Fully Automated Artery-Specific Calcium Scoring Based on Machine Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening.

IF 1.7
Moritz T Winkelmann, Johann Jacoby, Chris Schwemmer, Sebastian Faby, Patrick Krumm, Christoph Artzner, Malte N Bongers
{"title":"Fully Automated Artery-Specific Calcium Scoring Based on Machine Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening.","authors":"Moritz T Winkelmann,&nbsp;Johann Jacoby,&nbsp;Chris Schwemmer,&nbsp;Sebastian Faby,&nbsp;Patrick Krumm,&nbsp;Christoph Artzner,&nbsp;Malte N Bongers","doi":"10.1055/a-1717-2703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluation of machine learning-based fully automated artery-specific coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring software, using semi-automated software as a reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 505 patients underwent non-contrast-enhanced calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT). Automated, machine learning-based software quantified the Agatston score (AS), volume score (VS), and mass score (MS) of each coronary artery [right coronary artery (RCA), left main (LM), circumflex (CX) and left anterior descending (LAD)]. Identified CAC of readers who annotated the data with semi-automated software served as a reference standard. Statistics included comparisons of evaluation time, agreement of identified CAC, and comparisons of the AS, VS, and MS of the reference standard and the fully automated algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The machine learning-based software correlated strongly with the reference standard for the AS, VS, and MS (Spearman's rho > 0.969) (p < 0.001), with excellent agreement (ICC > 0.919) (p < 0.001). The mean assessment time of the reference standard was 59 seconds (IQR 39-140) and that of the automated algorithm was 5.9 seconds (IQR 3.9-16) (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plots mean difference and 1.96 upper and lower limits of agreement for all arteries combined were: AS 0.996 (1.33 to 0.74), VS 0.995 (1.40 to 0.71), and MS 0.995 (1.35 to 0.74). The mean bias was minimal: 0.964-1.0429. Risk class assignment showed high accuracy for the AS in total (weighed κ = 0.99) and for each individual artery (κ = 0.96-0.99) with corresponding correct risk group assignment in 497 of 505 patients (98.4 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fully automated artery-specific coronary calcium scoring algorithm is a time-saving procedure and shows excellent correlation and agreement compared with the clinically established semi-automated approach.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Very high correlation and agreement between fully automatic and semi-automatic calcium scoring software.. · Less time-consuming than conventional semi-automatic methods.. · Excellent tool for artery-specific calcium scoring in a clinical setting..</p><p><strong>Citation format: </strong>· Winkelmann MT, Jacoby J, Schwemmer C et al. Fully Automated Artery-Specific Calcium Scoring Based on Machine Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 763 - 770.</p>","PeriodicalId":520772,"journal":{"name":"RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin","volume":" ","pages":"763-770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1717-2703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of machine learning-based fully automated artery-specific coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring software, using semi-automated software as a reference.

Methods: A total of 505 patients underwent non-contrast-enhanced calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT). Automated, machine learning-based software quantified the Agatston score (AS), volume score (VS), and mass score (MS) of each coronary artery [right coronary artery (RCA), left main (LM), circumflex (CX) and left anterior descending (LAD)]. Identified CAC of readers who annotated the data with semi-automated software served as a reference standard. Statistics included comparisons of evaluation time, agreement of identified CAC, and comparisons of the AS, VS, and MS of the reference standard and the fully automated algorithm.

Results: The machine learning-based software correlated strongly with the reference standard for the AS, VS, and MS (Spearman's rho > 0.969) (p < 0.001), with excellent agreement (ICC > 0.919) (p < 0.001). The mean assessment time of the reference standard was 59 seconds (IQR 39-140) and that of the automated algorithm was 5.9 seconds (IQR 3.9-16) (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plots mean difference and 1.96 upper and lower limits of agreement for all arteries combined were: AS 0.996 (1.33 to 0.74), VS 0.995 (1.40 to 0.71), and MS 0.995 (1.35 to 0.74). The mean bias was minimal: 0.964-1.0429. Risk class assignment showed high accuracy for the AS in total (weighed κ = 0.99) and for each individual artery (κ = 0.96-0.99) with corresponding correct risk group assignment in 497 of 505 patients (98.4 %).

Conclusion: The fully automated artery-specific coronary calcium scoring algorithm is a time-saving procedure and shows excellent correlation and agreement compared with the clinically established semi-automated approach.

Key points: · Very high correlation and agreement between fully automatic and semi-automatic calcium scoring software.. · Less time-consuming than conventional semi-automatic methods.. · Excellent tool for artery-specific calcium scoring in a clinical setting..

Citation format: · Winkelmann MT, Jacoby J, Schwemmer C et al. Fully Automated Artery-Specific Calcium Scoring Based on Machine Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 763 - 770.

低剂量计算机断层扫描中基于机器学习的全自动动脉特异性钙评分。
目的:评价基于机器学习的全自动动脉特异性冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分软件,以半自动软件为参考。方法:505例患者行非对比增强钙评分计算机断层扫描(CSCT)。基于机器学习的自动化软件量化了每条冠状动脉[右冠状动脉(RCA)、左主干(LM)、旋支(CX)和左前降支(LAD)]的Agatston评分(AS)、体积评分(VS)和质量评分(MS)。用半自动化软件作为参考标准,确定了注释数据的读者的CAC。统计包括评价时间的比较,确定的CAC的一致性,参考标准和全自动算法的AS、VS和MS的比较。结果:基于机器学习的软件与AS、VS、MS参考标准相关性强(Spearman’s rho > 0.969) (p 0.919) (p结论:与临床建立的半自动方法相比,全自动动脉特异性冠状动脉钙评分算法节省时间,具有良好的相关性和一致性。·全自动和半自动钙评分软件之间的相关性和一致性非常高。·比传统的半自动方法更省时。·临床环境中动脉特异性钙评分的优秀工具。引文格式:·Winkelmann MT, Jacoby J, Schwemmer C等。低剂量计算机断层扫描中基于机器学习的全自动动脉特异性钙评分。Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022;194: 763 - 770。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书