Genomic evidence suggests further changes of butterfly names.

The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-06
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin
{"title":"Genomic evidence suggests further changes of butterfly names.","authors":"Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Cong,&nbsp;Jinhui Shen,&nbsp;Paul A Opler,&nbsp;Nick V Grishin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Further genomic sequencing of butterflies by our research group expanding the coverage of species and specimens from different localities, coupled with genome-scale phylogenetic analysis and complemented by phenotypic considerations, suggests a number of changes to the names of butterflies, mostly those recorded from the United States and Canada. Here, we present evidence to support these changes. The changes are intended to make butterfly classification more internally consistent at the genus, subgenus and species levels. I.e., considering all available evidence, we attempt to assign similar taxonomic ranks to the clades of comparable genetic differentiation, which on average is correlated with the age of phylogenetic groups estimated from trees. For species, we use criteria devised by genomic analysis of the genetic differentiation across suture zones and comparison of sympatric populations of closely related species. As a result, we resurrect 4 genera and 1 subgenus from subgeneric status or synonymy, change the rank of 8 currently used genera to subgenus, synonymize 7 genus-group names, summarize evidence to support 19 taxa as species instead of subspecies and 1 taxon as subspecies instead of species, along with a number of additional changes. One new genus and one new subspecies are described. Namely, the following taxa are treated as genera <i>Tharsalea</i> Scudder, 1876, <i>Helleia</i> Verity, 1943, <i>Apangea</i> Zhdanko, 1995, and <i>Boldenaria</i> Zhdanko, 1995. <i>Tetracharis</i> Grote, 1898 is a valid subgenus (not a synonym of <i>Anthocharis</i> Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833]) that consists of <i>Anthocharis cethura</i> C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865 (Müller, 1764), <i>Anthocharis midea</i> (Hübner, [1809]), and <i>Anthocharis limonea</i> (A. Butler, 1871). The following are subgenera: <i>Speyeria</i> Scudder, 1872 of <i>Argynnis</i> Fabricius, 1807; <i>Aglais</i> Dalman, 1816 and <i>Polygonia</i> Hübner, [1819] of <i>Nymphalis</i> Kluk, 1780; <i>Palaeonympha</i> Butler, 1871 of <i>Megisto</i> Hübner, [1819]; <i>Hyponephele</i> Muschamp, 1915 of <i>Cercyonis</i> Scudder, 1875; <i>Pyronia</i> Hübner, [1819] and <i>Aphantopus</i> Wallengren, 1853 of <i>Maniola</i> Schrank, 1801 and <i>Pseudonymphidia</i> Callaghan, 1985 of <i>Pachythone. Lafron</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Papilio orus</i> Stoll, [1780], parent subfamily <i>Lycaeninae</i> [Leach], [1815]) is described. <i>Dipsas japonica</i> Murray, 1875 is fixed as the type species of <i>Neozephyrus</i> Sibatani & Ito, 1942. The following taxa are junior subjective synonyms: <i>Falcapica</i> Klots, 1930 of <i>Tetracharis</i> Grote, 1898; <i>Habrodais</i> Scudder, 1876, <i>Favonius</i> Sibatani & Ito, 1942, <i>Neozephyrus</i> Sibatani & Ito, 1942, <i>Quercusia</i> Verity, 1943, <i>Chrysozephyrus</i> Shirôzu & Yamamoto, 1956, and <i>Sibataniozephyrus</i> Inomata, 1986 of <i>Hypaurotis</i> Scudder, 1876; <i>Plesioarida</i> Trujano & García, 2018 of <i>Roeberella</i> Strand, 1932; <i>Papilio temenes</i> Godart, 1819 (lectotype designated herein) of <i>Heraclides aristodemus</i> (Esper, 1794), <i>Speyeria hydaspe conquista</i> dos Passos & Grey, 1945 of <i>Argynnis hesperis tetonia</i> (dos Passos & Grey, 1945), and <i>Erycides imbreus</i> Plötz, 1879 of <i>Phocides polybius polybius</i> (Fabricius, 1793). The following are revised genus-species combinations: <i>Pachythone lencates</i> (Hewitson, 1875) <i>Pachythone flocculus</i> (Brévignon & Gallard, 1993), <i>Pachythone floccus</i> (Brévignon, 2013), <i>Pachythone heberti</i> (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007), <i>Pachythone marajoara</i> (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007) and <i>Cissia cleophes</i> (Godman & Salvin, 1889). The following species are transferred between subgenera: <i>Anthocharis lanceolata</i> Lucas, 1852 belongs to <i>Anthocharis</i> Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833] instead of <i>Paramidea</i> Kuznetsov, 1929 and <i>Danaus eresimus</i> (Cramer, 1777) belongs to <i>Danaus</i> Kluk, 1780, and not to <i>Anosia</i> Hübner, 1816. The following taxa are distinct species rather than subspecies (of species shown in parenthesis): <i>Heraclides ponceana</i> (Schaus, 1911) (not <i>Heraclides aristodemus</i> (Esper, 1794)), <i>Colias elis</i> Strecker, 1885 (not <i>Colias meadii</i> W. H. Edwards, 1871), <i>Argynnis irene</i> Boisduval, 1869 and <i>Argynnis nausicaa</i> W. H. Edwards, 1874 (not <i>Argynnis hesperis</i> W. H. Edwards, 1864), <i>Coenonympha california</i> Westwood, [1851] (not <i>Coenonympha tullia</i> (Müller, 1764)), <i>Dione incarnata</i> N. Riley, 1926 (not <i>Dione vanillae</i> (Linnaeus, 1758)), <i>Chlosyne coronado</i> (M. Smith & Brock, 1988) (not <i>Chlosyne fulvia</i> (W. H. Edwards, 1879)), <i>Chlosyne chinatiensis</i> (Tinkham, 1944) (not <i>Chlosyne theona</i> (Ménétriés, 1855)), <i>Phocides lilea</i> (Reakirt, [1867]) (not <i>Phocides polybius</i> (Fabricius, 1793)), <i>Cecropterus nevada</i> (Scudder, 1872) and <i>Cecropterus dobra</i> (Evans, 1952) (not <i>Cecropterus mexicana</i> (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869)), <i>Telegonus anausis</i> Godman & Salvin, 1896, (not <i>Telegonus anaphus</i> (Cramer, 1777)), <i>Epargyreus huachuca</i> Dixon, 1955 (not <i>Epargyreus clarus</i> (Cramer, 1775)), <i>Nisoniades bromias</i> (Godman & Salvin, 1894) (not <i>Nisoniades rubescens</i> (Möschler, 1877)), <i>Pholisora crestar</i> J. Scott & Davenport, 2017 (not <i>Pholisora catullus</i> (Fabricius, 1793)), <i>Carterocephalus mandan</i> (W. H. Edwards, 1863) and <i>Carterocephalus skada</i> (W. H. Edwards, 1870) (not <i>Carterocephalus palaemon</i> (Pallas, 1771)), <i>Amblyscirtes arizonae</i> H. Freeman, 1993 (not <i>Amblyscirtes elissa</i> Godman, 1900), and <i>Megathymus violae</i> D. Stallings & Turner, 1956 (not <i>Megathymus ursus</i> Poling, 1902). Resulting from these changes, the following are revised species-subspecies combinations: <i>Heraclides ponceana bjorndalae</i> (Clench, 1979), <i>Heraclides ponceana majasi</i> L. Miller, 1987, <i>Argynnis irene dodgei</i> Gunder, 1931, <i>Argynnis irene cottlei</i> J. A. Comstock, 1925, <i>Argynnis irene hanseni</i> (J. Emmel, T. Emmel & Mattoon, 1998), <i>Argynnis nausicaa elko</i> (Austin, 1984), <i>Argynnis nausicaa greyi</i> (Moeck, 1950), <i>Argynnis nausicaa viola</i> (dos Passos & Grey, 1945), <i>Argynnis nausicaa tetonia</i> (dos Passos & Grey, 1945), <i>Argynnis nausicaa chitone</i> W. H. Edwards, 1879, <i>Argynnis nausicaa schellbachi</i> (Garth, 1949), <i>Argynnis nausicaa electa</i> W. H. Edwards, 1878, <i>Argynnis nausicaa dorothea</i> (Moeck, 1947), and <i>Argynnis nausicaa capitanensis</i> (R. Holland, 1988), <i>Argynnis zerene atossa</i> W. H. Edwards, 1890, <i>Dione incarnata nigrior</i> (Michener, 1942), <i>Chlosyne coronado pariaensis</i> (M. Smith & Brock, 1988), <i>Cecropterus nevada aemilea</i> (Skinner, 1893), <i>Cecropterus nevada blanca</i> (J. Scott, 1981), <i>Telegonus anausis annetta</i> (Evans, 1952), <i>Telegonus anausis anoma</i> (Evans, 1952), <i>Telegonus anausis aniza</i> (Evans, 1952), <i>Epargyreus huachuca profugus</i> Austin, 1998, <i>Carterocephalus mandan mesapano</i> (Scudder, 1868) and <i>Carterocephalus skada magnus</i> Mattoon & Tilden, 1998. American <i>Coenonympha</i> subspecies placed under <i>C. tullia</i> other than <i>Coenonympha tullia kodiak</i> W. H. Edwards, 1869, <i>Coenonympha tullia mixturata</i> Alpheraky, 1897 and <i>Coenonympha tullia yukonensis</i> W. Holland, 1900 belong to <i>C. california. Heraclides ponceana latefasciatus</i> Grishin, <b>ssp. n.</b> is described from Cuba. <i>Argynnis coronis carolae</i> dos Passos & Grey, 1942 is considered a subspecies-level taxon. Unless stated otherwise, all subgenera, species, subspecies and synonyms of mentioned genera and species are transferred together with their parent taxa, and others remain as previously classified.</p>","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":"8 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794283/pdf/nihms-1724227.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Further genomic sequencing of butterflies by our research group expanding the coverage of species and specimens from different localities, coupled with genome-scale phylogenetic analysis and complemented by phenotypic considerations, suggests a number of changes to the names of butterflies, mostly those recorded from the United States and Canada. Here, we present evidence to support these changes. The changes are intended to make butterfly classification more internally consistent at the genus, subgenus and species levels. I.e., considering all available evidence, we attempt to assign similar taxonomic ranks to the clades of comparable genetic differentiation, which on average is correlated with the age of phylogenetic groups estimated from trees. For species, we use criteria devised by genomic analysis of the genetic differentiation across suture zones and comparison of sympatric populations of closely related species. As a result, we resurrect 4 genera and 1 subgenus from subgeneric status or synonymy, change the rank of 8 currently used genera to subgenus, synonymize 7 genus-group names, summarize evidence to support 19 taxa as species instead of subspecies and 1 taxon as subspecies instead of species, along with a number of additional changes. One new genus and one new subspecies are described. Namely, the following taxa are treated as genera Tharsalea Scudder, 1876, Helleia Verity, 1943, Apangea Zhdanko, 1995, and Boldenaria Zhdanko, 1995. Tetracharis Grote, 1898 is a valid subgenus (not a synonym of Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833]) that consists of Anthocharis cethura C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865 (Müller, 1764), Anthocharis midea (Hübner, [1809]), and Anthocharis limonea (A. Butler, 1871). The following are subgenera: Speyeria Scudder, 1872 of Argynnis Fabricius, 1807; Aglais Dalman, 1816 and Polygonia Hübner, [1819] of Nymphalis Kluk, 1780; Palaeonympha Butler, 1871 of Megisto Hübner, [1819]; Hyponephele Muschamp, 1915 of Cercyonis Scudder, 1875; Pyronia Hübner, [1819] and Aphantopus Wallengren, 1853 of Maniola Schrank, 1801 and Pseudonymphidia Callaghan, 1985 of Pachythone. Lafron Grishin, gen. n. (type species Papilio orus Stoll, [1780], parent subfamily Lycaeninae [Leach], [1815]) is described. Dipsas japonica Murray, 1875 is fixed as the type species of Neozephyrus Sibatani & Ito, 1942. The following taxa are junior subjective synonyms: Falcapica Klots, 1930 of Tetracharis Grote, 1898; Habrodais Scudder, 1876, Favonius Sibatani & Ito, 1942, Neozephyrus Sibatani & Ito, 1942, Quercusia Verity, 1943, Chrysozephyrus Shirôzu & Yamamoto, 1956, and Sibataniozephyrus Inomata, 1986 of Hypaurotis Scudder, 1876; Plesioarida Trujano & García, 2018 of Roeberella Strand, 1932; Papilio temenes Godart, 1819 (lectotype designated herein) of Heraclides aristodemus (Esper, 1794), Speyeria hydaspe conquista dos Passos & Grey, 1945 of Argynnis hesperis tetonia (dos Passos & Grey, 1945), and Erycides imbreus Plötz, 1879 of Phocides polybius polybius (Fabricius, 1793). The following are revised genus-species combinations: Pachythone lencates (Hewitson, 1875) Pachythone flocculus (Brévignon & Gallard, 1993), Pachythone floccus (Brévignon, 2013), Pachythone heberti (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007), Pachythone marajoara (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007) and Cissia cleophes (Godman & Salvin, 1889). The following species are transferred between subgenera: Anthocharis lanceolata Lucas, 1852 belongs to Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833] instead of Paramidea Kuznetsov, 1929 and Danaus eresimus (Cramer, 1777) belongs to Danaus Kluk, 1780, and not to Anosia Hübner, 1816. The following taxa are distinct species rather than subspecies (of species shown in parenthesis): Heraclides ponceana (Schaus, 1911) (not Heraclides aristodemus (Esper, 1794)), Colias elis Strecker, 1885 (not Colias meadii W. H. Edwards, 1871), Argynnis irene Boisduval, 1869 and Argynnis nausicaa W. H. Edwards, 1874 (not Argynnis hesperis W. H. Edwards, 1864), Coenonympha california Westwood, [1851] (not Coenonympha tullia (Müller, 1764)), Dione incarnata N. Riley, 1926 (not Dione vanillae (Linnaeus, 1758)), Chlosyne coronado (M. Smith & Brock, 1988) (not Chlosyne fulvia (W. H. Edwards, 1879)), Chlosyne chinatiensis (Tinkham, 1944) (not Chlosyne theona (Ménétriés, 1855)), Phocides lilea (Reakirt, [1867]) (not Phocides polybius (Fabricius, 1793)), Cecropterus nevada (Scudder, 1872) and Cecropterus dobra (Evans, 1952) (not Cecropterus mexicana (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869)), Telegonus anausis Godman & Salvin, 1896, (not Telegonus anaphus (Cramer, 1777)), Epargyreus huachuca Dixon, 1955 (not Epargyreus clarus (Cramer, 1775)), Nisoniades bromias (Godman & Salvin, 1894) (not Nisoniades rubescens (Möschler, 1877)), Pholisora crestar J. Scott & Davenport, 2017 (not Pholisora catullus (Fabricius, 1793)), Carterocephalus mandan (W. H. Edwards, 1863) and Carterocephalus skada (W. H. Edwards, 1870) (not Carterocephalus palaemon (Pallas, 1771)), Amblyscirtes arizonae H. Freeman, 1993 (not Amblyscirtes elissa Godman, 1900), and Megathymus violae D. Stallings & Turner, 1956 (not Megathymus ursus Poling, 1902). Resulting from these changes, the following are revised species-subspecies combinations: Heraclides ponceana bjorndalae (Clench, 1979), Heraclides ponceana majasi L. Miller, 1987, Argynnis irene dodgei Gunder, 1931, Argynnis irene cottlei J. A. Comstock, 1925, Argynnis irene hanseni (J. Emmel, T. Emmel & Mattoon, 1998), Argynnis nausicaa elko (Austin, 1984), Argynnis nausicaa greyi (Moeck, 1950), Argynnis nausicaa viola (dos Passos & Grey, 1945), Argynnis nausicaa tetonia (dos Passos & Grey, 1945), Argynnis nausicaa chitone W. H. Edwards, 1879, Argynnis nausicaa schellbachi (Garth, 1949), Argynnis nausicaa electa W. H. Edwards, 1878, Argynnis nausicaa dorothea (Moeck, 1947), and Argynnis nausicaa capitanensis (R. Holland, 1988), Argynnis zerene atossa W. H. Edwards, 1890, Dione incarnata nigrior (Michener, 1942), Chlosyne coronado pariaensis (M. Smith & Brock, 1988), Cecropterus nevada aemilea (Skinner, 1893), Cecropterus nevada blanca (J. Scott, 1981), Telegonus anausis annetta (Evans, 1952), Telegonus anausis anoma (Evans, 1952), Telegonus anausis aniza (Evans, 1952), Epargyreus huachuca profugus Austin, 1998, Carterocephalus mandan mesapano (Scudder, 1868) and Carterocephalus skada magnus Mattoon & Tilden, 1998. American Coenonympha subspecies placed under C. tullia other than Coenonympha tullia kodiak W. H. Edwards, 1869, Coenonympha tullia mixturata Alpheraky, 1897 and Coenonympha tullia yukonensis W. Holland, 1900 belong to C. california. Heraclides ponceana latefasciatus Grishin, ssp. n. is described from Cuba. Argynnis coronis carolae dos Passos & Grey, 1942 is considered a subspecies-level taxon. Unless stated otherwise, all subgenera, species, subspecies and synonyms of mentioned genera and species are transferred together with their parent taxa, and others remain as previously classified.

基因组证据表明蝴蝶的名字有进一步的变化。
我们的研究小组进一步对蝴蝶进行了基因组测序,扩大了来自不同地区的物种和标本的覆盖范围,加上基因组尺度的系统发育分析和表型考虑,表明蝴蝶的名称发生了一些变化,主要是来自美国和加拿大的记录。在这里,我们提供证据来支持这些变化。这些变化是为了使蝴蝶的分类在属、亚属和种的水平上更加内部一致。也就是说,考虑到所有可用的证据,我们试图将相似的分类等级分配给具有可比遗传分化的进化枝,这平均与从树木中估计的系统发生群的年龄相关。对于物种,我们使用的标准是通过对缝合带遗传分化的基因组分析和对近亲物种的同域种群的比较设计的。因此,我们将4个属和1个亚属从亚属状态或同义状态中复活,将8个目前使用的属级改为亚属,将7个属群名称同义化,总结了支持19个分类群为种而不是亚种,1个分类群为亚种而不是种的证据,以及一些其他变化。描述了一个新属和一个新亚种。即,以下分类群被视为Tharsalea Scudder属(1876),Helleia Verity属(1943),Apangea Zhdanko属(1995)和Boldenaria Zhdanko属(1995)。Tetracharis Grote, 1898是一个有效的亚属(不是Anthocharis Boisduval的同义词,Rambur, [dumnil] & Graslin,[1833]),由Anthocharis cethura C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865 (m<s:1> ller, 1764), Anthocharis midea (h<s:1> bner,[1809])和Anthocharis limonea (a . Butler, 1871)组成。以下为亚属:银腹蛇属(Argynnis Fabricius), 1872;Aglais Dalman, 1816和Polygonia h<e:1> bner, [1819] of nyphalis Kluk, 1780;Megisto h<e:1> bner的Palaeonympha Butler, 1871, [1819];斯卡德尔,1875年;Pyronia h<e:1> bner,[1819]和Aphantopus Wallengren, 1853 of Maniola Schrank, 1801 and Pseudonymphidia Callaghan, 1985 of Pachythone。描述了Lafron Grishin, gen. n.(模式种Papilio orus Stoll,[1780],亲本Lycaeninae亚科[Leach],[1815])。Dipsas japonica Murray, 1875年被确定为Neozephyrus Sibatani和Ito, 1942年的模式种。以下分类群为初级主观同义词:Falcapica Klots, 1930 of Tetracharis Grote, 1898;Habrodais Scudder, 1876年,Favonius Sibatani & Ito, 1942年,Neozephyrus Sibatani & Ito, 1942年,Quercusia Verity, 1943年,Chrysozephyrus Shirôzu & Yamamoto, 1956年,以及Hypaurotis Scudder, 1986年的Sibataniozephyrus Inomata;Plesioarida Trujano & García, 2018 of Roeberella Strand, 1932;Heraclides aristodemus (Esper, 1794)中的Papilio temenes Godart, 1819年(此处指定的选种),Argynnis hesperis tetonia (dos Passos & Grey, 1945)中的Speyeria hydaspe conquista dos Passos & Grey, 1945)和Phocides polybius polybius (Fabricius, 1793)中的Erycides imbreus Plötz, 1879年。以下是修订后的属种组合:Pachythone lencates (Hewitson, 1875) Pachythone小叶(br<s:1> vignon & Gallard, 1993)、Pachythone flocus (br<s:1> vignon, 2013)、Pachythone heberti (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007)、Pachythone marajoara (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007)和Cissia cleophes (Godman & Salvin, 1889)。以下物种在亚属之间转移:Anthocharis lanceolata Lucas, 1852属于Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur, [dum<s:1>] & Graslin,[1833]而不是Paramidea Kuznetsov, 1929; Danaus eresimus (Cramer, 1777)属于Danaus Kluk, 1780,而不是ananosia h<e:1> bner, 1816。下列分类群是不同的种,而不是亚种(括号内所示的种的分类群):Heraclides ponceana (Schaus, 1911)(不是Heraclides aristodemus (Esper, 1794)), Colias elis Strecker, 1885(不是Colias meadii W. H. Edwards, 1871), Argynnis irene Boisduval, 1869和Argynnis nausicaa W. H. Edwards, 1874(不是Argynnis hesperis W. H. Edwards, 1864),加利福尼亚Westwood,[1851](不是conenonympha tullia (m<s:1> ller, 1764)), Dione incarnata N. Riley, 1926(不是Dione vanillae (Linnaeus, 1758)), coronado (M. Smith & Brock, 1988)(不是closyne fulvia (W. H. Edwards),1879)), Chlosyne chinatiensis (Tinkham, 1944)(不是Chlosyne theona (Menetries, 1855)), Phocides lilea (Reakirt[1867])(不是Phocides多样蟹属(腔上囊,1793)),Cecropterus内华达州(飞毛腿,1872)和Cecropterus多布拉(埃文斯,1952)(不是Cecropterus墨西哥(Herrich-Schaffer, 1869)),忒勒戈诺斯anausis戈德曼& Salvin, 1896,(不是忒勒戈诺斯anaphus(克莱默,1777)),Epargyreus瓦迪克森,1955年(不是Epargyreus来说(克莱默,1775)),Nisoniades bromias(耶稣基督& Salvin1894)(不是Nisoniades rubescens (Möschler, 1877)), Pholisora crestar J. Scott & Davenport, 2017(不是Pholisora catullus (fabicius, 1793)), Carterocephalus mandan (W. H. Edwards, 1863)和Carterocephalus skada (W. H。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信