The leadership styles of primary healthcare center managers and center performance outcomes in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A correlational study.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Family and Community Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-19 DOI:10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_400_21
Mohammed A Alrubaysh, Mohammad H Alshehri, Eyad A Alsuhaibani, Lujain H Allowaihiq, Ammar A Alnasser, Lulu Alwazzan
{"title":"The leadership styles of primary healthcare center managers and center performance outcomes in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A correlational study.","authors":"Mohammed A Alrubaysh,&nbsp;Mohammad H Alshehri,&nbsp;Eyad A Alsuhaibani,&nbsp;Lujain H Allowaihiq,&nbsp;Ammar A Alnasser,&nbsp;Lulu Alwazzan","doi":"10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_400_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leadership is a wide concept that is rapidly developing. Diverse theories suggest different styles of leadership, with strong relationships between the different styles and their outcomes. The transformational style emphasizes motivating employees and encouraging them to find new ways of dealing with issues. The transactional (TL) style promotes ideas of rewards and punishments. The Laissez-faire style is characterized by relaxation and the tendency to leave things to happen with minimal interference.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a descriptive cross-sectional study design conducted in Primary Healthcare Centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The leadership styles were assessed using a Multi-Factor Leadership Questionnaire, which identifies the different styles of leadership. SPSS v 26.0 was used for data analysis. t-test employed to compare leadership style between raters and managers. Logistics regression model used to determine the influence of leadership styles of managers. Pearson correlation coefficient determined the linear relationship between leadership styles and its domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 respondents (65 managers vs. 65 raters) took part. \"Raters\" refer to any persons other than the manager, such as a secretary, nurse, doctor. The \"manager\" is when the person rates himself. The global transformation mean score was 3.55, for TL it was 3.42 and for passive avoidant, the mean score was 0.93. The passive avoidant (<i>t</i> = 2.005; <i>P</i> = 0.047) and management by exception (passive) (MBEP) mean scores of raters were statistically significantly higher than managers. In the binary regression model, MBEP was the independent significant predictor of manager.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perceived leadership style of Primary Healthcare Center managers was transformational but with TL. Transformational leadership was positively correlated with TL leadership but negatively correlated with passive avoidant (The Laissez-faire style). The outcome of this study demonstrated that intellectual stimulation, idealized attributes, and inspirational motivation are perhaps better than contingent reward, active management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/f3/JFCM-29-56.PMC8802731.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_400_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Leadership is a wide concept that is rapidly developing. Diverse theories suggest different styles of leadership, with strong relationships between the different styles and their outcomes. The transformational style emphasizes motivating employees and encouraging them to find new ways of dealing with issues. The transactional (TL) style promotes ideas of rewards and punishments. The Laissez-faire style is characterized by relaxation and the tendency to leave things to happen with minimal interference.

Materials and methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study design conducted in Primary Healthcare Centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The leadership styles were assessed using a Multi-Factor Leadership Questionnaire, which identifies the different styles of leadership. SPSS v 26.0 was used for data analysis. t-test employed to compare leadership style between raters and managers. Logistics regression model used to determine the influence of leadership styles of managers. Pearson correlation coefficient determined the linear relationship between leadership styles and its domains.

Results: A total of 130 respondents (65 managers vs. 65 raters) took part. "Raters" refer to any persons other than the manager, such as a secretary, nurse, doctor. The "manager" is when the person rates himself. The global transformation mean score was 3.55, for TL it was 3.42 and for passive avoidant, the mean score was 0.93. The passive avoidant (t = 2.005; P = 0.047) and management by exception (passive) (MBEP) mean scores of raters were statistically significantly higher than managers. In the binary regression model, MBEP was the independent significant predictor of manager.

Conclusion: The perceived leadership style of Primary Healthcare Center managers was transformational but with TL. Transformational leadership was positively correlated with TL leadership but negatively correlated with passive avoidant (The Laissez-faire style). The outcome of this study demonstrated that intellectual stimulation, idealized attributes, and inspirational motivation are perhaps better than contingent reward, active management.

沙特阿拉伯利雅得初级卫生保健中心管理人员的领导风格与中心绩效结果:一项相关研究。
背景:领导力是一个广泛的概念,正在迅速发展。不同的理论表明不同的领导风格,不同的风格和他们的结果之间有很强的关系。转型型风格强调激励员工,鼓励他们找到处理问题的新方法。交易型(TL)风格提倡奖励和惩罚的理念。自由放任风格的特点是放松,倾向于让事情顺其自然,尽量减少干扰。材料和方法:这是一项描述性横断面研究设计,在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的初级卫生保健中心进行。采用多因素领导问卷对领导风格进行评估,该问卷确定了不同的领导风格。采用SPSS v 26.0进行数据分析。采用t检验比较评价员和管理者的领导风格。运用logistic回归模型确定管理者领导风格的影响。Pearson相关系数决定了领导风格与其领域之间的线性关系。结果:共有130名受访者(65名经理对65名评分者)参与了调查。“评分员”是指经理以外的任何人,如秘书、护士、医生等。“经理”是指这个人对自己的评价。整体转化平均得分为3.55分,TL平均得分为3.42分,被动回避平均得分为0.93分。被动回避者(t = 2.005;P = 0.047)和例外管理(被动)(MBEP)评分者的平均得分显著高于管理者。在二元回归模型中,MBEP是经理人的独立显著预测因子。结论:基层医疗保健中心管理人员的感知领导风格为变革型,但与TL型存在正相关,与被动回避型(自由放任型)存在负相关。本研究的结果表明,智力刺激、理想化属性和鼓舞性动机可能比偶然奖励、主动管理更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Community Medicine
Journal of Family and Community Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信