Universal Community Nucleic Acid Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hong Kong Reveals Insights Into Transmission Dynamics: A Cross-Sectional and Modeling Study.

Bingyi Yang, Tim K Tsang, Huizhi Gao, Eric H Y Lau, Yun Lin, Faith Ho, Jingyi Xiao, Jessica Y Wong, Dillon C Adam, Qiuyan Liao, Peng Wu, Benjamin J Cowling, Gabriel M Leung
{"title":"Universal Community Nucleic Acid Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hong Kong Reveals Insights Into Transmission Dynamics: A Cross-Sectional and Modeling Study.","authors":"Bingyi Yang,&nbsp;Tim K Tsang,&nbsp;Huizhi Gao,&nbsp;Eric H Y Lau,&nbsp;Yun Lin,&nbsp;Faith Ho,&nbsp;Jingyi Xiao,&nbsp;Jessica Y Wong,&nbsp;Dillon C Adam,&nbsp;Qiuyan Liao,&nbsp;Peng Wu,&nbsp;Benjamin J Cowling,&nbsp;Gabriel M Leung","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing of an entire community has been used as an approach to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In Hong Kong, a universal community testing program (UCTP) was implemented at the fadeout phase of a community epidemic in July to September 2020. We described the utility of the UCTP in finding unrecognized infections and analyzed data from the UCTP and other sources to characterize transmission dynamics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We described the characteristics of people participating in the UCTP and compared the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases detected by the UCTP versus those detected by clinical diagnosis and public health surveillance (CDPHS). We developed a Bayesian model to estimate the age-specific incidence of infection and the proportion of cases detected by CDPHS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1.77 million people, 24% of the Hong Kong population, participated in the UCTP from 1 to 14 September 2020. The UCTP identified 32 new infections (1.8 per 100000 samples tested), consisting of 29% of all local cases reported during the two-week UCTP period. Compared with the CDPHS, the UCTP detected a higher proportion of sporadic cases (62% vs 27%, P<.01) and identified 6 (out of 18) additional clusters during that period. We estimated that 27% (95% credible interval: 22%, 34%) of all infections were detected by the CDPHS in the third wave.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We reported empirical evidence of the utility of population-wide COVID-19 testing in detecting unrecognized infections and clusters. Around three quarters of infections have not been identified through existing surveillance approaches including contact tracing.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e216-e223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Testing of an entire community has been used as an approach to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In Hong Kong, a universal community testing program (UCTP) was implemented at the fadeout phase of a community epidemic in July to September 2020. We described the utility of the UCTP in finding unrecognized infections and analyzed data from the UCTP and other sources to characterize transmission dynamics.

Methods: We described the characteristics of people participating in the UCTP and compared the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases detected by the UCTP versus those detected by clinical diagnosis and public health surveillance (CDPHS). We developed a Bayesian model to estimate the age-specific incidence of infection and the proportion of cases detected by CDPHS.

Results: In total, 1.77 million people, 24% of the Hong Kong population, participated in the UCTP from 1 to 14 September 2020. The UCTP identified 32 new infections (1.8 per 100000 samples tested), consisting of 29% of all local cases reported during the two-week UCTP period. Compared with the CDPHS, the UCTP detected a higher proportion of sporadic cases (62% vs 27%, P<.01) and identified 6 (out of 18) additional clusters during that period. We estimated that 27% (95% credible interval: 22%, 34%) of all infections were detected by the CDPHS in the third wave.

Conclusions: We reported empirical evidence of the utility of population-wide COVID-19 testing in detecting unrecognized infections and clusters. Around three quarters of infections have not been identified through existing surveillance approaches including contact tracing.

香港2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的普遍社区核酸检测揭示了传播动力学的见解:一项横断面和建模研究。
背景:整个社区的检测已被用作控制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的方法。香港在2020年7月至9月的社区疫情消退阶段实施了一项全民社区检测计划(UCTP)。我们描述了UCTP在发现未被识别的感染方面的效用,并分析了来自UCTP和其他来源的数据,以表征传播动态。方法:描述参与UCTP的人员特征,并将UCTP检测到的COVID-19病例与临床诊断和公共卫生监测(CDPHS)检测到的病例的临床和流行病学特征进行比较。我们开发了一个贝叶斯模型来估计感染的年龄特异性发生率和CDPHS检测到的病例比例。结果:在2020年9月1日至14日期间,共有177万人(占香港人口的24%)参加了UCTP。UCTP确定了32例新感染(每100000个检测样本中有1.8例),占在为期两周的UCTP期间报告的所有当地病例的29%。与CDPHS相比,UCTP检测到的散发病例比例更高(62% vs 27%)。结论:我们报告了全人群COVID-19检测在检测未识别感染和聚集性方面的实用性的经验证据。约四分之三的感染未通过包括接触者追踪在内的现有监测方法得到确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书