Patient Satisfaction of Telemedicine Remote Patient Monitoring: A Systematic Review.

Abstract

Introduction: To examine the variety of patient satisfaction instruments (i.e., measures, methods, and scales) used within telemedicine remote patient monitoring (RPM) services; and to assess the quality of RPM patient satisfaction instruments. Methods: Three databases were searched for articles that used survey instrumentation to assess patient satisfaction of RPM services: (1) Healthcare Administration Database (PROQUEST), (2) Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and (3) PubMed (MEDLINE). The quality of survey instrumentation methods was assessed based on validity and reliability using the Terwee et al. framework. Results: Nine studies were included in the final review. For internal consistency, seven out of nine studies received an "indeterminant" quality rating; six out of nine of the studies received a "positive" quality rating for measurement error. For content validity, seven out of nine studies received a "positive" quality rating. Discussion: There are several RPM surveys that are used to assess patient satisfaction. This review suggests wide variation among the quality, reliability, and validity of the surveys currently used in practice. Assessing patient satisfaction of RPM services by organizations, researchers, and practitioners should be done through use of reliable instrumentation.