The Effects of Hot Yoga on Kidney Function: An Observational Pilot and Feasibility Study.

Q3 Medicine
Risa Bordman, Christopher Meaney, Deanna Telner
{"title":"The Effects of Hot Yoga on Kidney Function: An Observational Pilot and Feasibility Study.","authors":"Risa Bordman,&nbsp;Christopher Meaney,&nbsp;Deanna Telner","doi":"10.17761/2022-D-21-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Yoga has been shown to have health benefits, whereas exercising in a hot environment has deleterious effects on kidney function. There are no long-term studies on the physiological effects of hot yoga. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in renal function acutely and over time between practitioners of hot and non-hot yoga. Urine and capillary samples were collected for urinalysis, albumin-creatinine ratio, and serum creatinine at yoga studios preand postexercise over 1 year. Thirty-two participants in non-hot yoga and 19 participants in hot yoga were recruited. Difference in blood capillary creatinine (post-yoga minus pre-yoga) showed a 7.52 μmol/L (SD 11.46) increase for practitioners of hot yoga and a 4.07 μmol/L (SD 9.94) increase for practitioners of non-hot yoga, with a between-group difference of 3.45 μmol/L (95% CI -0.42, 7.32; p = 0.08). Over 1 year, the mean difference in blood capillary creatinine for the hot group increased by 0.91 μmol/L (SD 11.00) and by 3.08 μmol/L (SD 9.96) for the non-hot group, with a between-group difference of -2.17 μmol/L (95% CI -10.20, 5.86; p = 0.58). Over 1 year, the mean difference in albumin-creatinine ratio for the hot group was -0.16 mg/mmol creatinine (SD = 0.74); for the non-hot group the difference was -0.20 mg/μmol (SD = 0.80). The difference in difference between the hot and non-hot groups was 0.04 mg/μmol (95% CI -0.60, 0.68; p = 0.90). Urine collected for urinalysis could not be analyzed due to too many 0 values. This pragmatic observational study did not find a statistically significant change in renal function between participants in non-hot and hot yoga either acutely or over 1 year. A larger and longer study focusing on blood creatinine over time would help to inform the long-term effects of hot yoga on the kidneys.</p>","PeriodicalId":38682,"journal":{"name":"International journal of yoga therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of yoga therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17761/2022-D-21-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yoga has been shown to have health benefits, whereas exercising in a hot environment has deleterious effects on kidney function. There are no long-term studies on the physiological effects of hot yoga. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in renal function acutely and over time between practitioners of hot and non-hot yoga. Urine and capillary samples were collected for urinalysis, albumin-creatinine ratio, and serum creatinine at yoga studios preand postexercise over 1 year. Thirty-two participants in non-hot yoga and 19 participants in hot yoga were recruited. Difference in blood capillary creatinine (post-yoga minus pre-yoga) showed a 7.52 μmol/L (SD 11.46) increase for practitioners of hot yoga and a 4.07 μmol/L (SD 9.94) increase for practitioners of non-hot yoga, with a between-group difference of 3.45 μmol/L (95% CI -0.42, 7.32; p = 0.08). Over 1 year, the mean difference in blood capillary creatinine for the hot group increased by 0.91 μmol/L (SD 11.00) and by 3.08 μmol/L (SD 9.96) for the non-hot group, with a between-group difference of -2.17 μmol/L (95% CI -10.20, 5.86; p = 0.58). Over 1 year, the mean difference in albumin-creatinine ratio for the hot group was -0.16 mg/mmol creatinine (SD = 0.74); for the non-hot group the difference was -0.20 mg/μmol (SD = 0.80). The difference in difference between the hot and non-hot groups was 0.04 mg/μmol (95% CI -0.60, 0.68; p = 0.90). Urine collected for urinalysis could not be analyzed due to too many 0 values. This pragmatic observational study did not find a statistically significant change in renal function between participants in non-hot and hot yoga either acutely or over 1 year. A larger and longer study focusing on blood creatinine over time would help to inform the long-term effects of hot yoga on the kidneys.

热瑜伽对肾功能的影响:一项观察性试点和可行性研究。
瑜伽已被证明对健康有益,而在炎热的环境中锻炼对肾功能有有害影响。目前还没有关于热瑜伽的生理作用的长期研究。本研究的目的是调查热瑜伽和非热瑜伽练习者之间急性和随时间的肾功能变化。收集1年以上瑜伽室运动前后的尿液和毛细血管样本进行尿液分析、白蛋白-肌酐比和血清肌酐。研究人员招募了32名非热瑜伽参与者和19名热瑜伽参与者。热瑜伽练习者的毛细血管肌酐(瑜伽后减去瑜伽前)增加了7.52 μmol/L (SD 11.46),非热瑜伽练习者的毛细血管肌酐增加了4.07 μmol/L (SD 9.94),组间差异为3.45 μmol/L (95% CI -0.42, 7.32;P = 0.08)。1年内,热组毛细血管肌酐的平均差异增加了0.91 μmol/L (SD 11.00),非热组增加了3.08 μmol/L (SD 9.96),组间差异为-2.17 μmol/L (95% CI -10.20, 5.86;P = 0.58)。1年内,热组白蛋白-肌酐比值的平均差异为-0.16 mg/mmol肌酐(SD = 0.74);非热组差异为-0.20 mg/μmol (SD = 0.80)。热组与非热组的差异为0.04 mg/μmol (95% CI -0.60, 0.68;P = 0.90)。收集尿液进行尿液分析,由于0值太多,无法进行分析。这项实用的观察性研究没有发现非热瑜伽和热瑜伽参与者在急性期或超过1年的时间里肾功能有统计学上的显著变化。一项更大规模、更长期的研究,重点关注血液肌酐随时间的变化,将有助于了解热瑜伽对肾脏的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of yoga therapy
International journal of yoga therapy Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信