Soo Jin Na, Dong Kyu Oh, Sunghoon Park, Yeon Joo Lee, Sang-Bum Hong, Mi-Hyun Park, Ryoung-Eun Ko, Chae-Man Lim, Kyeongman Jeon
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Neutropenic Sepsis: A Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Soo Jin Na, Dong Kyu Oh, Sunghoon Park, Yeon Joo Lee, Sang-Bum Hong, Mi-Hyun Park, Ryoung-Eun Ko, Chae-Man Lim, Kyeongman Jeon","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000001907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in patients with neutropenia; however, data on whether neutropenic sepsis is associated with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes are limited. Thus, this study was designed to clarify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with neutropenic sepsis compared with those of patients without neutropenic sepsis diagnosed based on the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance, a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with sepsis from September 2019 to February 2020. Eligible patients were divided into the neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count of less than 1,500/mL) and non- neutropenic groups. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 2,074 patients were enrolled from 16 tertiary referral or university-affiliated hospitals. Of them, 218 (10.5%) had neutropenia. The neutropenia group was younger and had a lower proportion of patients with chronic diseases compared with the non-neutropenia group. However, solid tumors (50.0% vs. 34.1%; P > 0.001) and hematological malignancies (40.8% vs. 3.8%; P < 0.001) were more common in the neutropenia group. The neutropenia group had a higher incidence of septic shock (43.6% vs. 22.9%; P < 0.001) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (7 vs. 5; P < 0.001) than the nonneutropenia group. However, no significant differences in microbiologically confirmed infections and its pathogen distribution and the incidence of multidrug resistance were observed between the two groups. The neutropenic group had a higher hospital mortality than the non-neutropenic group (42.2% vs. 26.3%; P < 0.001), and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant difference in survival within 1 week after diagnosing sepsis (log-rank test, P = 0.002). The incidence of adverse events during intensive care unit admission was not different between the two groups. Among hospital survivors, the neutropenic group was more frequently discharged to home (72.2% vs. 57.8%; P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neutropenic sepsis is associated with a higher-grade organ dysfunction during the diagnosis of sepsis and higher mortality without difference in the pathogen isolated.</p>","PeriodicalId":238832,"journal":{"name":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","volume":" ","pages":"659-665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in patients with neutropenia; however, data on whether neutropenic sepsis is associated with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes are limited. Thus, this study was designed to clarify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with neutropenic sepsis compared with those of patients without neutropenic sepsis diagnosed based on the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria.
Methods: We analyzed data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance, a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with sepsis from September 2019 to February 2020. Eligible patients were divided into the neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count of less than 1,500/mL) and non- neutropenic groups. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results: During the study period, 2,074 patients were enrolled from 16 tertiary referral or university-affiliated hospitals. Of them, 218 (10.5%) had neutropenia. The neutropenia group was younger and had a lower proportion of patients with chronic diseases compared with the non-neutropenia group. However, solid tumors (50.0% vs. 34.1%; P > 0.001) and hematological malignancies (40.8% vs. 3.8%; P < 0.001) were more common in the neutropenia group. The neutropenia group had a higher incidence of septic shock (43.6% vs. 22.9%; P < 0.001) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (7 vs. 5; P < 0.001) than the nonneutropenia group. However, no significant differences in microbiologically confirmed infections and its pathogen distribution and the incidence of multidrug resistance were observed between the two groups. The neutropenic group had a higher hospital mortality than the non-neutropenic group (42.2% vs. 26.3%; P < 0.001), and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant difference in survival within 1 week after diagnosing sepsis (log-rank test, P = 0.002). The incidence of adverse events during intensive care unit admission was not different between the two groups. Among hospital survivors, the neutropenic group was more frequently discharged to home (72.2% vs. 57.8%; P = 0.002).
Conclusions: Neutropenic sepsis is associated with a higher-grade organ dysfunction during the diagnosis of sepsis and higher mortality without difference in the pathogen isolated.
背景:脓毒症是中性粒细胞减少症患者死亡的主要原因;然而,关于中性粒细胞减少性败血症是否与不同的临床特征和结果相关的数据有限。因此,本研究旨在澄清中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症患者的临床特征和结局,并将其与根据第三次国际共识定义脓毒症和感染性休克标准诊断的无中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症患者进行比较。方法:我们分析了韩国脓毒症联盟的数据,这是一项全国性的前瞻性多中心队列研究,评估了2019年9月至2020年2月脓毒症患者的临床特征、管理和结局。符合条件的患者被分为中性粒细胞减少组(绝对中性粒细胞计数小于1500 /mL)和非中性粒细胞减少组。比较两组患者的特点和结局。结果:在研究期间,来自16所三级转诊医院或大学附属医院的2,074名患者入组。其中中性粒细胞减少218例(10.5%)。与非中性粒细胞减少组相比,中性粒细胞减少组更年轻,慢性疾病患者比例更低。然而,实体瘤(50.0% vs. 34.1%;P > 0.001)和血液恶性肿瘤(40.8% vs. 3.8%;结论:中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症与脓毒症诊断时较高程度的器官功能障碍和较高的死亡率相关,而分离的病原体没有差异。