Emergency surgery admissions and the COVID-19 pandemic: did the first wave really change our practice? Results of an ACOI/WSES international retrospective cohort audit on 6263 patients.

Giovanni D Tebala, Marika S Milani, Mark Bignell, Giles Bond-Smith, Christopher Lewis, Roberto Cirocchi, Salomone Di Saverio, Fausto Catena, Marco Scatizzi, Pierluigi Marini
{"title":"Emergency surgery admissions and the COVID-19 pandemic: did the first wave really change our practice? Results of an ACOI/WSES international retrospective cohort audit on 6263 patients.","authors":"Giovanni D Tebala,&nbsp;Marika S Milani,&nbsp;Mark Bignell,&nbsp;Giles Bond-Smith,&nbsp;Christopher Lewis,&nbsp;Roberto Cirocchi,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Marco Scatizzi,&nbsp;Pierluigi Marini","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00407-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic is having a deep impact on emergency surgical services, with a significant reduction of patients admitted into emergency surgical units world widely. Reliable figures of this reduction have not been produced yet. Our international audit aimed at giving a precise snapshot of the absolute and relative changes of emergency surgical admissions at the outbreak of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Datasets of patients admitted as general surgical emergencies into 45 internationally distributed emergency surgical units during the months of March and April 2020 (Covid-19 pandemic outbreak) were collected and compared with those of patients admitted into the same units during the months of March and April 2019 (pre-Covid-19). Primary endpoint was to evaluate the relative variation of the presentation symptoms and discharge diagnoses between the two study periods. Secondary endpoint was to identify the possible change of therapeutic strategy during the same two periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five centres participated sent their anonymised data to the study hub, for a total of 6263 patients. Of these, 3810 were admitted in the pre-Covid period and 2453 in the Covid period, for a 35.6% absolute reduction. The most common presentation was abdominal pain, whose incidence did not change between the two periods, but in the Covid period patients presented less frequently with anal pain, hernias, anaemia and weight loss. ASA 1 and low frailty patients were admitted less frequently, while ASA>1 and frail patients showed a relative increase. The type of surgical access did not change significantly, but lap-to-open conversion rate halved between the two study periods. Discharge diagnoses of appendicitis and diverticulitis reduced significantly, while bowel ischaemia and perianal ailments had a significant relative increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our audit demonstrates a significant overall reduction of emergency surgery admissions at the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic with a minimal change of the proportions of single presentations, diagnoses and treatments. These findings may open the door to new ways of managing surgical emergencies without engulfing the already busy hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795350/pdf/","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00407-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is having a deep impact on emergency surgical services, with a significant reduction of patients admitted into emergency surgical units world widely. Reliable figures of this reduction have not been produced yet. Our international audit aimed at giving a precise snapshot of the absolute and relative changes of emergency surgical admissions at the outbreak of the pandemic.

Materials and methods: Datasets of patients admitted as general surgical emergencies into 45 internationally distributed emergency surgical units during the months of March and April 2020 (Covid-19 pandemic outbreak) were collected and compared with those of patients admitted into the same units during the months of March and April 2019 (pre-Covid-19). Primary endpoint was to evaluate the relative variation of the presentation symptoms and discharge diagnoses between the two study periods. Secondary endpoint was to identify the possible change of therapeutic strategy during the same two periods.

Results: Forty-five centres participated sent their anonymised data to the study hub, for a total of 6263 patients. Of these, 3810 were admitted in the pre-Covid period and 2453 in the Covid period, for a 35.6% absolute reduction. The most common presentation was abdominal pain, whose incidence did not change between the two periods, but in the Covid period patients presented less frequently with anal pain, hernias, anaemia and weight loss. ASA 1 and low frailty patients were admitted less frequently, while ASA>1 and frail patients showed a relative increase. The type of surgical access did not change significantly, but lap-to-open conversion rate halved between the two study periods. Discharge diagnoses of appendicitis and diverticulitis reduced significantly, while bowel ischaemia and perianal ailments had a significant relative increase.

Conclusions: Our audit demonstrates a significant overall reduction of emergency surgery admissions at the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic with a minimal change of the proportions of single presentations, diagnoses and treatments. These findings may open the door to new ways of managing surgical emergencies without engulfing the already busy hospitals.

Abstract Image

急诊手术入院和COVID-19大流行:第一波浪潮真的改变了我们的做法吗?ACOI/WSES国际回顾性队列审计6263例患者的结果
导语:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对急诊外科服务产生了深刻影响,世界各地急诊外科收治的患者大幅减少。目前还没有关于这一减少的可靠数字。我们的国际审计旨在准确了解疫情爆发时急诊手术入院人数的绝对和相对变化。材料与方法:收集2020年3月至4月(Covid-19大流行期间)45个国际分布的急诊外科单位作为普通外科急诊收治的患者数据集,并与2019年3月至4月(Covid-19前)同一单位收治的患者数据集进行比较。主要终点是评估两个研究期间的表现、症状和出院诊断的相对变化。次要终点是确定在相同的两个时间段内治疗策略的可能变化。结果:45个参与的中心向研究中心发送了他们的匿名数据,总共有6263名患者。其中,新冠肺炎前接收3810人,新冠肺炎期间接收2453人,绝对减少35.6%。最常见的表现是腹痛,其发病率在两个时期之间没有变化,但在新冠肺炎期间,患者出现肛门疼痛、疝气、贫血和体重减轻的频率较低。ASA 1级和低虚弱患者入院次数较少,而ASA>1级和虚弱患者入院次数相对增加。手术通路的类型没有明显改变,但在两个研究期间,lap-到open的转换率减少了一半。阑尾炎和憩室炎的出院诊断率显著降低,而肠缺血和肛周疾病的出院诊断率相对显著增加。结论:我们的审计表明,在2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发期间,急诊手术入院人数显著减少,而单一表现、诊断和治疗的比例变化很小。这些发现可能会打开一扇门,以新的方式管理外科紧急情况,而不会吞噬已经繁忙的医院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信