{"title":"Detection of unilateral and bilateral cleft alveolus on panoramic radiographs using a deep-learning system.","authors":"Chiaki Kuwada, Yoshiko Ariji, Yoshitaka Kise, Motoki Fukuda, Jun Ota, Hisanobu Ohara, Norinaga Kojima, Eiichiro Ariji","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20210436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in performance of deep-learning (DL) models with respect to the image classes and amount of training data to create an effective DL model for detecting both unilateral cleft alveoli (UCAs) and bilateral cleft alveoli (BCAs) on panoramic radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Model U was created using UCA and normal images, and Model B was created using BCA and normal images. Models C1 and C2 were created using the combined data of UCA, BCA, and normal images. The same number of CAs was used for training Models U, B, and C1, whereas Model C2 was created with a larger amount of data. The performance of all four models was evaluated with the same test data and compared with those of two human observers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recall values were 0.60, 0.73, 0.80, and 0.88 for Models A, B, C1, and C2, respectively. The results of Model C2 were highest in precision and F-measure (0.98 and 0.92) and almost the same as those of human observers. Significant differences were found in the ratios of detected to undetected CAs of Models U and C1 (<i>p</i> = 0.01), Models U and C2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and Models B and C2 (<i>p</i> = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL models trained using both UCA and BCA data (Models C1 and C2) achieved high detection performance. Moreover, the performance of a DL model may depend on the amount of training data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"20210436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in performance of deep-learning (DL) models with respect to the image classes and amount of training data to create an effective DL model for detecting both unilateral cleft alveoli (UCAs) and bilateral cleft alveoli (BCAs) on panoramic radiographs.
Methods: Model U was created using UCA and normal images, and Model B was created using BCA and normal images. Models C1 and C2 were created using the combined data of UCA, BCA, and normal images. The same number of CAs was used for training Models U, B, and C1, whereas Model C2 was created with a larger amount of data. The performance of all four models was evaluated with the same test data and compared with those of two human observers.
Results: The recall values were 0.60, 0.73, 0.80, and 0.88 for Models A, B, C1, and C2, respectively. The results of Model C2 were highest in precision and F-measure (0.98 and 0.92) and almost the same as those of human observers. Significant differences were found in the ratios of detected to undetected CAs of Models U and C1 (p = 0.01), Models U and C2 (p < 0.001), and Models B and C2 (p = 0.036).
Conclusions: The DL models trained using both UCA and BCA data (Models C1 and C2) achieved high detection performance. Moreover, the performance of a DL model may depend on the amount of training data.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X