Comprehensive Pain Control Strategy in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mitsuharu Hosono, Hiroshi Yasumoto, Shintaro Kuwauchi, Yoshino Mitsunaga, Uetsuki Tomohiko, Naoki Minato, Kohei Kawazoe
{"title":"Comprehensive Pain Control Strategy in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair.","authors":"Mitsuharu Hosono,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yasumoto,&nbsp;Shintaro Kuwauchi,&nbsp;Yoshino Mitsunaga,&nbsp;Uetsuki Tomohiko,&nbsp;Naoki Minato,&nbsp;Kohei Kawazoe","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of our comprehensive strategy to reduce pain after minimally invasive mitral valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy was assessed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our comprehensive strategy constituted the following: planned rib cutting to avoid rib injury, sufficient intercostal muscle division to mobilize the cut rib, limiting the number of intercostal ports, avoiding nerve entrapment, continuous extra-pleural intercostal nerve block, and regular use of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We compared patients treated with this comprehensive strategy (Group S, n = 13) and patients before this strategy was implemented (Group C, n = 13). We used a numerical rating scale (NRS) as a pain scale during the first 3 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average NRS was significantly lower in Group S (0.82 ± 0.49) than in Group C (2.40 ± 1.46) (P <0.01). The maximum NRS was also significantly lower in Group S (3.23 ± 1.17) than in Group C (5.69 ± 2.43) (P <0.01). The number of patients using additional single-dose analgesic were significantly less in Group S (23.1%) than in Group C (84.6%) (P <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our comprehensive pain control strategy effectively reduced postoperative pain in minimally invasive mitral valve repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":8037,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"28 3","pages":"180-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/55/atcs-28-180.PMC9209889.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The effect of our comprehensive strategy to reduce pain after minimally invasive mitral valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy was assessed retrospectively.

Methods: Our comprehensive strategy constituted the following: planned rib cutting to avoid rib injury, sufficient intercostal muscle division to mobilize the cut rib, limiting the number of intercostal ports, avoiding nerve entrapment, continuous extra-pleural intercostal nerve block, and regular use of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We compared patients treated with this comprehensive strategy (Group S, n = 13) and patients before this strategy was implemented (Group C, n = 13). We used a numerical rating scale (NRS) as a pain scale during the first 3 days postoperatively.

Results: The average NRS was significantly lower in Group S (0.82 ± 0.49) than in Group C (2.40 ± 1.46) (P <0.01). The maximum NRS was also significantly lower in Group S (3.23 ± 1.17) than in Group C (5.69 ± 2.43) (P <0.01). The number of patients using additional single-dose analgesic were significantly less in Group S (23.1%) than in Group C (84.6%) (P <0.01).

Conclusion: Our comprehensive pain control strategy effectively reduced postoperative pain in minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

微创二尖瓣修复的综合疼痛控制策略。
目的:回顾性评价经右小开胸微创二尖瓣修复术后综合治疗方案的效果。方法:我们的综合策略是:有计划的肋骨切割以避免肋骨损伤,充分的肋间肌分隔以调动被切割的肋骨,限制肋间端口的数量,避免神经卡压,持续的胸膜外肋间神经阻滞,定期使用口服非甾体类抗炎药。我们比较采用该综合策略治疗的患者(S组,n = 13)和未采用该策略的患者(C组,n = 13)。我们使用数值评定量表(NRS)作为术后前3天的疼痛量表。结果:S组的平均NRS(0.82±0.49)明显低于C组(2.40±1.46)(P)。结论:综合疼痛控制策略可有效减轻微创二尖瓣修复术后的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信