Telemedicine for Cranial Radiosurgery Patients in a Rural U.S. Population: Patterns and Predictors of Patient Utilization.

Daniel T Cifarelli, Joshua S Weir, Jenifer D Slusser, Tanya M Smith, Rebecca DeWitt, Christopher P Cifarelli
{"title":"Telemedicine for Cranial Radiosurgery Patients in a Rural U.S. Population: Patterns and Predictors of Patient Utilization.","authors":"Daniel T Cifarelli,&nbsp;Joshua S Weir,&nbsp;Jenifer D Slusser,&nbsp;Tanya M Smith,&nbsp;Rebecca DeWitt,&nbsp;Christopher P Cifarelli","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Telemedicine retains potential for increasing access to specialty providers in underserved and rural communities. COVID-19 accelerated adoption of telehealth beyond rural populations, serving as a primary modality of patient-provider encounters for many nonemergent diagnoses. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From 2020 to 2021, telemedicine was incorporated in management of stereotactic radiosurgery patients. Retrospective data on diagnoses, demographics, distance to primary clinic, and encounter type were captured and statistically analyzed using descriptive measures and Cox proportional regression modeling. Graphical representation of service areas was created using geo-mapping software. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients (<i>n</i> = 208) completed 331 telemedicine encounters over 12 months. Metastases and meningiomas comprised 60% of diagnoses. Median age was 62 years with median household income and residential population of $44,752 and 7,634 people. The one-way mean and median travel distances were 74.6 and 66.3 miles. The total potential road mileage for all patients was 44,596 miles. A total of 118 (57%) patients completed video visits during the first encounter, whereas 90 (43%) opted for telephone encounters. At 12 months, 138 patients (66%) utilized video visits and 70 (34%) used telephone visits. Predictors of video visit use were video-enabled visit during the first encounter (hazard ratio [HR] 2.806, <i>p</i> < 0.001), total potential distance traveled (HR 1.681, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and the need for more than one visit per year (HR 2.903, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Telemedicine can be effective in radiosurgery practice with predictors of video-enabled use being pre-existing patient comfort levels with videoconferencing, total annual travel distance, and number of visits per year. Age, rural population status, and household income did not impact telemedicine use in our patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1317-1323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine retains potential for increasing access to specialty providers in underserved and rural communities. COVID-19 accelerated adoption of telehealth beyond rural populations, serving as a primary modality of patient-provider encounters for many nonemergent diagnoses. Methods: From 2020 to 2021, telemedicine was incorporated in management of stereotactic radiosurgery patients. Retrospective data on diagnoses, demographics, distance to primary clinic, and encounter type were captured and statistically analyzed using descriptive measures and Cox proportional regression modeling. Graphical representation of service areas was created using geo-mapping software. Results: Patients (n = 208) completed 331 telemedicine encounters over 12 months. Metastases and meningiomas comprised 60% of diagnoses. Median age was 62 years with median household income and residential population of $44,752 and 7,634 people. The one-way mean and median travel distances were 74.6 and 66.3 miles. The total potential road mileage for all patients was 44,596 miles. A total of 118 (57%) patients completed video visits during the first encounter, whereas 90 (43%) opted for telephone encounters. At 12 months, 138 patients (66%) utilized video visits and 70 (34%) used telephone visits. Predictors of video visit use were video-enabled visit during the first encounter (hazard ratio [HR] 2.806, p < 0.001), total potential distance traveled (HR 1.681, p < 0.05), and the need for more than one visit per year (HR 2.903, p < 0.001). Discussion: Telemedicine can be effective in radiosurgery practice with predictors of video-enabled use being pre-existing patient comfort levels with videoconferencing, total annual travel distance, and number of visits per year. Age, rural population status, and household income did not impact telemedicine use in our patient cohort.

美国农村地区颅骨放射外科患者的远程医疗:患者利用的模式和预测因素。
远程医疗保留了在服务不足和农村社区增加获得专业提供者的潜力。COVID-19加速了远程医疗在农村人口之外的普及,成为许多非紧急诊断的患者与提供者接触的主要方式。方法:2020 - 2021年,将远程医疗纳入立体定向放射外科患者的管理。采用描述性测量和Cox比例回归模型对诊断、人口统计学、到主要诊所的距离和偶遇类型的回顾性数据进行统计分析。使用地理制图软件创建了服务区域的图形表示。结果:患者(n = 208)在12个月内完成331次远程医疗就诊。转移瘤和脑膜瘤占诊断的60%。年龄中位数为62岁,家庭收入中位数为44,752元,居住人口中位数为7,634人。单程平均和中位数旅行距离分别为74.6英里和66.3英里。所有患者的潜在道路总里程为44,596英里。共有118名(57%)患者在第一次就诊时完成了视频就诊,而90名(43%)患者选择了电话就诊。12个月时,138名患者(66%)使用视频就诊,70名患者(34%)使用电话就诊。使用视频就诊的预测因子包括首次就诊时启用视频就诊(风险比[HR] 2.806, p < 0.001)、总潜在行走距离(HR 1.681, p < 0.05)和每年需要一次以上就诊(HR 2.903, p < 0.001)。讨论:远程医疗在放射外科实践中是有效的,视频使用的预测指标是预先存在的患者对视频会议的舒适度、每年的总旅行距离和每年的访问次数。在我们的患者队列中,年龄、农村人口状况和家庭收入对远程医疗的使用没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信