Sectoral Productivity Growth, COVID-19 Shocks, and Infrastructure.

Hildegart Ahumada, Eduardo Cavallo, Santos Espina-Mairal, Fernando Navajas
{"title":"Sectoral Productivity Growth, COVID-19 Shocks, and Infrastructure.","authors":"Hildegart Ahumada,&nbsp;Eduardo Cavallo,&nbsp;Santos Espina-Mairal,&nbsp;Fernando Navajas","doi":"10.1007/s41885-021-00098-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines sectoral productivity shocks of the COVID-19 pandemic, their aggregate impact, and the possible compensatory effects of improving productivity in infrastructure-related sectors. We employ the KLEMS annual dataset for a group of OECD and Latin America and the Caribbean countries, complemented with high-frequency data for 2020. First, we estimate a panel vector autoregression of growth rates in sector level labor productivity to specify the nature and size of sectoral shocks using the historical data. We then run impulse-response simulations of one standard deviation shocks in the sectors that were most affected by COVID-19. We estimate that the pandemic cut economy-wide labor productivity by 4.9% in Latin America, and by 3.5% for the entire sample. Finally, by modeling the long-run relationship between productivity shocks in the sectors most affected by COVID-19, we find that large productivity improvements in infrastructure-equivalent to at least three times the historical rates of productivity gains-may be needed to fully compensate for the negative productivity losses traceable to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41885-021-00098-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":72868,"journal":{"name":"Economics of disasters and climate change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777183/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of disasters and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-021-00098-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper examines sectoral productivity shocks of the COVID-19 pandemic, their aggregate impact, and the possible compensatory effects of improving productivity in infrastructure-related sectors. We employ the KLEMS annual dataset for a group of OECD and Latin America and the Caribbean countries, complemented with high-frequency data for 2020. First, we estimate a panel vector autoregression of growth rates in sector level labor productivity to specify the nature and size of sectoral shocks using the historical data. We then run impulse-response simulations of one standard deviation shocks in the sectors that were most affected by COVID-19. We estimate that the pandemic cut economy-wide labor productivity by 4.9% in Latin America, and by 3.5% for the entire sample. Finally, by modeling the long-run relationship between productivity shocks in the sectors most affected by COVID-19, we find that large productivity improvements in infrastructure-equivalent to at least three times the historical rates of productivity gains-may be needed to fully compensate for the negative productivity losses traceable to COVID-19.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41885-021-00098-z.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

部门生产率增长、2019冠状病毒病冲击和基础设施。
本文考察了2019冠状病毒病大流行对部门生产率的冲击、其总体影响以及提高基础设施相关部门生产率可能产生的补偿效应。我们采用了经合组织和拉丁美洲及加勒比国家的KLEMS年度数据集,并辅以2020年的高频数据。首先,我们估计了部门水平劳动生产率增长率的面板向量自回归,以使用历史数据指定部门冲击的性质和规模。然后,我们在受COVID-19影响最严重的部门对一个标准差冲击进行脉冲响应模拟。我们估计,疫情使拉丁美洲整个经济体的劳动生产率下降了4.9%,整个样本的劳动生产率下降了3.5%。最后,通过对受COVID-19影响最严重部门的生产率冲击之间的长期关系进行建模,我们发现,可能需要大幅提高基础设施生产率(至少相当于历史生产率增长率的三倍),才能完全弥补因COVID-19造成的负面生产率损失。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s41885-021-00098-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信