Francesco Condello, Matteo Sturla, Bernhard Reimers, Gaetano Liccardo, Giulio G Stefanini, Gianluigi Condorelli, Giuseppe Ferrante
{"title":"Association Between Colchicine Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Francesco Condello, Matteo Sturla, Bernhard Reimers, Gaetano Liccardo, Giulio G Stefanini, Gianluigi Condorelli, Giuseppe Ferrante","doi":"10.15420/ecr.2021.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The authors examined the association between colchicine treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. <b>Methods:</b> They performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with coronary artery disease receiving addon colchicine to standard treatment compared with standard treatment. They used a mixed-effects Poisson regression model with random intervention effects to estimate the pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CI. <b>Results:</b> Ten RCTs were identified, including 12,819 participants followed up for a median of 6 months. Colchicine was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (IRR 0.69; 95% CI [0.60-0.79]; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTB] = 28); MI (IRR 0.77; 95% CI [0.64-0.93]; NNTB = 95) and ischaemic stroke (IRR 0.48; 95% CI [0.30-0.76]; NNTB = 155) and with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events (IRR 1.69; 95% CI [1.12-2.54]; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome [NNTH] = 10). Colchicine did not affect all-cause death (IRR 1.09; 95% CI [0.85-1.40]), or cardiovascular death (IRR 0.75; 95% CI [0.51-1.12]), while it was associated with a higher risk of non-cardiovascular death (IRR 1.45; 95% CI [1.04-2.02]; NNTH = 396). <b>Conclusion:</b> The meta-analysis showed that the relative and absolute beneficial treatment effects of colchicine on cardiovascular outcomes outweigh the potential harm for non-cardiovascular mortality. <b>Registration:</b> PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021248874.</p>","PeriodicalId":93994,"journal":{"name":"European cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/a0/ecr-16-e39.PMC8576482.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2021.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background: The authors examined the association between colchicine treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: They performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with coronary artery disease receiving addon colchicine to standard treatment compared with standard treatment. They used a mixed-effects Poisson regression model with random intervention effects to estimate the pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CI. Results: Ten RCTs were identified, including 12,819 participants followed up for a median of 6 months. Colchicine was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (IRR 0.69; 95% CI [0.60-0.79]; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTB] = 28); MI (IRR 0.77; 95% CI [0.64-0.93]; NNTB = 95) and ischaemic stroke (IRR 0.48; 95% CI [0.30-0.76]; NNTB = 155) and with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events (IRR 1.69; 95% CI [1.12-2.54]; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome [NNTH] = 10). Colchicine did not affect all-cause death (IRR 1.09; 95% CI [0.85-1.40]), or cardiovascular death (IRR 0.75; 95% CI [0.51-1.12]), while it was associated with a higher risk of non-cardiovascular death (IRR 1.45; 95% CI [1.04-2.02]; NNTH = 396). Conclusion: The meta-analysis showed that the relative and absolute beneficial treatment effects of colchicine on cardiovascular outcomes outweigh the potential harm for non-cardiovascular mortality. Registration: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021248874.