Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q1 Medicine
BMJ Open Science Pub Date : 2020-02-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjos-2019-100047
Josephine M Thomas, Catriona J Cunningham, Catherine B Lawrence, Emmanuel Pinteaux, Stuart M Allan
{"title":"Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Josephine M Thomas,&nbsp;Catriona J Cunningham,&nbsp;Catherine B Lawrence,&nbsp;Emmanuel Pinteaux,&nbsp;Stuart M Allan","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2019-100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently there is a paucity of clinically available regenerative therapies for stroke. Extracellular vesicles (EV) have been investigated for their potential as modulators of regeneration in the poststroke brain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a summary of the efficacy of therapeutic EVs in preclinical stroke models, to inform future research in this emerging field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were identified by a comprehensive literature search of two online sources and subsequent screening. Studies using lesion volume or neurological score as outcome measures were included. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs were calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood random effects model. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's regression and presented as funnel plots with trim and fill analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effects of different study variables. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the CAMARADES checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 publications were included in the systematic review, of which 19 were assessed in the meta-analysis (43 comparisons). Overall, EV interventions improved lesion volume (SMD: -1.95, 95% CI -2.72 to 1.18) and neurological scores (SMD: -1.26, 95% CI -1.64 to 0.87) compared with control groups. Funnel plots were asymmetrical suggesting publication bias, and trim and fill analysis predicted seven missing studies for lesion volume. Subgroup analysis suggested administration at 0-23 hours after stroke was the most effective timepoint for EV treatment. The median score on the CAMARADES checklist was 7 (IQR: 5-8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVs may offer a promising new avenue for stroke therapies, as EV-based interventions had positive impacts on lesion volume and neurological score in preclinical stroke models.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42019134925.</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":" ","pages":"e100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjos-2019-100047","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2019-100047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objectives: Currently there is a paucity of clinically available regenerative therapies for stroke. Extracellular vesicles (EV) have been investigated for their potential as modulators of regeneration in the poststroke brain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a summary of the efficacy of therapeutic EVs in preclinical stroke models, to inform future research in this emerging field.

Methods: Studies were identified by a comprehensive literature search of two online sources and subsequent screening. Studies using lesion volume or neurological score as outcome measures were included. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs were calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood random effects model. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's regression and presented as funnel plots with trim and fill analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effects of different study variables. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the CAMARADES checklist.

Results: A total of 20 publications were included in the systematic review, of which 19 were assessed in the meta-analysis (43 comparisons). Overall, EV interventions improved lesion volume (SMD: -1.95, 95% CI -2.72 to 1.18) and neurological scores (SMD: -1.26, 95% CI -1.64 to 0.87) compared with control groups. Funnel plots were asymmetrical suggesting publication bias, and trim and fill analysis predicted seven missing studies for lesion volume. Subgroup analysis suggested administration at 0-23 hours after stroke was the most effective timepoint for EV treatment. The median score on the CAMARADES checklist was 7 (IQR: 5-8).

Conclusions: EVs may offer a promising new avenue for stroke therapies, as EV-based interventions had positive impacts on lesion volume and neurological score in preclinical stroke models.

Prospero registration number: CRD42019134925.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

细胞外囊泡在临床前卒中模型中的治疗潜力:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:目前临床上可用于中风的再生疗法缺乏。细胞外囊泡(EV)作为脑卒中后再生调节剂的潜力已被研究。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在总结治疗性ev在临床前卒中模型中的疗效,为这一新兴领域的未来研究提供信息。方法:通过两个在线来源的综合文献检索和随后的筛选来确定研究。纳入了以病变体积或神经学评分作为结局指标的研究。标准化平均差(SMD)和95% ci采用限制最大似然随机效应模型计算。用Egger’s回归评估发表偏倚,并以漏斗图的形式表示,采用修剪和填充分析。进行亚组分析以评估不同研究变量的影响。使用CAMARADES检查表评估研究质量和偏倚风险。结果:系统评价共纳入20篇出版物,其中19篇纳入meta分析(43篇比较)。总体而言,与对照组相比,EV干预改善了病变体积(SMD: -1.95, 95% CI -2.72至1.18)和神经学评分(SMD: -1.26, 95% CI -1.64至0.87)。漏斗图不对称,表明发表偏倚,修剪和填充分析预测了7项关于病变体积的缺失研究。亚组分析显示,脑卒中后0-23小时给药是EV治疗最有效的时间点。CAMARADES检查表的中位得分为7分(IQR: 5-8)。结论:基于ev的干预对临床前脑卒中模型的病变体积和神经学评分有积极影响,可能为脑卒中治疗提供了一条有希望的新途径。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42019134925。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Science
BMJ Open Science Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信