Improving the Law for Animals: a Campaigning Lawyer's Perspective.

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s10991-022-09293-8
David Thomas
{"title":"Improving the Law for Animals: a Campaigning Lawyer's Perspective.","authors":"David Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s10991-022-09293-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The protection which the law gives animals is based on a fundamentally different philosophy to that it gives people. With people, causing significant physical harm is nearly always prohibited, irrespective of any benefit which might accrue to others. By contrast, animals' essential interests are weighed against a wide range of human interests, and usually they lose out. That routinely means that significant harm is inflicted on them, quite legally. Many consider that there is therefore a pressing need for lawyers committed to maximising the protection which animals receive. This article discusses the numerous ways in which lawyers can help animal protection organisations realise their goals, with two case studies. The first relates to the global trade in seal products and the second to the legal status of domesticated animals as chattels and the implications this has for their welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":42661,"journal":{"name":"Liverpool Law Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"107-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8781699/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liverpool Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09293-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The protection which the law gives animals is based on a fundamentally different philosophy to that it gives people. With people, causing significant physical harm is nearly always prohibited, irrespective of any benefit which might accrue to others. By contrast, animals' essential interests are weighed against a wide range of human interests, and usually they lose out. That routinely means that significant harm is inflicted on them, quite legally. Many consider that there is therefore a pressing need for lawyers committed to maximising the protection which animals receive. This article discusses the numerous ways in which lawyers can help animal protection organisations realise their goals, with two case studies. The first relates to the global trade in seal products and the second to the legal status of domesticated animals as chattels and the implications this has for their welfare.

完善动物保护法律:一名律师的观点。
法律给予动物的保护与给予人类的保护是基于一种根本不同的哲学。对人来说,造成重大的身体伤害几乎总是被禁止的,不管这会给他人带来什么好处。相比之下,动物的基本利益与人类的广泛利益相权衡,通常它们会输。这通常意味着他们受到了相当合法的重大伤害。因此,许多人认为迫切需要律师致力于最大限度地保护动物。本文通过两个案例讨论了律师帮助动物保护组织实现其目标的多种方式。第一个问题涉及海豹产品的全球贸易,第二个问题涉及家畜作为动产的法律地位及其对其福利的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Liverpool Law Review is a tri-annual journal of contemporary domestic, European and international legal and social policy issues. The Journal aims to provide articles, commentaries and reviews across a wide range of theoretical and practical legal and social policy matters - including public law, private law, civil and criminal justice, international law, ethics and legal theory. The Journal has many international subscribers and regularly publishes important contributions from the U.K. and abroad. Articles and commentaries are published with sufficient speed to ensure that they are truly current.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信