The Impact of Slice Thickness on Diagnostic Accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Yen Zhi Tang, Amna Al-Arnawoot, Abdullah Alabousi
{"title":"The Impact of Slice Thickness on Diagnostic Accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.","authors":"Yen Zhi Tang,&nbsp;Amna Al-Arnawoot,&nbsp;Abdullah Alabousi","doi":"10.1177/08465371211068200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the effect of slice thickness on diagnostic accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT). <b>Method:</b> Two readers retrospectively interpreted 150 DBT (125 normal and 25 pathology-proven cancer) cases scanned between October 2017-November 2020. The DBT studies were randomised and reviewed independently by the two readers. DBT studies were reviewed using a standard protocol (1 mm slices, no overlap and synthetic 2D-mammography (SM)) and an experimental protocol (10 mm slabs, 5 mm overlap and SM). Any abnormality and BIRADS scores were recorded by each reader. Sensitivity, specificity, interobserver and intraobserver agreement were calculated (Cohen's Kappa κ). For diagnostic accuracy, the reference standard was histopathology or a normal mammogram at 2 years. <b>Results:</b> The sensitivity and specificity for reader 1 and 2 for cancer detection was reader 1 (97% and 79% for the standard protocol, 97% and 76% for the experimental protocol) and reader 2 (97% and 74% for both protocols). Reader 1 had 97.6% intraobserver agreement (κ .95) and reader 2 had 96.4% intraobserver agreement (κ .92) when assessing the standard and experimental protocols. There was 90.5% agreement between the readers for the standard protocol (κ .80). There was 90.9% agreement between the readers for the experimental protocol (κ .81). Of the 25 DBT studies with pathology-proven cancer, one cancer was missed by both readers using both protocols. <b>Conclusion:</b> The diagnostic accuracy was similar between the standard and experimental DBT protocols, demonstrating excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement. This suggests 10-mm thick slabs can potentially replace 1-mm thin slices in the interpretation of DBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":444006,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"535-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211068200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of slice thickness on diagnostic accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT). Method: Two readers retrospectively interpreted 150 DBT (125 normal and 25 pathology-proven cancer) cases scanned between October 2017-November 2020. The DBT studies were randomised and reviewed independently by the two readers. DBT studies were reviewed using a standard protocol (1 mm slices, no overlap and synthetic 2D-mammography (SM)) and an experimental protocol (10 mm slabs, 5 mm overlap and SM). Any abnormality and BIRADS scores were recorded by each reader. Sensitivity, specificity, interobserver and intraobserver agreement were calculated (Cohen's Kappa κ). For diagnostic accuracy, the reference standard was histopathology or a normal mammogram at 2 years. Results: The sensitivity and specificity for reader 1 and 2 for cancer detection was reader 1 (97% and 79% for the standard protocol, 97% and 76% for the experimental protocol) and reader 2 (97% and 74% for both protocols). Reader 1 had 97.6% intraobserver agreement (κ .95) and reader 2 had 96.4% intraobserver agreement (κ .92) when assessing the standard and experimental protocols. There was 90.5% agreement between the readers for the standard protocol (κ .80). There was 90.9% agreement between the readers for the experimental protocol (κ .81). Of the 25 DBT studies with pathology-proven cancer, one cancer was missed by both readers using both protocols. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy was similar between the standard and experimental DBT protocols, demonstrating excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement. This suggests 10-mm thick slabs can potentially replace 1-mm thin slices in the interpretation of DBT.

数字乳腺层析成象中切片厚度对诊断准确性的影响。
目的:探讨胸片厚度对数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)诊断准确性的影响。方法:两名读者回顾性分析了2017年10月至2020年11月扫描的150例DBT(125例正常,25例病理证实的癌症)。DBT研究是随机的,并由两位读者独立审查。采用标准方案(1毫米切片,无重叠和合成2d乳房x线摄影(SM))和实验方案(10毫米切片,5毫米重叠和SM)对DBT研究进行了回顾。每个阅读者记录任何异常和BIRADS评分。计算敏感性、特异性、观察者间和观察者内一致性(Cohen’s Kappa κ)。为了诊断的准确性,参考标准是2年的组织病理学检查或正常乳房x光检查。结果:阅读器1和阅读器2对癌症检测的敏感性和特异性分别为阅读器1(标准方案为97%和79%,实验方案为97%和76%)和阅读器2(两种方案均为97%和74%)。在评估标准和实验方案时,读者1有97.6%的观察者内一致性(κ 0.95),读者2有96.4%的观察者内一致性(κ 0.92)。读者对标准方案的一致性为90.5% (κ 0.80)。读者对实验方案的一致性为90.9% (κ .81)。在25个病理证实的癌症的DBT研究中,使用两种方案的两个读者都遗漏了一个癌症。结论:标准和实验DBT方案的诊断准确性相似,表现出良好的观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性。这表明在解释DBT时,10毫米厚的板可能取代1毫米薄的片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信