Remission is not maintained over 2 years with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
{"title":"Remission is not maintained over 2 years with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Sathish Muthu, Madhan Jeyaraman, Rajni Ranjan, Saurabh Kumar Jha","doi":"10.4331/wjbc.v12.i6.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (HSCT) is being accepted as a standard of care in various inflammatory diseases. The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been closely evolving with the understanding of disease pathogenesis. With the rising resistance to the traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and targeted biological therapy, researchers are in pursuit of other methods for disease management. Since the ultimate goal of the ideal treatment of RA is to restore immune tolerance, HSCT attracts much attention considering its reparative, paracrine, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a systematic review of studies on HSCT in RA is lacking.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the role of HSCT in the management of RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A detailed search of PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Web of Science databases was made to identify the relevant articles till September 2020 following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. We extracted data including the number of patients, source of hematopoietic stem cells, their mobilization and conditioning regimens, results, and complications from the eligible studies. Results were dichotomized into success (ACR 50/70) and failure (ACR 20) based on the improvement from baseline characteristics. The methodological quality of the included studies was also assessed. Analysis was performed using OpenMeta[Analysis] software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 17 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 11 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies) with 233 patients for analysis. HSCT provided a significantly beneficial overall improvement in the clinical grades of ACR criteria (<i>Z</i> = 11.309, <i>P <</i> 0.001). However, the remission was noted only till 24 mo and later on the significance of the result was lost (<i>Z</i> = 1.737, <i>P</i> = 0.082). A less than 1% treatment-related mortality was noted from the included studies. No major drug-related toxicities were noted in any of the included studies. All patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT received immunosuppression in the conditioning regimen to counteract the graft-<i>vs</i>-host reaction which made them vulnerable to infections. It is noted that the source of hematopoietic stem cells did not play a role in altering the functional outcome and both autologous (<i>Z</i> = 9.972, <i>P <</i> 0.001) and allogenic (<i>Z</i> = 6.978, <i>P <</i> 0.001) sources produced significant improvement in the outcome compared to the pre-operative state despite having a significant heterogeneity among the studies reporting them (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 99.4, <i>P <</i> 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the available literature is encouraging towards the use of HSCT in refractory cases with significant improvement from baseline till 2 years, the inclusion of HSCT into the standard of care of RA needs further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23691,"journal":{"name":"World journal of biological chemistry","volume":"12 6","pages":"114-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2c/c3/WJBC-12-114.PMC8637617.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of biological chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4331/wjbc.v12.i6.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (HSCT) is being accepted as a standard of care in various inflammatory diseases. The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been closely evolving with the understanding of disease pathogenesis. With the rising resistance to the traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and targeted biological therapy, researchers are in pursuit of other methods for disease management. Since the ultimate goal of the ideal treatment of RA is to restore immune tolerance, HSCT attracts much attention considering its reparative, paracrine, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a systematic review of studies on HSCT in RA is lacking.
Aim: To investigate the role of HSCT in the management of RA.
Methods: A detailed search of PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Web of Science databases was made to identify the relevant articles till September 2020 following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. We extracted data including the number of patients, source of hematopoietic stem cells, their mobilization and conditioning regimens, results, and complications from the eligible studies. Results were dichotomized into success (ACR 50/70) and failure (ACR 20) based on the improvement from baseline characteristics. The methodological quality of the included studies was also assessed. Analysis was performed using OpenMeta[Analysis] software.
Results: We included 17 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 11 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies) with 233 patients for analysis. HSCT provided a significantly beneficial overall improvement in the clinical grades of ACR criteria (Z = 11.309, P < 0.001). However, the remission was noted only till 24 mo and later on the significance of the result was lost (Z = 1.737, P = 0.082). A less than 1% treatment-related mortality was noted from the included studies. No major drug-related toxicities were noted in any of the included studies. All patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT received immunosuppression in the conditioning regimen to counteract the graft-vs-host reaction which made them vulnerable to infections. It is noted that the source of hematopoietic stem cells did not play a role in altering the functional outcome and both autologous (Z = 9.972, P < 0.001) and allogenic (Z = 6.978, P < 0.001) sources produced significant improvement in the outcome compared to the pre-operative state despite having a significant heterogeneity among the studies reporting them (I2 = 99.4, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Although the available literature is encouraging towards the use of HSCT in refractory cases with significant improvement from baseline till 2 years, the inclusion of HSCT into the standard of care of RA needs further exploration.
背景:造血干细胞(HSC)移植(HSCT)正在被接受为各种炎症性疾病的标准治疗。类风湿关节炎(RA)的治疗随着对其发病机制的了解而密切发展。随着传统抗风湿药物和靶向生物治疗的耐药性上升,研究人员正在寻求其他疾病管理方法。由于RA理想治疗的最终目标是恢复免疫耐受,因此造血干细胞移植因其修复、旁分泌和抗炎作用而备受关注。然而,缺乏对RA中HSCT研究的系统综述。目的:探讨HSCT在类风湿关节炎治疗中的作用。方法:根据Cochrane和PRISMA指南,对PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库进行详细检索,确定截至2020年9月的相关文章。我们从符合条件的研究中提取了包括患者数量、造血干细胞来源、其动员和调理方案、结果和并发症在内的数据。根据基线特征的改善情况,将结果分为成功(ACR 50/70)和失败(ACR 20)。对纳入研究的方法学质量也进行了评估。采用OpenMeta[Analysis]软件进行分析。结果:我们纳入了17项研究(1项随机对照试验,11项前瞻性研究,5项回顾性研究)233例患者进行分析。HSCT在ACR标准的临床分级方面提供了显著有益的总体改善(Z = 11.309, P 0.001)。然而,直到24个月才注意到缓解,之后结果的意义就失去了(Z = 1.737, P = 0.082)。从纳入的研究中发现,与治疗相关的死亡率低于1%。在所有纳入的研究中均未发现主要的药物相关毒性。所有接受同种异体造血干细胞移植的患者在调节方案中接受免疫抑制,以抵消移植物抗宿主反应,这种反应使他们容易受到感染。值得注意的是,造血干细胞的来源并没有改变功能结果,自体(Z = 9.972, P 0.001)和同种异体(Z = 6.978, P 0.001)来源与术前相比,结果都有显著改善,尽管在报道它们的研究中存在显著的异质性(I 2 = 99.4, P 0.001)。结论:尽管现有文献对顽固性病例使用HSCT表示鼓舞,从基线到2年有显著改善,但将HSCT纳入RA的标准治疗还需要进一步探索。