Prerenal Transplant Education and Evaluation Positively Impacts Outcomes.

Michelle T Jesse, Erin Clifton, Dean Y Kim, Dayna Nicholson, Rujuta Patil, Shweta Bhavsar, Soham Desai, Kendyll Gartrelle, Anne Eshelman, Elizabeth Fleagle, Brian Ahmedani, Noelle E Carlozzi, Amy Tang, Anita Patel
{"title":"Prerenal Transplant Education and Evaluation Positively Impacts Outcomes.","authors":"Michelle T Jesse,&nbsp;Erin Clifton,&nbsp;Dean Y Kim,&nbsp;Dayna Nicholson,&nbsp;Rujuta Patil,&nbsp;Shweta Bhavsar,&nbsp;Soham Desai,&nbsp;Kendyll Gartrelle,&nbsp;Anne Eshelman,&nbsp;Elizabeth Fleagle,&nbsp;Brian Ahmedani,&nbsp;Noelle E Carlozzi,&nbsp;Amy Tang,&nbsp;Anita Patel","doi":"10.1177/15269248211064888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> An outstanding question in kidney transplantation is how to prepare candidates and their social supports for optimal posttransplant outcomes. <b>Project Aims:</b> This program evaluation assessed whether a pretransplant quality improvement clinic improved clinical outcomes in the year posttransplant compared to recipients receiving standard of care. <b>Design:</b> The Countdown to Transplant Clinic was implemented with kidney transplant candidates expected to receive a transplant within the next few months. The clinic included an enhanced education session on posttransplant lifestyle management, confirmation of support (≥2 adults), and evaluations by transplant social work, psychology, and nephrology. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-five patients participated in the clinic and underwent a transplant. A retrospective chart review of posttransplant laboratory values, rehospitalizations (within 3-months posttransplant), biopsy-confirmed graft failure, and mortality (within 1-year posttransplant) were collected from both groups. Univariate and multivariate propensity score-weighted linear or logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between clinic participation and outcomes. In models adjusting for relevant covariates, participation in The Countdown to Transplant Clinic (vs standard care) was associated with a lower coefficient of variation of serum tacrolimus (all values collected 3-12 months posttransplant), 30-day posttransplant white blood cell counts (but not 90-day), 90-day posttransplant potassium, and 30 and 31 to 90 days rehospitalizations. Clinic participation did not predict serum glucose levels at 30- or 90-days posttransplant. Due to low rates of rejection and mortality, meaningful comparisons were not possible. <b>Conclusion:</b> Participation in a pretransplant, multicomponent clinic may improve certain outcomes of interest posttransplantation. Pilot testing for feasibility for randomized controlled trials is a necessary next step.</p>","PeriodicalId":346415,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248211064888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An outstanding question in kidney transplantation is how to prepare candidates and their social supports for optimal posttransplant outcomes. Project Aims: This program evaluation assessed whether a pretransplant quality improvement clinic improved clinical outcomes in the year posttransplant compared to recipients receiving standard of care. Design: The Countdown to Transplant Clinic was implemented with kidney transplant candidates expected to receive a transplant within the next few months. The clinic included an enhanced education session on posttransplant lifestyle management, confirmation of support (≥2 adults), and evaluations by transplant social work, psychology, and nephrology. Results: Seventy-five patients participated in the clinic and underwent a transplant. A retrospective chart review of posttransplant laboratory values, rehospitalizations (within 3-months posttransplant), biopsy-confirmed graft failure, and mortality (within 1-year posttransplant) were collected from both groups. Univariate and multivariate propensity score-weighted linear or logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between clinic participation and outcomes. In models adjusting for relevant covariates, participation in The Countdown to Transplant Clinic (vs standard care) was associated with a lower coefficient of variation of serum tacrolimus (all values collected 3-12 months posttransplant), 30-day posttransplant white blood cell counts (but not 90-day), 90-day posttransplant potassium, and 30 and 31 to 90 days rehospitalizations. Clinic participation did not predict serum glucose levels at 30- or 90-days posttransplant. Due to low rates of rejection and mortality, meaningful comparisons were not possible. Conclusion: Participation in a pretransplant, multicomponent clinic may improve certain outcomes of interest posttransplantation. Pilot testing for feasibility for randomized controlled trials is a necessary next step.

预防性移植教育和评估对预后有积极影响。
导论:肾移植的一个突出问题是如何准备候选人和他们的社会支持,以获得最佳的移植后结果。项目目的:本项目评估与接受标准治疗的受者相比,移植前质量改善诊所是否改善了移植后一年的临床结果。设计:移植倒计时诊所的实施与肾移植候选人预计将在未来几个月内接受移植。临床包括移植后生活方式管理的强化教育,支持确认(≥2名成人),以及移植社会工作、心理学和肾脏病学的评估。结果:75例患者参加了临床并接受了移植。收集两组移植后实验室数据、再住院(移植后3个月内)、活检证实的移植物衰竭和死亡率(移植后1年内)的回顾性图表。使用单变量和多变量倾向评分加权线性或逻辑回归模型来评估临床参与与结果之间的关系。在校正相关变量的模型中,参加移植倒计时诊所(与标准护理相比)与血清他克莫司(移植后3-12个月收集的所有值)、移植后30天白细胞计数(但不包括90天)、移植后90天钾、30天和31至90天再住院的变异系数较低相关。临床参与并不能预测移植后30天或90天的血糖水平。由于排异率和死亡率较低,不可能进行有意义的比较。结论:参与移植前的多成分临床可能改善移植后的某些结果。下一步有必要对随机对照试验的可行性进行试点测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信