Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates in patients undergoing MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with two different software-based systems.

The Prostate Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-03 DOI:10.1002/pros.24264
Julian Hanske, Yannic Risse, Florian Roghmann, Daniel Pucheril, Sebastian Berg, Karl H Tully, Nicolas von Landenberg, Jan Wald, Joachim Noldus, Marko Brock
{"title":"Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates in patients undergoing MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with two different software-based systems.","authors":"Julian Hanske,&nbsp;Yannic Risse,&nbsp;Florian Roghmann,&nbsp;Daniel Pucheril,&nbsp;Sebastian Berg,&nbsp;Karl H Tully,&nbsp;Nicolas von Landenberg,&nbsp;Jan Wald,&nbsp;Joachim Noldus,&nbsp;Marko Brock","doi":"10.1002/pros.24264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is a routinely used diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, a clear superiority of the optimal approach for software-based MRI processing during biopsy procedures is still unanswered. To investigate the impact of robotic approach and software-based image processing (rigid vs. elastic) during MRI/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) on overall and clinically significant (cs) PCa detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study relied on the instructional retrospective biopsy data collected data between September 2013 and August 2017. Overall, 241 men with at least one suspicious lesion (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on multiparametric MRI underwent FBx. The study protocol contains a systematic 12-core sextant biopsy plus 2 cores per targeted lesion. One experienced urologist performed 1048 targeted biopsy cores; 467 (45%) cores were obtained using rigid processing, while the remaining 581 (55%) cores relied on elastic image processing. CsPCa was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥ 2. The effect of rigid versus elastic FBx on overall and csPCa detection rates was determined. Propensity score weighting and multivariable regression models were used to account for potential biases inherent to the retrospective study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariable regression analyses, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and PIRADS ≥ 3 lesion were related to higher odds of finding csPCa. Elastic software-based image processing was independently associated with a higher overall PCa (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6 [2.2-6.1], p < 0.001) and csPCa (OR = 4.8 [2.6-8.8], p < 0.001) detection, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to existing literature, our results suggest that the robotic-driven software registration with elastic fusion might have a substantial effect on PCa detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"227-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is a routinely used diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, a clear superiority of the optimal approach for software-based MRI processing during biopsy procedures is still unanswered. To investigate the impact of robotic approach and software-based image processing (rigid vs. elastic) during MRI/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) on overall and clinically significant (cs) PCa detection.

Methods: The study relied on the instructional retrospective biopsy data collected data between September 2013 and August 2017. Overall, 241 men with at least one suspicious lesion (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on multiparametric MRI underwent FBx. The study protocol contains a systematic 12-core sextant biopsy plus 2 cores per targeted lesion. One experienced urologist performed 1048 targeted biopsy cores; 467 (45%) cores were obtained using rigid processing, while the remaining 581 (55%) cores relied on elastic image processing. CsPCa was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥ 2. The effect of rigid versus elastic FBx on overall and csPCa detection rates was determined. Propensity score weighting and multivariable regression models were used to account for potential biases inherent to the retrospective study design.

Results: In multivariable regression analyses, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and PIRADS ≥ 3 lesion were related to higher odds of finding csPCa. Elastic software-based image processing was independently associated with a higher overall PCa (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6 [2.2-6.1], p < 0.001) and csPCa (OR = 4.8 [2.6-8.8], p < 0.001) detection, respectively.

Conclusions: Contrary to existing literature, our results suggest that the robotic-driven software registration with elastic fusion might have a substantial effect on PCa detection.

两种不同软件系统下MRI/TRUS融合前列腺活检患者前列腺癌检出率的比较
背景:磁共振成像(MRI)靶向前列腺活检是前列腺癌(PCa)检测的常规诊断工具。然而,在活检过程中,基于软件的MRI处理的最佳方法的明显优势仍然没有答案。研究机器人方法和基于软件的图像处理(刚性与弹性)在MRI/经直肠超声(TRUS)融合前列腺活检(FBx)中对总体和临床意义(cs) PCa检测的影响。方法:本研究基于2013年9月至2017年8月收集的指导性回顾性活检数据。总体而言,241名在多参数MRI上至少有一个可疑病变(PI-RADS≥3)的男性接受了FBx检查。研究方案包括系统的12核六分仪活检,每个目标病变加2核。一位经验丰富的泌尿科医生进行了1048例靶向活检;使用刚性处理获得467(45%)个核心,而剩余的581(55%)个核心依赖于弹性图像处理。CsPCa定义为国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级≥2级。确定了刚性和弹性FBx对总体和csPCa检出率的影响。倾向评分加权和多变量回归模型用于解释回顾性研究设计固有的潜在偏差。结果:在多变量回归分析中,年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、PIRADS≥3的病变与csPCa的高发现率相关。基于弹性软件的图像处理与更高的总体PCa独立相关(比值比[OR] = 3.6 [2.2-6.1], p)。结论:与现有文献相反,我们的研究结果表明,机器人驱动的软件配准与弹性融合可能对PCa检测有实质性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信