A Single Approach for Management of Fractures Involving Both Columns of the Acetabulum: A Case Series of 23 Patients.

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Atul Patil, Dheeraj S Attarde, Askhar Haphiz, Parag Sancheti, Ashok Shyam
{"title":"A Single Approach for Management of Fractures Involving Both Columns of the Acetabulum: A Case Series of 23 Patients.","authors":"Atul Patil,&nbsp;Dheeraj S Attarde,&nbsp;Askhar Haphiz,&nbsp;Parag Sancheti,&nbsp;Ashok Shyam","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>To study the radiological and functional outcomes as well as complications in the management of fractures involving both columns of the acetabulum using a single surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Type IV, prospective clinical study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level I trauma centre.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patients over 20 year of age and (b) patients suffering from acetabular fractures involving both columns as per Letournel and Judet classification, namely transverse, transverse + posterior wall, T type, anterior column posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) and associated both columns. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patient suffering from isolated anterior column, posterior column, anterior wall, posterior wall and posterior wall + column fractures; (b) patient who have undergone surgical procedures of the hip prior to trauma; and (c) compound acetabular fractures. A total of 23 patients having both column acetabulum fractures were included prospectively from June 2016 to December 2018 and followed up till 1 year postoperatively. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed through one of three described approaches, i.e., iliofemoral, Kocher-Langenbeck, and anterior intrapelvic or ilioinguinal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study population consisted of 30.4% transverse, 39.1% associated both columns, 21.7% T type and 8.7% anterior column + posterior hemi-transverse. Of these, 65.2% were operated using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, while 30.4% of patients required the anterior intrapelvic approach. The remaining 4.3% of patients were operated by the iliofemoral approach. Anatomic reduction was achieved in 100% of our study population with remaining displacement less than or equal to 1°mm. At 1-year follow-up, all fractures showed a satisfactory union with an excellent Matta index in 100% study subjects. Complications at 1 year included one case of foot drop, which was present preoperatively but failed to improve and one case of post-traumatic arthritis. Average Harris Hip score (HHS) and mean Merle D'Aubigne (MDA) scores suggested good clinical outcomes in the study population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single approach can be used to achieve good functional and radiological outcomes in carefully selected bicolumnar fractures of the acetabulum, with less approach-related morbidity.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Traditionally, multiple approaches are used for acetabulum fractures involving both columns, but with proper patient selection, single approach can be used with good functional and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Patil A, Attarde DS, Haphiz A, <i>et al.</i> A Single Approach for Management of Fractures Involving Both Columns of the Acetabulum: A Case Series of 23 Patients. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(3):152-160.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"16 3","pages":"152-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/46/d2/stlr-16-152.PMC8778726.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and objective: To study the radiological and functional outcomes as well as complications in the management of fractures involving both columns of the acetabulum using a single surgical approach.

Design: Type IV, prospective clinical study.

Setting: Level I trauma centre.

Materials and methods: Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patients over 20 year of age and (b) patients suffering from acetabular fractures involving both columns as per Letournel and Judet classification, namely transverse, transverse + posterior wall, T type, anterior column posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) and associated both columns. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patient suffering from isolated anterior column, posterior column, anterior wall, posterior wall and posterior wall + column fractures; (b) patient who have undergone surgical procedures of the hip prior to trauma; and (c) compound acetabular fractures. A total of 23 patients having both column acetabulum fractures were included prospectively from June 2016 to December 2018 and followed up till 1 year postoperatively. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed through one of three described approaches, i.e., iliofemoral, Kocher-Langenbeck, and anterior intrapelvic or ilioinguinal.

Results: Our study population consisted of 30.4% transverse, 39.1% associated both columns, 21.7% T type and 8.7% anterior column + posterior hemi-transverse. Of these, 65.2% were operated using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, while 30.4% of patients required the anterior intrapelvic approach. The remaining 4.3% of patients were operated by the iliofemoral approach. Anatomic reduction was achieved in 100% of our study population with remaining displacement less than or equal to 1°mm. At 1-year follow-up, all fractures showed a satisfactory union with an excellent Matta index in 100% study subjects. Complications at 1 year included one case of foot drop, which was present preoperatively but failed to improve and one case of post-traumatic arthritis. Average Harris Hip score (HHS) and mean Merle D'Aubigne (MDA) scores suggested good clinical outcomes in the study population.

Conclusions: A single approach can be used to achieve good functional and radiological outcomes in carefully selected bicolumnar fractures of the acetabulum, with less approach-related morbidity.

Clinical significance: Traditionally, multiple approaches are used for acetabulum fractures involving both columns, but with proper patient selection, single approach can be used with good functional and surgical outcomes.

How to cite this article: Patil A, Attarde DS, Haphiz A, et al. A Single Approach for Management of Fractures Involving Both Columns of the Acetabulum: A Case Series of 23 Patients. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(3):152-160.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单一入路治疗髋臼双柱骨折:23例病例分析。
目的和目的:探讨单路手术治疗髋臼双柱骨折的影像学和功能预后及并发症。设计:IV型前瞻性临床研究。环境:一级创伤中心。材料和方法:纳入标准为:(a)年龄大于20岁的患者;(b)髋臼双柱骨折患者,根据Letournel和Judet分类,即横、横+后壁、T型、前柱后半横(ACPHT)及相关双柱。排除标准为:(a)孤立性前柱、后柱、前壁、后壁及后壁+柱骨折患者;(b)创伤前曾接受过髋关节手术的患者;(c)复合髋臼骨折。前瞻性纳入2016年6月至2018年12月髋臼双柱骨折患者23例,随访至术后1年。通过三种入路之一进行切开复位和内固定,即髂股入路、Kocher-Langenbeck入路和骨盆前路或髂腹股沟入路。结果:我们的研究人群包括30.4%的横柱,39.1%的双柱相关,21.7%的T型和8.7%的前柱+后半横。其中65.2%的患者采用Kocher-Langenbeck入路,而30.4%的患者需要盆腔内前入路。其余4.3%的患者采用髂股入路手术。100%的研究人群实现了解剖复位,剩余移位小于或等于1°mm。在1年的随访中,100%的研究对象骨折愈合良好,Matta指数优异。1年的并发症包括1例足下垂,术前存在但未能改善,1例创伤后关节炎。平均Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和平均Merle D'Aubigne评分(MDA)表明研究人群的临床结果良好。结论:对于精心选择的髋臼双柱骨折,采用单一入路可获得良好的功能和影像学结果,且与入路相关的发病率较低。临床意义:传统上,涉及双柱的髋臼骨折采用多种入路,但如果患者选择得当,单一入路可获得良好的功能和手术效果。本文引用方式:Patil A, Attarde DS, Haphiz A等。单一入路治疗髋臼双柱骨折:23例病例分析。创伤肢体重建[j]; 2011;16(3):152-160。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信