Modified female mid-urethral sling for the treatment of incontinence after prostate treatment: One-center experience.

The Prostate Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-31 DOI:10.1002/pros.24306
Qiqi Mao, Yiwei Lin, Dan Xia, Shuo Wang, Hai Jiang
{"title":"Modified female mid-urethral sling for the treatment of incontinence after prostate treatment: One-center experience.","authors":"Qiqi Mao,&nbsp;Yiwei Lin,&nbsp;Dan Xia,&nbsp;Shuo Wang,&nbsp;Hai Jiang","doi":"10.1002/pros.24306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The male sling has emerged as a minimally invasive option for incontinence after prostate treatment (IPT) in recent years, but it has not yet been introduced into China. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of the modified female mid-urethral sling in the treatment of IPT and explored potential preoperative factors to better predict surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2014 to January 2021, a total of 70 patients with IPT who underwent transobturator male sling procedure using the modified female mid-urethral sling were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Functional outcomes were evaluated by daily pad usage, and the severity of incontinence was classified as mild (≤2 pads), moderate (3-4 pads), or severe (≥5 pads). Success was defined as no pad usage or 1 pad for safety (cure), or a reduction in daily pad use by >50% (improved). Patients were followed up at 3, 6 months, and yearly thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a final follow-up of 6-80 months, 35 (50.0%) patients were cured, 12 (17.1%) were improved, and 23 (32.9%) were still incontinent. There was a slight trend of declining continence over time, and the majority of patients remained improved. During follow-up, 25 patients had perineal or scrotal pain, five patients had voiding difficulty and two had de novo urgency, one developed infection and underwent sling explantation. Early urinary retention was the only significant factor linked to better surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified female mid-urethral sling represents a viable option for the treatment of IPT. Improved efficacy is seen in patients with a history of early postoperative urinary retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"598-604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The male sling has emerged as a minimally invasive option for incontinence after prostate treatment (IPT) in recent years, but it has not yet been introduced into China. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of the modified female mid-urethral sling in the treatment of IPT and explored potential preoperative factors to better predict surgical outcomes.

Methods: From May 2014 to January 2021, a total of 70 patients with IPT who underwent transobturator male sling procedure using the modified female mid-urethral sling were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Functional outcomes were evaluated by daily pad usage, and the severity of incontinence was classified as mild (≤2 pads), moderate (3-4 pads), or severe (≥5 pads). Success was defined as no pad usage or 1 pad for safety (cure), or a reduction in daily pad use by >50% (improved). Patients were followed up at 3, 6 months, and yearly thereafter.

Results: At a final follow-up of 6-80 months, 35 (50.0%) patients were cured, 12 (17.1%) were improved, and 23 (32.9%) were still incontinent. There was a slight trend of declining continence over time, and the majority of patients remained improved. During follow-up, 25 patients had perineal or scrotal pain, five patients had voiding difficulty and two had de novo urgency, one developed infection and underwent sling explantation. Early urinary retention was the only significant factor linked to better surgical outcomes.

Conclusion: The modified female mid-urethral sling represents a viable option for the treatment of IPT. Improved efficacy is seen in patients with a history of early postoperative urinary retention.

改良女性中尿道吊带治疗前列腺治疗后尿失禁:单中心经验。
背景:近年来,男性吊带术已成为治疗前列腺治疗后尿失禁的一种微创选择,但尚未引入中国。本研究回顾性评价改良女性尿道中吊带治疗IPT的临床效果,并探讨可能的术前因素,以更好地预测手术结果。方法:回顾性分析2014年5月至2021年1月共70例IPT患者使用改良的女性尿道中吊带行经闭口男性吊带术。所有手术均由一名外科医生完成。通过每日使用尿垫来评估功能结果,并将尿失禁的严重程度分为轻度(≤2个)、中度(3-4个)和重度(≥5个)。成功的定义是无垫使用或1块垫安全(治愈),或每日垫使用减少>50%(改善)。随访时间分别为3个月、6个月和每年一次。结果:最终随访6 ~ 80个月,治愈35例(50.0%),好转12例(17.1%),仍失禁23例(32.9%)。随着时间的推移,尿失禁有轻微的下降趋势,大多数患者仍然得到改善。随访期间,25例患者出现会阴或阴囊疼痛,5例患者出现排尿困难,2例患者出现新发急症,1例患者出现感染并行吊带外植术。早期尿潴留是唯一与更好的手术结果相关的重要因素。结论:改良的女性中尿道吊带是治疗IPT的可行选择。术后早期有尿潴留史的患者疗效明显提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书