Use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to standardize clinical trial recruitment in Takayasu's arteritis.

Kaitlin A Quinn, Hugh D Alessi, Cristina Ponte, Emily Rose, Mark A Ahlman, Christopher Redmond, Yiming Luo, Ertugrul Cagri Bolek, Carol A Langford, Peter A Merkel, Peter C Grayson
{"title":"Use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to standardize clinical trial recruitment in Takayasu's arteritis.","authors":"Kaitlin A Quinn,&nbsp;Hugh D Alessi,&nbsp;Cristina Ponte,&nbsp;Emily Rose,&nbsp;Mark A Ahlman,&nbsp;Christopher Redmond,&nbsp;Yiming Luo,&nbsp;Ertugrul Cagri Bolek,&nbsp;Carol A Langford,&nbsp;Peter A Merkel,&nbsp;Peter C Grayson","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keac021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether data from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET should be incorporated into eligibility criteria for clinical trials in Takayasu's arteritis (TAK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in two parts. Part one was an international online survey among physicians with experience managing TAK to determine, using clinical vignettes, whether FDG-PET data influence decisions about enrolment in trials. Part two used patient data from an observational cohort study in TAK to assess agreement regarding decisions about enrolment into trials, based on clinical assessment with and without incorporation of FDG-PET data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In part one, 68 physicians responded to the survey. Most physicians had used FDG-PET to diagnose TAK (82%) or monitor disease activity (66%). In vignettes representing active clinical disease, FDG-PET findings increased physician confidence in disease assessment and reduced outlier assessments. The greatest variability in decisions regarding enrolment into trials was observed in vignettes representing constitutional symptoms alone and elevated acute-phase reactants. In these cases, FDG-PET findings influenced decisions about enrolment and improved physician confidence. In multivariable models, FDG-PET findings were 1.29 times more strongly associated with enrolment decisions compared with levels of acute-phase reactants. In part two, incorporation of FDG-PET data significantly improved agreement about enrolment decisions between raters [inter-rater reliability (IRR) = 0.68 (95% CI 0.67, 0.69) to IRR = 0.88 (95% CI 0.87, 0.89); P < 0.01].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporation of FDG-PET data into assessment of TAK influences decisions about enrolment of patients into trials, improves physician confidence about clinical assessment and could help reduce variability in study populations. Future trials in TAK should consider incorporating FDG-PET data into eligibility criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":379078,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"4047-4055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536789/pdf/keac021.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether data from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET should be incorporated into eligibility criteria for clinical trials in Takayasu's arteritis (TAK).

Methods: The study was conducted in two parts. Part one was an international online survey among physicians with experience managing TAK to determine, using clinical vignettes, whether FDG-PET data influence decisions about enrolment in trials. Part two used patient data from an observational cohort study in TAK to assess agreement regarding decisions about enrolment into trials, based on clinical assessment with and without incorporation of FDG-PET data.

Results: In part one, 68 physicians responded to the survey. Most physicians had used FDG-PET to diagnose TAK (82%) or monitor disease activity (66%). In vignettes representing active clinical disease, FDG-PET findings increased physician confidence in disease assessment and reduced outlier assessments. The greatest variability in decisions regarding enrolment into trials was observed in vignettes representing constitutional symptoms alone and elevated acute-phase reactants. In these cases, FDG-PET findings influenced decisions about enrolment and improved physician confidence. In multivariable models, FDG-PET findings were 1.29 times more strongly associated with enrolment decisions compared with levels of acute-phase reactants. In part two, incorporation of FDG-PET data significantly improved agreement about enrolment decisions between raters [inter-rater reliability (IRR) = 0.68 (95% CI 0.67, 0.69) to IRR = 0.88 (95% CI 0.87, 0.89); P < 0.01].

Conclusions: Incorporation of FDG-PET data into assessment of TAK influences decisions about enrolment of patients into trials, improves physician confidence about clinical assessment and could help reduce variability in study populations. Future trials in TAK should consider incorporating FDG-PET data into eligibility criteria.

使用18f氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描规范高松动脉炎的临床试验招募。
目的:评估18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET的数据是否应纳入Takayasu动脉炎(TAK)临床试验的资格标准。方法:研究分为两部分。第一部分是在具有管理TAK经验的医生中进行的一项国际在线调查,以确定FDG-PET数据是否影响有关试验入组的决策。第二部分使用TAK的一项观察性队列研究的患者数据来评估关于入组试验的决定的一致性,基于合并和不合并FDG-PET数据的临床评估。结果:第一部分有68名医生参与了调查。大多数医生曾使用FDG-PET诊断TAK(82%)或监测疾病活动性(66%)。在代表活动性临床疾病的小样本中,FDG-PET结果增加了医生对疾病评估的信心,减少了异常值评估。在纳入试验的决定中,最大的可变性是在仅代表体质症状和急性期反应物升高的小插曲中观察到的。在这些病例中,FDG-PET的发现影响了关于入组的决定,提高了医生的信心。在多变量模型中,与急性期反应物水平相比,FDG-PET结果与入学决定的相关性高1.29倍。在第二部分中,纳入FDG-PET数据显著提高了评分者对入组决策的一致性[评分者间信度(IRR) = 0.68 (95% CI 0.67, 0.69)至IRR = 0.88 (95% CI 0.87, 0.89);结论:将FDG-PET数据纳入TAK评估影响了患者入组试验的决定,提高了医生对临床评估的信心,并有助于减少研究人群中的变异性。未来的TAK试验应考虑将FDG-PET数据纳入合格标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书