A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Geriatrics Update: Clinical Pearls Course.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Peter Hoang, Lindsay Torbiak, Zahra Goodarzi, Heidi N Schmaltz
{"title":"A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Geriatrics Update: Clinical Pearls Course.","authors":"Peter Hoang,&nbsp;Lindsay Torbiak,&nbsp;Zahra Goodarzi,&nbsp;Heidi N Schmaltz","doi":"10.5770/cgj.24.503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Annual Geriatrics Update: Clinical Pearls Course (Geriatrics Update) is a one-day, continuing medical education (CME) course designed to enhance geriatrics competency for family physicians (FPs), given increasing population age and complexity. We aimed to evaluate how the course meets FPs' perceived learning needs and identify modifications that may better support FPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive data from 2018-2019 course evaluation surveys including demographic data, evaluations, and narrative feedback from participating FPs. Semi-structured phone and video-conferenced interviews with FPs were thematically analyzed each year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation surveys had high response rates of FPs (52 or 61% in 2018; 39 or 58% in 2019). Most FP respondents (84% in 2018 and 82% in 2019) intended to make practice changes. FPs were significantly (<i>p</i>=.001) more confident on course objectives after the course in both years. All interviewees (n=20) described fulfilled perceived and unperceived learning needs and planned to return. The Geriatrics Update course is the primary source of Geriatrics CME for 60% of interviewees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iterative evaluation of Geriatrics Update identified that the course is well received, and often FPs primary source of geriatric CME. Interviews provided additional context and descriptive feedback to improve course delivery and better meet FP learning needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"24 4","pages":"304-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dd/06/cgj-24-304.PMC8629497.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Annual Geriatrics Update: Clinical Pearls Course (Geriatrics Update) is a one-day, continuing medical education (CME) course designed to enhance geriatrics competency for family physicians (FPs), given increasing population age and complexity. We aimed to evaluate how the course meets FPs' perceived learning needs and identify modifications that may better support FPs.

Methods: Descriptive data from 2018-2019 course evaluation surveys including demographic data, evaluations, and narrative feedback from participating FPs. Semi-structured phone and video-conferenced interviews with FPs were thematically analyzed each year.

Results: Evaluation surveys had high response rates of FPs (52 or 61% in 2018; 39 or 58% in 2019). Most FP respondents (84% in 2018 and 82% in 2019) intended to make practice changes. FPs were significantly (p=.001) more confident on course objectives after the course in both years. All interviewees (n=20) described fulfilled perceived and unperceived learning needs and planned to return. The Geriatrics Update course is the primary source of Geriatrics CME for 60% of interviewees.

Conclusions: Iterative evaluation of Geriatrics Update identified that the course is well received, and often FPs primary source of geriatric CME. Interviews provided additional context and descriptive feedback to improve course delivery and better meet FP learning needs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

老年病学更新:临床珍珠课程的定性和定量分析。
背景:卡尔加里大学卡明医学院年度老年病学更新:临床珍珠课程(老年病学更新)是一个为期一天的继续医学教育(CME)课程,旨在提高家庭医生(FPs)的老年病学能力,考虑到人口老龄化和复杂性的增加。我们的目的是评估课程如何满足FPs的感知学习需求,并确定可能更好地支持FPs的修改。方法:描述性数据来自2018-2019年课程评估调查,包括人口统计数据、评估和参与FPs的叙述反馈。每年对FPs的半结构化电话和视频会议采访进行主题分析。结果:2018年评价问卷的应答率较高(52%或61%);39%, 2019年为58%)。大多数计划生育受访者(2018年为84%,2019年为82%)打算在实践中做出改变。两年后,FPs对课程目标的信心显著增强(p=.001)。所有受访者(n=20)都描述了满足的感知和未感知的学习需求,并计划返回。对于60%的受访者来说,老年医学更新课程是老年医学CME的主要来源。结论:对《老年医学更新》的反复评估表明,该课程很受欢迎,通常是FPs的主要老年CME来源。访谈提供了额外的背景和描述性反馈,以改进课程交付并更好地满足FP学习需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信