[Disability management in the international context: a systematic review of reviews].

IF 0.4 Q3 Medicine
Giuseppe La Torre, Silvia Paoletti, Ferdinando Petronzi, Cristina Sestili
{"title":"[Disability management in the international context: a systematic review of reviews].","authors":"Giuseppe La Torre,&nbsp;Silvia Paoletti,&nbsp;Ferdinando Petronzi,&nbsp;Cristina Sestili","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Background. Disability Management (DM) was born to improve workers' health and to optimize return to work for people with disabilities. Objectives. The objective of this study was to elaborate a review of reviews published in literature on the use of Disability Management in international contexts and the strategies used to facilitate the return to work for individuals with cronic disabilities or post injury. Methods. The present review was carried out by consulting the Pubmed and Scopus database from 1994 to January 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Initially, the duplicates were removed. Then, the eligible studies were selected through a multistep approach (title evaluation, abstract and full-text). The systematic reviews were evaluated using the AMSTAR method, while for the narrative reviews the INSA scale was used. Results. The research produced 186 results. Following the removal of the duplicates and articles with no available or not pertinent full text, 51 reviews were included: 17 systematic and 34 narrative. The analyzed studies were related to the DM policies of the United States, Canada and UK. Ten topics emerged, the most frequent ones including: possible solutions to adopt in the event of workers with musculo-skeletal diseases (50% of the studies); legal matters regarding issues of mental health and stress (41.2%). The quality of the articles was generally high. Discussion. The systematic review showed that the research activity on DM is conducted mainly in the Anglo-Saxon world. This review can give some interesting insights for the full implementation of DM at the national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12674,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","volume":"43 4","pages":"357-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Disability Management (DM) was born to improve workers' health and to optimize return to work for people with disabilities. Objectives. The objective of this study was to elaborate a review of reviews published in literature on the use of Disability Management in international contexts and the strategies used to facilitate the return to work for individuals with cronic disabilities or post injury. Methods. The present review was carried out by consulting the Pubmed and Scopus database from 1994 to January 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Initially, the duplicates were removed. Then, the eligible studies were selected through a multistep approach (title evaluation, abstract and full-text). The systematic reviews were evaluated using the AMSTAR method, while for the narrative reviews the INSA scale was used. Results. The research produced 186 results. Following the removal of the duplicates and articles with no available or not pertinent full text, 51 reviews were included: 17 systematic and 34 narrative. The analyzed studies were related to the DM policies of the United States, Canada and UK. Ten topics emerged, the most frequent ones including: possible solutions to adopt in the event of workers with musculo-skeletal diseases (50% of the studies); legal matters regarding issues of mental health and stress (41.2%). The quality of the articles was generally high. Discussion. The systematic review showed that the research activity on DM is conducted mainly in the Anglo-Saxon world. This review can give some interesting insights for the full implementation of DM at the national level.

[国际范围内的残疾管理:对审查的系统审查]。
摘要:背景。残疾管理(DM)的诞生是为了改善工人的健康和优化残疾人重返工作岗位。目标。本研究的目的是详细审查在国际背景下使用残疾管理的文献,以及用于促进慢性残疾或受伤后个人重返工作岗位的策略。方法。根据PRISMA指南,本综述是通过咨询Pubmed和Scopus数据库从1994年到2021年1月进行的。最初,删除了重复项。然后,通过标题评价、摘要和全文等多步骤筛选符合条件的研究。系统评价采用AMSTAR方法,叙述性评价采用INSA量表。结果。这项研究产生了186个结果。在删除重复和没有或没有相关全文的文章后,列入了51篇评论:17篇系统评论和34篇叙述评论。所分析的研究与美国、加拿大和英国的糖尿病政策有关。出现了10个主题,最常见的主题包括:在患有肌肉骨骼疾病的工人中可能采取的解决方案(占研究的50%);与心理健康和压力问题有关的法律事务(41.2%)。这些商品的质量总体上是高的。讨论。系统评价表明,对DM的研究活动主要在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界进行。这一审查可以为在国家一级全面实施DM提供一些有趣的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信