Improved Treatment Related Mortality in Patients with Primary Systemic Amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (aHSCT).

Akshata Pandit, Lai Wei, Luis Bustamante, Patrick Elder, William B S Falk, Megan Sell, Ashley Rosko, Don M Benson, Steven M Devine, Craig C Hofmeister, Yvonne A Efebera
{"title":"Improved Treatment Related Mortality in Patients with Primary Systemic Amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (aHSCT).","authors":"Akshata Pandit,&nbsp;Lai Wei,&nbsp;Luis Bustamante,&nbsp;Patrick Elder,&nbsp;William B S Falk,&nbsp;Megan Sell,&nbsp;Ashley Rosko,&nbsp;Don M Benson,&nbsp;Steven M Devine,&nbsp;Craig C Hofmeister,&nbsp;Yvonne A Efebera","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To date, there is no standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed Primary (AL) amyloidosis. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) is a reasonable option, but has been limited in its use due to increase in treatment-related mortality (TRM). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 42 newly diagnosed consecutive AL amyloidosis patients transplanted at our center. The median age at aHSCT was 57.5 (range 26-71). Twenty one (50%) had involvement of at least two organs and 40 (97%) patients had cardiac stage I or II. Patients received high dose Melphalan 140(n=4) or 200(n=38) mg/m<sup>2</sup>. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftments were 12 and 18 days, respectively. Three months hematologic response were complete response in 21 patients (50%), very good partial response in 4 (10%), partial response in 5 (12%) and Minimal/Stable disease in 6(15%). The respective 1, 3, and 5 year progression-free survival were 79%, 67% and 57%, and overall survival from Transplant 81%, 73% and 66%. Day 100 and 1 year TRM were 4.8% and 7.1% respectively. Our results show that aHSCT is a safe and reasonable option for patients with AL amyloidosis. Day 100 and 1 year TRM compares favorably to multiple myeloma patients undergoing aHSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":93414,"journal":{"name":"Archives of hematology and blood diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734359/pdf/nihms-1573589.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of hematology and blood diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, there is no standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed Primary (AL) amyloidosis. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) is a reasonable option, but has been limited in its use due to increase in treatment-related mortality (TRM). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 42 newly diagnosed consecutive AL amyloidosis patients transplanted at our center. The median age at aHSCT was 57.5 (range 26-71). Twenty one (50%) had involvement of at least two organs and 40 (97%) patients had cardiac stage I or II. Patients received high dose Melphalan 140(n=4) or 200(n=38) mg/m2. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftments were 12 and 18 days, respectively. Three months hematologic response were complete response in 21 patients (50%), very good partial response in 4 (10%), partial response in 5 (12%) and Minimal/Stable disease in 6(15%). The respective 1, 3, and 5 year progression-free survival were 79%, 67% and 57%, and overall survival from Transplant 81%, 73% and 66%. Day 100 and 1 year TRM were 4.8% and 7.1% respectively. Our results show that aHSCT is a safe and reasonable option for patients with AL amyloidosis. Day 100 and 1 year TRM compares favorably to multiple myeloma patients undergoing aHSCT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自体造血干细胞移植(aHSCT)改善原发性系统性淀粉样变性(AL淀粉样变性)患者的治疗相关死亡率
到目前为止,对于新诊断的原发性(AL)淀粉样变性患者没有标准的护理。自体造血干细胞移植(aHSCT)是一种合理的选择,但由于治疗相关死亡率(TRM)的增加,其使用受到限制。我们回顾性分析了42例新诊断的连续AL淀粉样变性患者在本中心移植的结果。aHSCT的中位年龄为57.5岁(范围26-71岁)。21例(50%)患者至少有两个器官受累,40例(97%)患者有心脏I期或II期。患者接受高剂量美法兰140(n=4)或200(n=38) mg/m2。中性粒细胞和血小板植入的中位时间分别为12天和18天。3个月的血液学反应为21例(50%)完全缓解,4例(10%)非常好部分缓解,5例(12%)部分缓解,6例(15%)病情轻微/稳定。1年、3年和5年的无进展生存率分别为79%、67%和57%,移植总生存率分别为81%、73%和66%。第100天和第1年TRM分别为4.8%和7.1%。我们的研究结果表明aHSCT是AL淀粉样变性患者安全合理的选择。与接受aHSCT的多发性骨髓瘤患者相比,第100天和第1年的TRM更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信