Housing Outcomes of Adults Who Were Homeless at Admission to Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs Nationwide.

IF 3.2
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-18 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.202100430
Emma Ava Lo, Taeho Greg Rhee, Robert A Rosenheck
{"title":"Housing Outcomes of Adults Who Were Homeless at Admission to Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs Nationwide.","authors":"Emma Ava Lo,&nbsp;Taeho Greg Rhee,&nbsp;Robert A Rosenheck","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.202100430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Substance use disorders affect 30%-50% of single homeless adults, and specialized homelessness service programs enable homeless persons to exit homelessness at rates of about 80%. However, many such adults are treated in substance use disorder treatment programs. This study examined housing outcomes in these programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Treatment Episode Data Set: Discharges database were used to examine housing status at discharge from substance use disorder treatment programs of adults who were homeless at admission. Associations of outcomes with sociodemographic characteristics, treatment programs and processes, and clinical variables were further evaluated with bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Odds ratios of ≥1.5 or ≤0.67 were considered meaningful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,200,105 persons admitted to the programs, 192,838 (16.1%) were homeless at admission; 68.7% remained homeless at discharge, 16.3% were discharged to dependent housing, and only 15.0% were discharged to independent housing. Factors associated with remaining homeless included being age ≥55 years, being unemployed, admission for detoxification (vs. rehabilitation or residential treatment or ambulatory treatment), shorter stays, and program noncompletion. Factors associated with discharge to independent versus dependent housing included employment, admission to nonintensive outpatient treatment, and, unexpectedly, shorter stays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most adults experiencing homelessness at admission to substance use disorder treatment programs remained homeless at discharge, and only half of those no longer homeless were independently housed. These outcomes are considerably worse than outcomes typically reported by specialized homelessness service programs. Evidence-based service models that support exit from homelessness could be provided through augmented internal programming or links with specialized programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"872-879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202100430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Substance use disorders affect 30%-50% of single homeless adults, and specialized homelessness service programs enable homeless persons to exit homelessness at rates of about 80%. However, many such adults are treated in substance use disorder treatment programs. This study examined housing outcomes in these programs.

Methods: Data from the Treatment Episode Data Set: Discharges database were used to examine housing status at discharge from substance use disorder treatment programs of adults who were homeless at admission. Associations of outcomes with sociodemographic characteristics, treatment programs and processes, and clinical variables were further evaluated with bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Odds ratios of ≥1.5 or ≤0.67 were considered meaningful.

Results: Of 1,200,105 persons admitted to the programs, 192,838 (16.1%) were homeless at admission; 68.7% remained homeless at discharge, 16.3% were discharged to dependent housing, and only 15.0% were discharged to independent housing. Factors associated with remaining homeless included being age ≥55 years, being unemployed, admission for detoxification (vs. rehabilitation or residential treatment or ambulatory treatment), shorter stays, and program noncompletion. Factors associated with discharge to independent versus dependent housing included employment, admission to nonintensive outpatient treatment, and, unexpectedly, shorter stays.

Conclusions: Most adults experiencing homelessness at admission to substance use disorder treatment programs remained homeless at discharge, and only half of those no longer homeless were independently housed. These outcomes are considerably worse than outcomes typically reported by specialized homelessness service programs. Evidence-based service models that support exit from homelessness could be provided through augmented internal programming or links with specialized programs.

全国范围内接受药物使用障碍治疗项目的无家可归成年人的住房结果。
目的:30%-50%的单身无家可归者患有物质使用障碍,专门的无家可归者服务项目使无家可归者摆脱无家可归的比率约为80%。然而,许多这样的成年人在药物使用障碍治疗项目中接受治疗。这项研究调查了这些项目的住房结果。方法:来自治疗事件数据集的数据:使用出院数据库来检查入院时无家可归的成年人从物质使用障碍治疗项目出院时的住房状况。结果与社会人口学特征、治疗方案和过程以及临床变量的关联通过双变量和多变量logistic回归进一步评估。比值比≥1.5或≤0.67被认为有意义。结果:在接受该计划的1,200,105人中,192,838人(16.1%)在入院时无家可归;68.7%的人在出院时仍然无家可归,16.3%的人出院后住进依赖房屋,只有15.0%的人出院后住进独立房屋。与无家可归者相关的因素包括年龄≥55岁、失业、接受戒毒治疗(与康复或住院治疗或门诊治疗相比)、住院时间较短和计划未完成。与独立与依赖住房出院相关的因素包括就业、接受非密集门诊治疗,以及出乎意料的更短的住院时间。结论:大多数在接受药物使用障碍治疗项目时经历无家可归的成年人在出院时仍然无家可归,只有一半不再无家可归的人独立居住。这些结果比专门的无家可归者服务项目通常报告的结果要差得多。支持摆脱无家可归的循证服务模式可以通过扩大内部规划或与专门方案联系来提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信