Decrease in Serum Anti-MAG Autoantibodies Is Associated With Therapy Response in Patients With Anti-MAG Neuropathy: Retrospective Study.

IF 7.5
Pascal Hänggi, Butrint Aliu, Kea Martin, Ruben Herrendorff, Andreas Johann Steck
{"title":"Decrease in Serum Anti-MAG Autoantibodies Is Associated With Therapy Response in Patients With Anti-MAG Neuropathy: Retrospective Study.","authors":"Pascal Hänggi,&nbsp;Butrint Aliu,&nbsp;Kea Martin,&nbsp;Ruben Herrendorff,&nbsp;Andreas Johann Steck","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The objective of the retrospective analysis was to test the hypothesis that changes in serum anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) autoantibodies are associated with clinical response to immunotherapy in patients with anti-MAG neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As of January 29, 2020, we used anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein-related search strings in the Medline database to identify studies that provided information on anti-MAG immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies and clinical outcomes during immunotherapies. The relative change in anti-MAG IgM titers, paraprotein levels, or total IgM was determined before, during, or posttreatment, and the patients were assigned to \"responder,\" \"nonresponder,\"' or \"acute deteriorating\" category depending on their clinical response to treatment. The studies were qualified as \"supportive\" or \"not supportive\" depending on the percentage of patients exhibiting an association between relative change of anti-MAG antibody titers or levels and change in clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty studies with 410 patients with anti-MAG neuropathy were included in the analysis. Forty studies with 303 patients supported the hypothesis that a \"responder\" patient had a relative reduction of anti-MAG antibody titers or levels that is associated with clinical improvements and \"nonresponder\" patients exhibited no significant change in anti-MAG IgM antibodies. Six studies with 93 patients partly supported, and 4 studies with 26 patients did not support the hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The retrospective analysis confirmed the hypothesis that a relative reduction in serum anti-MAG IgM antibodies is associated with a clinical response to immunotherapies; a sustained reduction of at least 50% compared with pretreatment titers or levels could be a valuable indicator for therapeutic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":520720,"journal":{"name":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/26/NEURIMMINFL2020027250.PMC8587733.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background and objectives: The objective of the retrospective analysis was to test the hypothesis that changes in serum anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) autoantibodies are associated with clinical response to immunotherapy in patients with anti-MAG neuropathy.

Methods: As of January 29, 2020, we used anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein-related search strings in the Medline database to identify studies that provided information on anti-MAG immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies and clinical outcomes during immunotherapies. The relative change in anti-MAG IgM titers, paraprotein levels, or total IgM was determined before, during, or posttreatment, and the patients were assigned to "responder," "nonresponder,"' or "acute deteriorating" category depending on their clinical response to treatment. The studies were qualified as "supportive" or "not supportive" depending on the percentage of patients exhibiting an association between relative change of anti-MAG antibody titers or levels and change in clinical outcomes.

Results: Fifty studies with 410 patients with anti-MAG neuropathy were included in the analysis. Forty studies with 303 patients supported the hypothesis that a "responder" patient had a relative reduction of anti-MAG antibody titers or levels that is associated with clinical improvements and "nonresponder" patients exhibited no significant change in anti-MAG IgM antibodies. Six studies with 93 patients partly supported, and 4 studies with 26 patients did not support the hypothesis.

Discussion: The retrospective analysis confirmed the hypothesis that a relative reduction in serum anti-MAG IgM antibodies is associated with a clinical response to immunotherapies; a sustained reduction of at least 50% compared with pretreatment titers or levels could be a valuable indicator for therapeutic response.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗mag神经病变患者血清抗mag自身抗体降低与治疗反应相关:回顾性研究
背景和目的:回顾性分析的目的是验证血清抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白(MAG)自身抗体的变化与抗MAG神经病变患者对免疫治疗的临床反应相关的假设。方法:截至2020年1月29日,我们使用Medline数据库中的抗髓磷脂相关糖蛋白相关搜索字符串来识别提供抗mag免疫球蛋白M (IgM)自身抗体信息和免疫治疗期间临床结果的研究。在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后测定抗mag IgM滴度、副蛋白水平或总IgM的相对变化,并根据患者对治疗的临床反应将其划分为“有反应”、“无反应”或“急性恶化”类别。根据显示抗mag抗体滴度或水平的相对变化与临床结果变化之间存在关联的患者百分比,这些研究被定性为“支持”或“不支持”。结果:50项研究纳入了410例抗mag神经病变患者。涉及303名患者的40项研究支持这样的假设:“应答者”患者的抗mag抗体滴度或水平相对降低,这与临床改善有关,而“无应答者”患者的抗mag IgM抗体没有显著变化。6项涉及93名患者的研究部分支持该假设,4项涉及26名患者的研究不支持该假设。讨论:回顾性分析证实了血清抗mag IgM抗体的相对降低与免疫治疗的临床反应相关的假设;与预处理滴度或水平相比,持续降低至少50%可能是治疗反应的有价值指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信