Detection of unilateral and bilateral cleft alveolus on panoramic radiographs using a deep-learning system.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-02 DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20210436
Chiaki Kuwada, Yoshiko Ariji, Yoshitaka Kise, Motoki Fukuda, Jun Ota, Hisanobu Ohara, Norinaga Kojima, Eiichiro Ariji
{"title":"Detection of unilateral and bilateral cleft alveolus on panoramic radiographs using a deep-learning system.","authors":"Chiaki Kuwada, Yoshiko Ariji, Yoshitaka Kise, Motoki Fukuda, Jun Ota, Hisanobu Ohara, Norinaga Kojima, Eiichiro Ariji","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20210436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in performance of deep-learning (DL) models with respect to the image classes and amount of training data to create an effective DL model for detecting both unilateral cleft alveoli (UCAs) and bilateral cleft alveoli (BCAs) on panoramic radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Model U was created using UCA and normal images, and Model B was created using BCA and normal images. Models C1 and C2 were created using the combined data of UCA, BCA, and normal images. The same number of CAs was used for training Models U, B, and C1, whereas Model C2 was created with a larger amount of data. The performance of all four models was evaluated with the same test data and compared with those of two human observers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recall values were 0.60, 0.73, 0.80, and 0.88 for Models A, B, C1, and C2, respectively. The results of Model C2 were highest in precision and F-measure (0.98 and 0.92) and almost the same as those of human observers. Significant differences were found in the ratios of detected to undetected CAs of Models U and C1 (<i>p</i> = 0.01), Models U and C2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and Models B and C2 (<i>p</i> = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL models trained using both UCA and BCA data (Models C1 and C2) achieved high detection performance. Moreover, the performance of a DL model may depend on the amount of training data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"20210436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in performance of deep-learning (DL) models with respect to the image classes and amount of training data to create an effective DL model for detecting both unilateral cleft alveoli (UCAs) and bilateral cleft alveoli (BCAs) on panoramic radiographs.

Methods: Model U was created using UCA and normal images, and Model B was created using BCA and normal images. Models C1 and C2 were created using the combined data of UCA, BCA, and normal images. The same number of CAs was used for training Models U, B, and C1, whereas Model C2 was created with a larger amount of data. The performance of all four models was evaluated with the same test data and compared with those of two human observers.

Results: The recall values were 0.60, 0.73, 0.80, and 0.88 for Models A, B, C1, and C2, respectively. The results of Model C2 were highest in precision and F-measure (0.98 and 0.92) and almost the same as those of human observers. Significant differences were found in the ratios of detected to undetected CAs of Models U and C1 (p = 0.01), Models U and C2 (p < 0.001), and Models B and C2 (p = 0.036).

Conclusions: The DL models trained using both UCA and BCA data (Models C1 and C2) achieved high detection performance. Moreover, the performance of a DL model may depend on the amount of training data.

利用深度学习系统在全景x线片上检测单侧和双侧牙槽裂。
目的:本研究的目的是评估深度学习(DL)模型在图像类别和训练数据量方面的性能差异,以创建一个有效的深度学习模型,用于检测全景x线片上的单侧肺泡裂(UCAs)和双侧肺泡裂(bca)。方法:采用UCA和正常图像创建U模型,采用BCA和正常图像创建B模型。采用UCA、BCA和正常图像的组合数据建立C1和C2模型。同样数量的ca用于训练模型U、B和C1,而模型C2是用更大的数据量创建的。使用相同的测试数据评估所有四种模型的性能,并与两名人类观察者的性能进行比较。结果:A、B、C1、C2的召回值分别为0.60、0.73、0.80、0.88。C2模型的结果在精度和f值上最高(0.98和0.92),与人类观察者的结果几乎相同。模型U和C1、模型U和C2、模型B和C2检测到的ca与未检测到的ca的比值差异有统计学意义(p = 0.01)。结论:同时使用UCA和BCA数据(模型C1和C2)训练的DL模型具有较高的检测性能。此外,深度学习模型的性能可能取决于训练数据的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信