Thomas Achombwom Vukugah, Vera Nyibi Ntoh, Derick Akompab Akoku, Simo Leonie, Amed Jacob
{"title":"Research Questions and Priorities for Pediatric Tuberculosis: A Survey of Published Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.","authors":"Thomas Achombwom Vukugah, Vera Nyibi Ntoh, Derick Akompab Akoku, Simo Leonie, Amed Jacob","doi":"10.1155/2022/1686047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advancing a research agenda designed to meet the specific needs of children is critical to ending pediatric TB epidemic. Systematic reviews are increasingly informing policies in pediatric tuberculosis (TB) care and control. However, there is a paucity of information on pediatric TB research priorities. <i>Methodology</i>. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on any aspect related to pediatric TB published between 2015 and 2021. We used the UK Health Research Classification System (HRCS) to help us classify the research questions and priorities. <i>Findings</i>. In total, 29 systematic reviews, with 84 research questions, were included in this review. The four most common research topics in the area of detection were 43.33% screening and diagnosis of TB, 23.33% evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, 13.34% TB etiology and risk factors, and 13.34% prevention of disease and conditions and promotion of well-being. The research priorities focused mainly on evaluating TB diagnosis by improving yield through enhanced in specimen collection or preparation and evaluating of bacteriological TB diagnostic tests. Other topics of future research were developing a treatment for TB in children, assessing the use of IPT in reducing TB-associated morbidity, evaluating the prioritization of an IPT-friendly healthcare environment, and providing additional guidance for the use of isoniazid in the prevention of TB in HIV-infected children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for more systematic reviews on pediatric TB. The review identified several key priorities for future pediatric TB research mainly in the domain of (1) \"Detection, screening and diagnosis,\" \"Development of Treatments and Therapeutic Interventions,\" and \"Prevention of Disease and Conditions, and Promotion of Well-Being.\" These domains are very relevant in the research component of the roadmap towards ending TB in children. It also will serve as an additional action in the WHO End TB strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":30261,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1686047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844079/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1686047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Advancing a research agenda designed to meet the specific needs of children is critical to ending pediatric TB epidemic. Systematic reviews are increasingly informing policies in pediatric tuberculosis (TB) care and control. However, there is a paucity of information on pediatric TB research priorities. Methodology. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on any aspect related to pediatric TB published between 2015 and 2021. We used the UK Health Research Classification System (HRCS) to help us classify the research questions and priorities. Findings. In total, 29 systematic reviews, with 84 research questions, were included in this review. The four most common research topics in the area of detection were 43.33% screening and diagnosis of TB, 23.33% evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, 13.34% TB etiology and risk factors, and 13.34% prevention of disease and conditions and promotion of well-being. The research priorities focused mainly on evaluating TB diagnosis by improving yield through enhanced in specimen collection or preparation and evaluating of bacteriological TB diagnostic tests. Other topics of future research were developing a treatment for TB in children, assessing the use of IPT in reducing TB-associated morbidity, evaluating the prioritization of an IPT-friendly healthcare environment, and providing additional guidance for the use of isoniazid in the prevention of TB in HIV-infected children.
Conclusion: There is a need for more systematic reviews on pediatric TB. The review identified several key priorities for future pediatric TB research mainly in the domain of (1) "Detection, screening and diagnosis," "Development of Treatments and Therapeutic Interventions," and "Prevention of Disease and Conditions, and Promotion of Well-Being." These domains are very relevant in the research component of the roadmap towards ending TB in children. It also will serve as an additional action in the WHO End TB strategy.
背景:推进一项旨在满足儿童特定需求的研究议程对于终止儿童结核病流行至关重要。系统评价正日益为儿科结核病治疗和控制政策提供信息。然而,关于儿童结核病研究重点的信息缺乏。方法。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆,检索了2015年至2021年间发表的与儿童结核病相关的任何方面的系统综述和荟萃分析。我们使用英国健康研究分类系统(HRCS)来帮助我们对研究问题和优先级进行分类。发现。本综述共纳入29篇系统综述,涉及84个研究问题。检测领域最常见的4个研究课题分别是:结核病筛查和诊断43.33%、治疗和治疗干预评估23.33%、结核病病原学和危险因素13.34%、疾病和病症预防及促进健康13.34%。研究重点主要集中在通过加强标本收集或制备和评估细菌学结核病诊断试验来提高产量来评估结核病诊断。未来研究的其他主题是开发儿童结核病治疗方法,评估IPT在减少结核病相关发病率方面的使用,评估IPT友好型医疗环境的优先次序,以及为使用异烟肼预防艾滋病毒感染儿童结核病提供额外指导。结论:有必要对儿童结核病进行更多的系统评价。该综述确定了未来儿童结核病研究的几个关键优先事项,主要在以下领域:(1)“检测、筛选和诊断”,“治疗和治疗干预的发展”,以及“疾病和状况的预防,以及福祉的促进”。这些领域与终止儿童结核病路线图的研究部分非常相关。它还将作为世卫组织终止结核病战略的一项补充行动。