Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components.

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2021-09-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087
Rachel C Sisodia, Dan Ellis, Michael Hidrue, Pamela Linov, Elena Cavallo, Allison S Bryant, May Wakamatsu, Marcela G Del Carmen
{"title":"Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components.","authors":"Rachel C Sisodia,&nbsp;Dan Ellis,&nbsp;Michael Hidrue,&nbsp;Pamela Linov,&nbsp;Elena Cavallo,&nbsp;Allison S Bryant,&nbsp;May Wakamatsu,&nbsp;Marcela G Del Carmen","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large tertiary academic medical centre.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study included 1318 women undergoing hysterectomy as part of our ERAS pathway between 1 February 2018 and 30 January 2020 and a matched historical cohort of all hysterectomies performed at our institution between 3 October 2016 and 30 January 2018 (n=1063).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The addition of ERAS to perioperative care.This is a cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical centre after ERAS implementation on 1 February 2018. Compliance and outcomes after ERAS roll out were monitored and managed by a centralised team. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, interrupted time series analysis were used as indicated.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Impact of ERAS process measure adherence on length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After initiation of ERAS pathway, 1318 women underwent hysterectomy. There were more open surgeries after ERAS implementation, but cohorts were otherwise balanced. The impact of process measure adherence on length of stay varied based on surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open). For open surgery, compliance with intraoperative antiemetics (-30%, 95% CI -18% to 40%) and decreased postoperative fluid administration (-12%, 95% CI -1% to 21%) were significantly associated with reduced length of stay. For minimally invasive surgery, ambulation within 8 hours of surgery was associated with reduced length of stay (-53%, 95% CI -55% to 52%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While adherence to overall ERAS protocols decreases length of stay, the specific components of the bundle most significantly impacting this outcome remain elusive. Our data identify early ambulation, use of antiemetics and decreasing postoperative fluid administration to be associated with decreased length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/4b/bmjsit-2021-000087.PMC8749327.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery.

Design: A cohort study.

Setting: Large tertiary academic medical centre.

Participants: The study included 1318 women undergoing hysterectomy as part of our ERAS pathway between 1 February 2018 and 30 January 2020 and a matched historical cohort of all hysterectomies performed at our institution between 3 October 2016 and 30 January 2018 (n=1063).

Intervention: The addition of ERAS to perioperative care.This is a cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical centre after ERAS implementation on 1 February 2018. Compliance and outcomes after ERAS roll out were monitored and managed by a centralised team. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, interrupted time series analysis were used as indicated.

Main outcome measures: Impact of ERAS process measure adherence on length of stay.

Results: After initiation of ERAS pathway, 1318 women underwent hysterectomy. There were more open surgeries after ERAS implementation, but cohorts were otherwise balanced. The impact of process measure adherence on length of stay varied based on surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open). For open surgery, compliance with intraoperative antiemetics (-30%, 95% CI -18% to 40%) and decreased postoperative fluid administration (-12%, 95% CI -1% to 21%) were significantly associated with reduced length of stay. For minimally invasive surgery, ambulation within 8 hours of surgery was associated with reduced length of stay (-53%, 95% CI -55% to 52%).

Conclusions: While adherence to overall ERAS protocols decreases length of stay, the specific components of the bundle most significantly impacting this outcome remain elusive. Our data identify early ambulation, use of antiemetics and decreasing postoperative fluid administration to be associated with decreased length of stay.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

个体术后增强康复方案组成对住院时间影响的队列研究。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨哪些增强术后恢复(ERAS)捆绑项目与术后住院时间缩短最相关,最有可能与术后住院时间缩短相关。设计:队列研究。环境:大型三级学术医疗中心。参与者:该研究包括2018年2月1日至2020年1月30日期间接受子宫切除术的1318名女性,以及2016年10月3日至2018年1月30日期间在我们机构进行的所有子宫切除术的匹配历史队列(n=1063)。干预措施:在围手术期护理中加入ERAS。这是一项队列研究,研究对象是2018年2月1日实施ERAS后在学术医疗中心接受子宫切除术的所有患者。ERAS推出后的合规性和结果由集中团队监控和管理。采用描述性统计、多元回归、中断时间序列分析。主要结果测量:ERAS过程测量依从性对住院时间的影响。结果:经ERAS通路启动后,1318例妇女行子宫切除术。ERAS实施后开放性手术较多,但队列是平衡的。过程测量依从性对住院时间的影响因手术入路(微创与开放)而异。对于开放手术,术中止吐药的依从性(-30%,95% CI -18%至40%)和术后液体给药的减少(-12%,95% CI -1%至21%)与住院时间的缩短显著相关。对于微创手术,手术8小时内走动与住院时间缩短相关(-53%,95% CI -55%至52%)。结论:虽然总体ERAS方案的依从性减少了住院时间,但对该结果影响最大的具体组成部分仍然难以捉摸。我们的数据表明,早期下床、使用止吐药和减少术后液体给药与住院时间缩短有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信