A Review of Current Literature of Interest to the Office-Based Anesthesiologist.

Q3 Medicine
Mark A Saxen
{"title":"A Review of Current Literature of Interest to the Office-Based Anesthesiologist.","authors":"Mark A Saxen","doi":"10.2344/0003-3006-68.4.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perioperative pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents has been, and continues to be, associated with severe morbidity and death despite recent advances in relevant guidelines and airway management. In this closed claim analysis, 115 cases of pulmonary aspiration were retrieved from the Anesthesia Closed Claims Database for the period between 2000 and 2015. Anesthesia malpractice claims associated with surgical, procedural, or obstetric anesthesia care were included, whereas claims associated with acute or chronic pain management were excluded. Death occurred in 57% of the claims and severe permanent injury occurred in another 14%. Risk factors that occurred in 10% ormore of cases included emergency procedure, gastrointestinal obstruction or other acute intra-abdominal process, body mass index . 35 kg/m, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, and recent oral intake (defined as more recent than standard nil per os recommendations). The presence of at least 1 aspiration risk factor was identified in 93% of the claims. Of the patients identified within the claims, 61% had either gastrointestinal obstruction or another intraabdominal process. Management of the aspiration event was judged to be substandard in 59% of the 115 claims. Comment: The findings from this study failed to confirm the application of cricoid pressure and rapid sequence induction as strategies for preventing aspiration. The authors note that although pregnancy and delivery have historically been considered major aspiration risk factors, only 3 of 115 patients in this series were pregnant. Because no definitive treatment for aspiration has been described to date, the best strategy for prevention is to avoid known risk factors.","PeriodicalId":7818,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"68 4","pages":"245-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674850/pdf/i0003-3006-68-4-245.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-68.4.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perioperative pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents has been, and continues to be, associated with severe morbidity and death despite recent advances in relevant guidelines and airway management. In this closed claim analysis, 115 cases of pulmonary aspiration were retrieved from the Anesthesia Closed Claims Database for the period between 2000 and 2015. Anesthesia malpractice claims associated with surgical, procedural, or obstetric anesthesia care were included, whereas claims associated with acute or chronic pain management were excluded. Death occurred in 57% of the claims and severe permanent injury occurred in another 14%. Risk factors that occurred in 10% ormore of cases included emergency procedure, gastrointestinal obstruction or other acute intra-abdominal process, body mass index . 35 kg/m, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, and recent oral intake (defined as more recent than standard nil per os recommendations). The presence of at least 1 aspiration risk factor was identified in 93% of the claims. Of the patients identified within the claims, 61% had either gastrointestinal obstruction or another intraabdominal process. Management of the aspiration event was judged to be substandard in 59% of the 115 claims. Comment: The findings from this study failed to confirm the application of cricoid pressure and rapid sequence induction as strategies for preventing aspiration. The authors note that although pregnancy and delivery have historically been considered major aspiration risk factors, only 3 of 115 patients in this series were pregnant. Because no definitive treatment for aspiration has been described to date, the best strategy for prevention is to avoid known risk factors.
对办公室麻醉师感兴趣的当前文献综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia progress
Anesthesia progress Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Anesthesia Progress is a peer-reviewed journal and the official publication of the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. The journal is dedicated to providing a better understanding of the advances being made in the art and science of pain and anxiety control in dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信