A Retrospective Study on Experience of High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Critically Ill COVID-19 Adult Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit.

IF 1.5
Sukhyanti Kerai, Rahil Singh, Kirti N Saxena, Suraj D Desai, Anju R Bhalotra
{"title":"A Retrospective Study on Experience of High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Critically Ill COVID-19 Adult Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Sukhyanti Kerai,&nbsp;Rahil Singh,&nbsp;Kirti N Saxena,&nbsp;Suraj D Desai,&nbsp;Anju R Bhalotra","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients is debated due to its uncertain benefits and risks of aerosol dispersion. This retrospective study was aimed to assess the outcome of treatment with HFNC therapy in adult COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) admitted in intensive care units (ICU) and to assess the factors affecting outcome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrieved electronic medical records of all COVID-19 patients who received HFNC for respiratory support after failure to maintain adequate oxygenation with conventional oxygen devices, between June 1 and August 31, 2020. The data retrieved were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total number of 558 COVID-19 patients were admitted to ICUs, out of which 139 patients were identified to be on HFNC and 85 met the inclusion criteria for the study. The success rate of 48.2% with HFNC was observed in these patients. The patients recorded to experience HFNC success were of young age and having higher baseline oxygen saturation compared to those who had its failure. The ROX indices post-initiation were observed to be significantly higher in the success group (<i>p</i> ≤0.001). Awake-prone positioning while receiving HFNC was followed by around more patients in the success group (<i>p</i> <0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline oxygen saturation, awake-prone positioning, and number of days on HFNC were found to be independently affected outcome with HFNC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost half of the cases of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia can be managed successfully with HFNC, without the need of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kerai S, Singh R, Saxena KN, Desai SD, Bhalotra AR. A Retrospective Study on Experience of High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Critically Ill COVID-19 Adult Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(1):62-66.</p>","PeriodicalId":520643,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"62-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/ba/ijccm-26-62.PMC8783255.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients is debated due to its uncertain benefits and risks of aerosol dispersion. This retrospective study was aimed to assess the outcome of treatment with HFNC therapy in adult COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) admitted in intensive care units (ICU) and to assess the factors affecting outcome.

Material and methods: We retrieved electronic medical records of all COVID-19 patients who received HFNC for respiratory support after failure to maintain adequate oxygenation with conventional oxygen devices, between June 1 and August 31, 2020. The data retrieved were statistically analyzed.

Results: A total number of 558 COVID-19 patients were admitted to ICUs, out of which 139 patients were identified to be on HFNC and 85 met the inclusion criteria for the study. The success rate of 48.2% with HFNC was observed in these patients. The patients recorded to experience HFNC success were of young age and having higher baseline oxygen saturation compared to those who had its failure. The ROX indices post-initiation were observed to be significantly higher in the success group (p ≤0.001). Awake-prone positioning while receiving HFNC was followed by around more patients in the success group (p <0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline oxygen saturation, awake-prone positioning, and number of days on HFNC were found to be independently affected outcome with HFNC.

Conclusion: Almost half of the cases of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia can be managed successfully with HFNC, without the need of mechanical ventilation.

How to cite this article: Kerai S, Singh R, Saxena KN, Desai SD, Bhalotra AR. A Retrospective Study on Experience of High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Critically Ill COVID-19 Adult Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(1):62-66.

Abstract Image

重症监护病房重症COVID-19成人患者高流量鼻插管吸氧经验的回顾性研究
背景:高流量鼻插管(HFNC)在冠状病毒病-2019 (COVID-19)患者中的应用存在争议,因为其益处和气溶胶分散的风险不确定。本回顾性研究旨在评估HFNC治疗重症监护病房(ICU)收治的成人COVID-19急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)患者的疗效,并评估影响疗效的因素。材料和方法:我们检索了2020年6月1日至8月31日期间所有接受HFNC治疗的COVID-19患者的电子病历,这些患者在使用常规氧气装置维持足够氧合失败后接受了呼吸支持。对检索到的数据进行统计学分析。结果:共有558例COVID-19患者入住icu,其中139例确诊为HFNC, 85例符合本研究的纳入标准。HFNC的成功率为48.2%。记录到HFNC成功的患者是年轻的,与失败的患者相比,他们的基线血氧饱和度更高。治疗成功组起始后ROX指数明显升高(p≤0.001)。结论:近一半的中重度COVID-19肺炎患者可以在不需要机械通气的情况下,使用HFNC成功治疗。Kerai S, Singh R, Saxena KN, Desai SD, Bhalotra AR.重症监护病房重症COVID-19成人患者高流量鼻插管吸氧的回顾性研究。中华检验医学杂志;2009;26(1):62-66。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书