Assessing Neurofilaments as Biomarkers of Neuroprotection in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: From the MS-STAT Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 7.5
Thomas E Williams, Katherine P Holdsworth, Jennifer M Nicholas, Arman Eshaghi, Theodora Katsanouli, Henrietta Wellington, Amanda Heslegrave, Henrik Zetterberg, Chris Frost, Jeremy Chataway
{"title":"Assessing Neurofilaments as Biomarkers of Neuroprotection in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: From the MS-STAT Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Thomas E Williams,&nbsp;Katherine P Holdsworth,&nbsp;Jennifer M Nicholas,&nbsp;Arman Eshaghi,&nbsp;Theodora Katsanouli,&nbsp;Henrietta Wellington,&nbsp;Amanda Heslegrave,&nbsp;Henrik Zetterberg,&nbsp;Chris Frost,&nbsp;Jeremy Chataway","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000001130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Improved biomarkers of neuroprotective treatment are needed in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) to facilitate more efficient phase 2 trial design. The MS-STAT randomized controlled trial supported the neuroprotective potential of high-dose simvastatin in secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Here, we analyze serum from the MS-STAT trial to assess the extent to which neurofilament light (NfL) and neurofilament heavy (NfH), both promising biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury, may act as biomarkers of simvastatin treatment in SPMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MS-STAT trial randomized patients to 80 mg simvastatin or placebo. Serum was analyzed for NfL and NfH using Simoa technology. We used linear mixed models to investigate the treatment effects of simvastatin compared with placebo on NfL and NfH. Additional models examined the relationships between neurofilaments and MRI and clinical measures of disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients with SPMS were included. There was no evidence for a simvastatin treatment effect on NfL or NfH: compared with placebo, NfL was 1.2% lower (95% CI 10.6% lower to 9.2% higher; <i>p</i> = 0.820) and NfH was 0.4% lower (95% CI 18.4% lower to 21.6% higher; <i>p</i> = 0.969) in the simvastatin treatment group. Secondary analyses suggested that higher NfL was associated with greater subsequent whole brain atrophy, higher T2 lesion volume, and more new/enlarging T2 lesions in the previous 12 months, as well as greater physical disability. There were no significant associations between NfH and MRI or clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found no evidence of a simvastatin treatment effect on serum neurofilaments. While confirmation of the neuroprotective benefits of simvastatin is awaited from the ongoing phase 3 study (NCT03387670), our results suggest that treatments capable of slowing the rate of whole brain atrophy in SPMS, such as simvastatin, may act via mechanisms largely independent of neuroaxonal injury, as quantified by NfL. This has important implications for the design of future phase 2 clinical trials in PMS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>MS-STAT: NCT00647348.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides class I evidence that simvastatin treatment does not have a large impact on either serum NfL or NfH, as quantified in this study, in SPMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520720,"journal":{"name":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/72/a2/NEURIMMINFL2021039196.PMC8759719.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background and objectives: Improved biomarkers of neuroprotective treatment are needed in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) to facilitate more efficient phase 2 trial design. The MS-STAT randomized controlled trial supported the neuroprotective potential of high-dose simvastatin in secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Here, we analyze serum from the MS-STAT trial to assess the extent to which neurofilament light (NfL) and neurofilament heavy (NfH), both promising biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury, may act as biomarkers of simvastatin treatment in SPMS.

Methods: The MS-STAT trial randomized patients to 80 mg simvastatin or placebo. Serum was analyzed for NfL and NfH using Simoa technology. We used linear mixed models to investigate the treatment effects of simvastatin compared with placebo on NfL and NfH. Additional models examined the relationships between neurofilaments and MRI and clinical measures of disease severity.

Results: A total of 140 patients with SPMS were included. There was no evidence for a simvastatin treatment effect on NfL or NfH: compared with placebo, NfL was 1.2% lower (95% CI 10.6% lower to 9.2% higher; p = 0.820) and NfH was 0.4% lower (95% CI 18.4% lower to 21.6% higher; p = 0.969) in the simvastatin treatment group. Secondary analyses suggested that higher NfL was associated with greater subsequent whole brain atrophy, higher T2 lesion volume, and more new/enlarging T2 lesions in the previous 12 months, as well as greater physical disability. There were no significant associations between NfH and MRI or clinical variables.

Discussion: We found no evidence of a simvastatin treatment effect on serum neurofilaments. While confirmation of the neuroprotective benefits of simvastatin is awaited from the ongoing phase 3 study (NCT03387670), our results suggest that treatments capable of slowing the rate of whole brain atrophy in SPMS, such as simvastatin, may act via mechanisms largely independent of neuroaxonal injury, as quantified by NfL. This has important implications for the design of future phase 2 clinical trials in PMS.

Trial registration information: MS-STAT: NCT00647348.

Classification of evidence: This study provides class I evidence that simvastatin treatment does not have a large impact on either serum NfL or NfH, as quantified in this study, in SPMS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估神经丝作为进行性多发性硬化症神经保护的生物标志物:来自MS-STAT随机对照试验。
背景和目的:进行性多发性硬化症(PMS)需要改进神经保护治疗的生物标志物,以促进更有效的2期试验设计。MS- stat随机对照试验支持高剂量辛伐他汀对继发性进展性多发性硬化症(SPMS)的神经保护作用。在这里,我们分析了MS-STAT试验的血清,以评估神经丝轻(NfL)和神经丝重(NfH)这两种有希望的神经轴突损伤生物标志物在多大程度上可以作为辛伐他汀治疗SPMS的生物标志物。方法:MS-STAT试验将患者随机分配到80mg辛伐他汀或安慰剂组。采用Simoa技术分析血清NfL和NfH。我们使用线性混合模型来研究辛伐他汀与安慰剂对NfL和NfH的治疗效果。另外的模型检查了神经丝与MRI和疾病严重程度的临床测量之间的关系。结果:共纳入140例SPMS患者。没有证据表明辛伐他汀治疗对NfL或NfH有影响:与安慰剂相比,NfL降低1.2% (95% CI 10.6% - 9.2%;p = 0.820), NfH降低0.4% (95% CI 18.4% - 21.6%;P = 0.969)。二次分析表明,较高的NfL与随后更大的全脑萎缩、更高的T2病变体积、在过去12个月内更多的新发/扩大的T2病变以及更大的身体残疾相关。NfH与MRI或临床变量之间无显著关联。讨论:我们没有发现辛伐他汀治疗对血清神经纤维有影响的证据。虽然正在进行的3期研究(NCT03387670)尚未证实辛伐他汀的神经保护作用,但我们的研究结果表明,辛伐他汀等能够减缓SPMS全脑萎缩速率的治疗可能通过很大程度上独立于神经轴突损伤的机制起作用,正如NfL量化的那样。这对设计未来经前症候群的二期临床试验具有重要意义。试验注册信息:MS-STAT: NCT00647348。证据分类:本研究提供的I级证据表明,辛伐他汀治疗对SPMS患者的血清NfL或NfH均没有大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信