Moritz T Winkelmann, Johann Jacoby, Chris Schwemmer, Sebastian Faby, Patrick Krumm, Christoph Artzner, Malte N Bongers
{"title":"Fully Automated Artery-Specific Calcium Scoring Based on Machine Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening.","authors":"Moritz T Winkelmann, Johann Jacoby, Chris Schwemmer, Sebastian Faby, Patrick Krumm, Christoph Artzner, Malte N Bongers","doi":"10.1055/a-1717-2703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluation of machine learning-based fully automated artery-specific coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring software, using semi-automated software as a reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 505 patients underwent non-contrast-enhanced calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT). Automated, machine learning-based software quantified the Agatston score (AS), volume score (VS), and mass score (MS) of each coronary artery [right coronary artery (RCA), left main (LM), circumflex (CX) and left anterior descending (LAD)]. Identified CAC of readers who annotated the data with semi-automated software served as a reference standard. Statistics included comparisons of evaluation time, agreement of identified CAC, and comparisons of the AS, VS, and MS of the reference standard and the fully automated algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The machine learning-based software correlated strongly with the reference standard for the AS, VS, and MS (Spearman's rho > 0.969) (p < 0.001), with excellent agreement (ICC > 0.919) (p < 0.001). The mean assessment time of the reference standard was 59 seconds (IQR 39-140) and that of the automated algorithm was 5.9 seconds (IQR 3.9-16) (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plots mean difference and 1.96 upper and lower limits of agreement for all arteries combined were: AS 0.996 (1.33 to 0.74), VS 0.995 (1.40 to 0.71), and MS 0.995 (1.35 to 0.74). The mean bias was minimal: 0.964-1.0429. Risk class assignment showed high accuracy for the AS in total (weighed κ = 0.99) and for each individual artery (κ = 0.96-0.99) with corresponding correct risk group assignment in 497 of 505 patients (98.4 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fully automated artery-specific coronary calcium scoring algorithm is a time-saving procedure and shows excellent correlation and agreement compared with the clinically established semi-automated approach.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Very high correlation and agreement between fully automatic and semi-automatic calcium scoring software.. · Less time-consuming than conventional semi-automatic methods.. · Excellent tool for artery-specific calcium scoring in a clinical setting..</p><p><strong>Citation format: </strong>· Winkelmann MT, Jacoby J, Schwemmer C et al. Fully Automated Artery-Specific Calcium Scoring Based on Machine Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 763 - 770.</p>","PeriodicalId":520772,"journal":{"name":"RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin","volume":" ","pages":"763-770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1717-2703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of machine learning-based fully automated artery-specific coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring software, using semi-automated software as a reference.
Methods: A total of 505 patients underwent non-contrast-enhanced calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT). Automated, machine learning-based software quantified the Agatston score (AS), volume score (VS), and mass score (MS) of each coronary artery [right coronary artery (RCA), left main (LM), circumflex (CX) and left anterior descending (LAD)]. Identified CAC of readers who annotated the data with semi-automated software served as a reference standard. Statistics included comparisons of evaluation time, agreement of identified CAC, and comparisons of the AS, VS, and MS of the reference standard and the fully automated algorithm.
Results: The machine learning-based software correlated strongly with the reference standard for the AS, VS, and MS (Spearman's rho > 0.969) (p < 0.001), with excellent agreement (ICC > 0.919) (p < 0.001). The mean assessment time of the reference standard was 59 seconds (IQR 39-140) and that of the automated algorithm was 5.9 seconds (IQR 3.9-16) (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plots mean difference and 1.96 upper and lower limits of agreement for all arteries combined were: AS 0.996 (1.33 to 0.74), VS 0.995 (1.40 to 0.71), and MS 0.995 (1.35 to 0.74). The mean bias was minimal: 0.964-1.0429. Risk class assignment showed high accuracy for the AS in total (weighed κ = 0.99) and for each individual artery (κ = 0.96-0.99) with corresponding correct risk group assignment in 497 of 505 patients (98.4 %).
Conclusion: The fully automated artery-specific coronary calcium scoring algorithm is a time-saving procedure and shows excellent correlation and agreement compared with the clinically established semi-automated approach.
Key points: · Very high correlation and agreement between fully automatic and semi-automatic calcium scoring software.. · Less time-consuming than conventional semi-automatic methods.. · Excellent tool for artery-specific calcium scoring in a clinical setting..
Citation format: · Winkelmann MT, Jacoby J, Schwemmer C et al. Fully Automated Artery-Specific Calcium Scoring Based on Machine Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 763 - 770.