How to gauge investor behavior? A comparison of online investor sentiment measures.

Digital finance Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s42521-021-00038-2
Daniele Ballinari, Simon Behrendt
{"title":"How to gauge investor behavior? A comparison of online investor sentiment measures.","authors":"Daniele Ballinari, Simon Behrendt","doi":"10.1007/s42521-021-00038-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the increasing interest in and the growing number of publicly available methods to estimate investor sentiment from social media platforms, researchers and practitioners alike are facing one crucial question - which is best to gauge investor sentiment? We compare the performance of daily investor sentiment measures estimated from Twitter and StockTwits short messages by publicly available dictionary and machine learning based methods for a large sample of stocks. To determine their relevance for financial applications, these investor sentiment measures are compared by their effects on the cross-section of stocks (i) within a Fama and MacBeth (J Polit Econ 81:607-636, 1973) regression framework applied to a measure of retail investors' order imbalances and (ii) by their ability to forecast abnormal returns in a model-free portfolio sorting exercise. Interestingly, we find that investor sentiment measures based on finance-specific dictionaries do not only have a greater impact on retail investors' order imbalances than measures based on machine learning approaches, but also perform very well compared to the latter in our asset pricing application.</p>","PeriodicalId":72817,"journal":{"name":"Digital finance","volume":"3 2","pages":"169-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-021-00038-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the increasing interest in and the growing number of publicly available methods to estimate investor sentiment from social media platforms, researchers and practitioners alike are facing one crucial question - which is best to gauge investor sentiment? We compare the performance of daily investor sentiment measures estimated from Twitter and StockTwits short messages by publicly available dictionary and machine learning based methods for a large sample of stocks. To determine their relevance for financial applications, these investor sentiment measures are compared by their effects on the cross-section of stocks (i) within a Fama and MacBeth (J Polit Econ 81:607-636, 1973) regression framework applied to a measure of retail investors' order imbalances and (ii) by their ability to forecast abnormal returns in a model-free portfolio sorting exercise. Interestingly, we find that investor sentiment measures based on finance-specific dictionaries do not only have a greater impact on retail investors' order imbalances than measures based on machine learning approaches, but also perform very well compared to the latter in our asset pricing application.

如何衡量投资者行为?在线投资者情绪测量比较。
鉴于人们对从社交媒体平台估算投资者情绪的兴趣与日俱增,公开可用的估算方法也越来越多,研究人员和从业人员都面临着一个关键问题--哪种方法最能衡量投资者情绪?我们比较了通过 Twitter 和 StockTwits 短消息估算出的每日投资者情绪指标的性能,这些指标是通过公开可用的字典方法和基于机器学习的方法对大量股票样本进行估算得出的。为了确定它们在金融应用中的相关性,我们比较了这些投资者情绪度量对股票横截面的影响:(i) 在 Fama 和 MacBeth(J Polit Econ 81:607-636,1973 年)回归框架中应用于散户投资者订单不平衡度量的影响;(ii) 在无模型投资组合排序中预测异常回报的能力。有趣的是,我们发现,与基于机器学习方法的测量方法相比,基于金融特定词典的投资者情绪测量方法不仅对散户投资者的订单失衡有更大的影响,而且在我们的资产定价应用中与后者相比表现非常出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信