-Randomized Studies of Interventions-I tool for observational studies. Data analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.4 software. Three studies were included in this systematic review(total participants is 291); two studieswere included in themeta-analysis. The rate of complete response was significantly lower in MMC group compared with TURBT (relative risk [RR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.67, P< .001). The rates of local adverse events were lower inMMC, with a statistical significance for dysuria (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.84, P ¼ .006), urinary frequency (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43- 0.84, P¼ .003), cystitis (RR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06-0.81, P¼ .02), and incontinence (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.96, P¼ .04). In terms of complete response, TURBT is superior to chemoresection withMMC. Currently, chemoresection withMMC should be restricted to patients unfit for surgery and in clinical trials. Future randomized controlled trials are recommended to confirm or refute the use ofMMC in treating recurrent NMIBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":"47 4","pages":"260-269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612758/pdf/tju-47-4-260.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tju.2021.21086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some studies suggest that chemoresection with mitomycin C (MMC) is comparable to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in the management of recurrent nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of MMC and TURBT in recurrent NMIBC. A search was conducted for studies published in English in the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest, System for information on Grey Literature, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with no publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials and Risk of Bias inNon-Randomized Studies of Interventions-I tool for observational studies. Data analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.4 software. Three studies were included in this systematic review(total participants is 291); two studieswere included in themeta-analysis. The rate of complete response was significantly lower in MMC group compared with TURBT (relative risk [RR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.67, P< .001). The rates of local adverse events were lower inMMC, with a statistical significance for dysuria (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.84, P ¼ .006), urinary frequency (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43- 0.84, P¼ .003), cystitis (RR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06-0.81, P¼ .02), and incontinence (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.96, P¼ .04). In terms of complete response, TURBT is superior to chemoresection withMMC. Currently, chemoresection withMMC should be restricted to patients unfit for surgery and in clinical trials. Future randomized controlled trials are recommended to confirm or refute the use ofMMC in treating recurrent NMIBC.

Abstract Image

丝裂霉素 C 切除术与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术对复发性非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的治疗效果比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
一些研究表明,在治疗复发性非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)方面,使用丝裂霉素 C(MMC)进行化学切除与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)效果相当。在这项荟萃分析中,我们比较了 MMC 和 TURBT 对复发性 NMIBC 的疗效和安全性。我们在 MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science、Google Scholar、ProQuest、System for information on Grey Literature 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 等电子数据库中检索了以英文发表的研究,没有出版日期限制。对随机对照试验采用 "偏倚风险2 "工具评估偏倚风险,对观察性研究采用 "非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险-I "工具评估偏倚风险。数据分析使用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行。本系统综述纳入了三项研究(总参与人数为 291 人);两份研究纳入了eta 分析。与 TURBT 相比,MMC 组的完全缓解率明显较低(相对风险 [RR]: 0.55,95% 置信区间 [RR]: 0.55):0.55, 95% 置信区间 (CI): 0.45-0.67, P< .001)。MMC组的局部不良反应发生率较低,其中排尿困难(RR:0.55,95% CI:0.36-0.84,P¼ .006)、尿频(RR:0.60,95% CI:0.43-0.84,P¼ .003)、膀胱炎(RR:0.22,95% CI:0.06-0.81,P¼ .02)和尿失禁(RR:0.48,95% CI:0.24-0.96,P¼ .04)具有统计学意义。在完全缓解方面,TURBT优于使用MMC的化学切口。目前,MMC 切开术应仅限于不适合手术的患者和临床试验。建议今后进行随机对照试验,以证实或反驳使用 MMC 治疗复发性 NMIBC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信