Chasing the storm: Recruiting non-hospitalized patients for a multi-site randomized controlled trial in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-24 DOI:10.1111/cts.13211
Kelly Hu, Jean-Claude Tardif, Melanie Huber, Maria Daly, Aisha T Langford, Ruth Kirby, Yves Rosenberg, Judith Hochman, Avni Joshi, Zohar Bassevitch, Michael H Pillinger, Binita Shah
{"title":"Chasing the storm: Recruiting non-hospitalized patients for a multi-site randomized controlled trial in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Kelly Hu,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Tardif,&nbsp;Melanie Huber,&nbsp;Maria Daly,&nbsp;Aisha T Langford,&nbsp;Ruth Kirby,&nbsp;Yves Rosenberg,&nbsp;Judith Hochman,&nbsp;Avni Joshi,&nbsp;Zohar Bassevitch,&nbsp;Michael H Pillinger,&nbsp;Binita Shah","doi":"10.1111/cts.13211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard to evaluate clinical interventions, producing the highest level of evidence while minimizing potential bias. Inadequate recruitment is a commonly encountered problem that undermines the completion and generalizability of RCTs-and is even more challenging when enrolling amidst a pandemic. Here, we reflect on our experiences with virtual recruitment of non-hospitalized patients in the United States for ColCorona, an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) drug trial. Recruitment challenges during a pandemic include constraints created by shelter-in-place policies and targeting enrollment according to national and local fluctuations in infection rate. Presenting a study to potential participants who are sick with COVID-19 and may be frightened, overwhelmed, or mistrusting of clinical research remains a challenge. Strategies previously reported to improve recruitment include transparency, patient and site education, financial incentives, and person-to-person outreach. Active measures taken during ColCorona to optimize United States recruitment involved rapid expansion of sites, adjustment of recruitment scripts, assessing telephone calls versus text messages for initial contact with participants, institutional review board-approved financial compensation, creating an infrastructure to systematically identify potentially eligible patients, partnering with testing sites, appealing to both self-interest and altruism, and large-scale media efforts with varying degrees of success.</p>","PeriodicalId":501617,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Science","volume":" ","pages":"831-837"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/d0/CTS-15-831.PMC9010275.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard to evaluate clinical interventions, producing the highest level of evidence while minimizing potential bias. Inadequate recruitment is a commonly encountered problem that undermines the completion and generalizability of RCTs-and is even more challenging when enrolling amidst a pandemic. Here, we reflect on our experiences with virtual recruitment of non-hospitalized patients in the United States for ColCorona, an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) drug trial. Recruitment challenges during a pandemic include constraints created by shelter-in-place policies and targeting enrollment according to national and local fluctuations in infection rate. Presenting a study to potential participants who are sick with COVID-19 and may be frightened, overwhelmed, or mistrusting of clinical research remains a challenge. Strategies previously reported to improve recruitment include transparency, patient and site education, financial incentives, and person-to-person outreach. Active measures taken during ColCorona to optimize United States recruitment involved rapid expansion of sites, adjustment of recruitment scripts, assessing telephone calls versus text messages for initial contact with participants, institutional review board-approved financial compensation, creating an infrastructure to systematically identify potentially eligible patients, partnering with testing sites, appealing to both self-interest and altruism, and large-scale media efforts with varying degrees of success.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

追逐风暴:在COVID-19大流行期间,在美国招募非住院患者进行多地点随机对照试验。
随机对照试验(rct)仍然是评估临床干预措施的金标准,在最大限度地减少潜在偏倚的同时产生最高水平的证据。招募不足是一个经常遇到的问题,它破坏了随机对照试验的完成性和普遍性,而且在大流行期间招募时更具挑战性。在这里,我们反思了我们在美国虚拟招募非住院患者的经验,ColCorona是一项国际、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)药物试验。大流行期间的招聘挑战包括就地收容政策造成的限制,以及根据国家和地方感染率的波动确定招生目标。向那些感染了COVID-19、可能害怕、不知所措或不信任临床研究的潜在参与者介绍一项研究仍然是一项挑战。以前报道的改善招聘的策略包括透明度、患者和现场教育、财政激励和个人对个人的推广。在ColCorona期间,为优化美国的招聘而采取的积极措施包括:迅速扩大招聘地点、调整招聘剧本、评估与参与者初步联系的电话与短信、机构审查委员会批准的经济补偿、创建系统识别潜在合格患者的基础设施、与测试地点合作、呼吁自身利益和利他主义,大规模的媒体宣传也取得了不同程度的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信