Effective Learning in Virtual Conferences: The Application of Five Principles of Learning.

Journal of European CME Pub Date : 2022-01-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21614083.2021.2019435
Eva Hofstädter-Thalmann, Jerome I Rotgans, Noelia Aybar Perez, Jonas Nordquist
{"title":"Effective Learning in Virtual Conferences: The Application of Five Principles of Learning.","authors":"Eva Hofstädter-Thalmann,&nbsp;Jerome I Rotgans,&nbsp;Noelia Aybar Perez,&nbsp;Jonas Nordquist","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2021.2019435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we examine the adaptation of learning among scientists and healthcare professionals in conferences and symposia from face-to-face to fully virtual meetings accelerated in the last years. Advantages and limitations for both settings have been described in different research studies but the effectiveness of learning can be reflected similarly by applying five fundamental principles of learning, which are based on empirical research in cognitive psychology. From a practical context, we compared the individual learning outcomes from two satellite symposia conducted face-to-face in 2019 and virtually in 2021 at the European Congress of Urology, EAU. Although both conference formats were almost identical, the five principles of learning were applied in both symposia. There were also some differences due to adaptation to online conferences, and our findings suggest that the virtual conference was perceived as significantly more effective than the face-to-face conference on all five criteria, and digital learning is a valid alternative to face-to-face conferences. What still needs to be better understood and analysed is the informal learning that is taking place during conferences, but suggesting an active design of any digital event by combining \"technical literacy· with \"learning literacy\" will enable us to better analyse and study the impact of learning using the five learning principles in the design of other events in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"11 1","pages":"2019435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/7c/ZJEC_11_2019435.PMC8757606.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.2019435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In this article, we examine the adaptation of learning among scientists and healthcare professionals in conferences and symposia from face-to-face to fully virtual meetings accelerated in the last years. Advantages and limitations for both settings have been described in different research studies but the effectiveness of learning can be reflected similarly by applying five fundamental principles of learning, which are based on empirical research in cognitive psychology. From a practical context, we compared the individual learning outcomes from two satellite symposia conducted face-to-face in 2019 and virtually in 2021 at the European Congress of Urology, EAU. Although both conference formats were almost identical, the five principles of learning were applied in both symposia. There were also some differences due to adaptation to online conferences, and our findings suggest that the virtual conference was perceived as significantly more effective than the face-to-face conference on all five criteria, and digital learning is a valid alternative to face-to-face conferences. What still needs to be better understood and analysed is the informal learning that is taking place during conferences, but suggesting an active design of any digital event by combining "technical literacy· with "learning literacy" will enable us to better analyse and study the impact of learning using the five learning principles in the design of other events in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

虚拟会议中的有效学习:五项学习原则的应用。
在这篇文章中,我们研究了科学家和医疗保健专业人员在会议和研讨会中的学习适应情况,从面对面会议到过去几年加速的完全虚拟会议。不同的研究已经描述了这两种环境的优点和局限性,但通过应用基于认知心理学实证研究的五项基本学习原则,可以类似地反映学习的有效性。从实际情况来看,我们比较了2019年和2021年在欧洲泌尿外科大会上面对面举行的两次卫星研讨会的个人学习结果。尽管两种会议形式几乎相同,但这五项学习原则在两次研讨会上都得到了应用。由于对在线会议的适应,也存在一些差异,我们的研究结果表明,在所有五个标准上,虚拟会议被认为比面对面会议更有效,数字学习是面对面会议的有效替代方案。仍然需要更好地理解和分析的是会议期间进行的非正式学习,但建议通过将“技术素养”与“学习素养”相结合来积极设计任何数字活动,将使我们能够更好地分析和研究在未来设计其他活动时使用五项学习原则的学习影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信